· Public charity
Avenue Greenlight
Revitalization of micro-grant programs to support San Francisos local communities and local merchant association members
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 25 grants below total $991,017 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,105,458 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $114,441 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k2 grants · $14k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $352k
- $50k–250k11 grants · $625k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Bayview Merchants Association | $95,000 |
| West Portal Merchants Assoc | $55,000 |
| Union Street Association | $55,000 |
| Fillmore Merchants & Improvement Assoc | $55,000 |
| Dogpatch Green Benefit District | $55,000 |
| Glen Park Merchants Assoc | $55,000 |
| Clement Street Merchants Assoc | $55,000 |
| Outer Sunset Merchant and Professional Assoc | $50,000 |
| Mission Merchants Assoc | $50,000 |
| Tenderloin Community Benefit District | $50,000 |
| Balboa Village Merchants Assoc | $50,000 |
| Excelsior and Outer Mission Merchants Assoc | $48,650 |
| Divisadero Merchants Assoc | $48,168 |
| Valencia Corridor Merchants Assoc | $39,499 |
| Fisherman's Wharf Merchants Assoc | $37,713 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 99% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2022, 0 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 16% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $829k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PDPOTRERO DOGPATCH MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION2× · 2021–2022 · $78k
- HVHAYES VALLEY MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION2× · 2021–2022 · $55k
- ISINNER SUNSET MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION2× · 2021–2022 · $55k
Funded once
- MOMerchants of Upper Market Incgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +201% · 42% of their budget
- NMNIHONMACHI MERCHANTS ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue -27% · 55% of their budget
- HAHAIGHT ASHBURY MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION INCone grant, 2021 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Noe valley mercahnt visibility in the san francisco community
Provide resources and assistance to vietnamese small businesses and community in oakland area
Educational financial resources to LMI communities
The Montclair Village Association (MVA) is a Business Improvement District made up of approximately 230 retail and service businesses located in Montclair Village. The MVAs mission is to support its merchant members, and to help the…
Recognize and promote the endeavors of those who contributed to the
Promoting Cole Valley businesses
The Downtown Berkely Assocaition works to strengthen the Downtown as a vibrant and welcoming urban destination for arts, culture, and commerce through effective advocacy, prmotion and direct services.
OMI-CPP serves San Franciscos 94112 and 94132 neighborhoods by promoting equity, inclusion, and empowerment through multicultural events, homeless outreach, civic engagement, small business marketing & graphic design, and social justice…
Mission Art 415 Inc aims to represent and promote artists and art projects, enhancing community engagement and cultural vibrancy through the celebration of art.
To save historic movie theaters in san francisco.
Provide Chinese Culture and Help to Advance social, economic well-being of Chinese American at Monterey Bay, California.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Balboa Village Merchants Association and the most unlike its peers is Dogpatch & Northwest Potrero Hill Green Benefit District. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 14 years old; the field is 18. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 15% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BAYVIEW MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds GLEN PARK MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds CHINATOWN MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds FILLMORE MERCHANTS & IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNION STREET ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Dogpatch & Northwest Potrero Hill Green Benefit District ↗
- Who funds Valencia Corridor Merchants Association ↗
- Who funds Merchants of Upper Market Inc ↗
- Who funds Mission Merchants Association Incorporated ↗
- Who funds NIHONMACHI MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds North of MarketTenderloin Community Benefit Corporation ↗
- Who funds HAIGHT ASHBURY MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Balboa Village Merchants Association ↗
- Who funds FISHERMANS WHARF MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds POTRERO HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO COUNCIL OF DISTRICT MERCHANTS ASSOCIATIONS INC ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Avenue Greenlight funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Avenue Greenlight?
Find your warmest path to Avenue Greenlight through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.