Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Sentry Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$44k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$26k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

59% of The Sentry Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Gaston Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

1
’18
3
’19
1
’20
1
’21
1
’22
1
’23
2
’24
1
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Religion$62kPhilanthropy$48kYouth Development$25kHealth$9kEducation$3kPublic Benefit$1kCommunity Improvement$1kHuman Services$350Other$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $26k
$5,750
Median grant
1
States reached
$80k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GASTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$26,000
CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES$6,350
ASBURY ACADEMY BACK PACK PRG$5,750
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH$3,850
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH$1,932
CFO MINISTRIES$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES: $11k → 9%CFO MINISTRIES: $200 → 10%GASTON COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $16k → 12%CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $100 → 8%DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS: $100 → 10%CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES: $8k → 9%CFO MINISTRIES: $200 → 10%GASTON COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3k → 12%CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES: $7k → 9%CFO MINISTRIES: $100 → 10%GASTON COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1k → 12%CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES: $7k → 9%CFO MINISTRIES: $100 → 10%GASTON COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1k → 12%CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES: $7k → 9%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH: $2k → 10%CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES: $7k → 9%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH: $1k → 10%CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES: $6k → 9%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH: $1k → 10%ASBURY ACADEMY BACK PACK PRG: $6k → 9%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH: $1k → 10%ASBURY ACADEMY BACK PACK PRG: $5k → 9%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH: $1k → 10%ASBURY ACADEMY BACK PACK PRG: $5k → 9%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH: $1k → 10%ASBURY ACADEMY BACK PACK PRG: $4k → 9%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH: $1k → 10%FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH: $4k → 9%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH: $400 → 10%FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH: $3k → 9%ASBURY ACADEMY BACK PACK PRG: $3k → 9%ASBURY ACADEMY BACK PACK PRG: $3k → 9%CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES: $2k → 9%LINCOLN COUNTY COMMUNITY FRIENDS CO: $1k → 9%GE MASSEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $1k → 9%LINCOLNTON MIDDLE SCHOOL: $1k → 9%LINCOLN COUNTY COALITION: $1k → 9%S RAY LOWDER ELEMENTARY: $500 → 9%THE AMERICAN RED CROSS: $250 → 9%BLAZIN TRAILS COWBOY CHURCH: $100 → 9%BLAZIN TRAILS COWBOY CHURCH: $100 → 9%BLAZIN TRAILS COWBOY CHURCH: $100 → 9%IRON STATION ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $100 → 9%PURSIT CHURCH BUILDING FUND: $100 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$117k · 7 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
11

Total granted

$117k
$5k

Still filing today

0%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $54k
  • AA
    ASBURY ACADEMY BACK PACK PRG
    6× · 2020–2025 · $25k
  • GC
    GASTON COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
    4× · 2019–2022 · $21k

Funded once

  • LC
    LINCOLN COUNTY COMMUNITY FRIENDS CORPORATION
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
  • GM
    GE MASSEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
  • LC
    LINCOLN COUNTY COALITION
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
1/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC: $53,950 · OtherCHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INCASBURY ACADEMY BACK PACK PRG: $24,950 · OtherASBURY ACADEMY BACK PACK PRGGASTON COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $21,000 · OtherGASTON COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH: $9,332 · OtherST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCHFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH: $7,000 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH+12 more: $6,200 · OtherGASTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $27,000 · PhilanthropyGASTON COMMUNITY FOU…CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $100 · Health
Other$122,432Philanthropy$27,000Health$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGASTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $27,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDisabled American Veterans: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GASTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Disabled American Veterans ↗
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Sentry Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Sentry Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sentry’s filings →

    More from the funding graph