Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Selvin Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$29k
Granted FY2021
15
Grants FY2021
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Arts & Culture$97kEducation$6kCivil Rights$5kReligion$4kHuman Services$3kPublic Benefit$2kYouth Development$1kHousing & Shelter$1kOther$0
02FY2021 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k13 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$500
Median grant
3
States reached
$305k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
5 STAR THEATRICAL$10,000
5 STAR THEATRICAL$10,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
CENTER THEATRE GP$1,500
THE MUSIC CENTER$1,000
LIGHTHOUSE FOR WOMEN$1,000
LA COUNTY ANIMAL FOUNDATION$500
LA MISSION$500
MANY MANSIONS$500
SENIOR CONCERNS$500
MANNA CONEJO VALLEY FOOD BANK$500
BUMBLE BEE FOUNDATION$500
THOUSAND OAKS ROTARY FOUNDATION$500
OPERATION SMILES$240
FOOD SHARE$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SENIOR CONCERNS: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$111k · 8 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2021, 4 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
5

Total granted

$111k
$4k

Still filing today

25%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterArts & CultureHealthInternationalFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • 5S
    5 STAR THEATRICAL
    3× · 2018–2021 · $66k
  • CM
    CABRILLO MUSIC THEATRE INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $25k · revenue -2%
  • TO
    THOUSAND OAKS ROTARY FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2021 · $6k · revenue 0%

Funded once

  • MO
    MILITARY ORDER OF WORLD WARS
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • OH
    OUR HOUSE GRIEF SUPPORT
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • BG
    BOYS GRILS CLUBS
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Culver Palms Meals On Wheels

To provide meals on the west side of Los Angeles from Pico Blvd. to LAX, delivered by volunteers to people with illness, disability, or aging who cannot plan, shop, or provide for themselves.

—
2
Torrance-Lomita Meals On Wheels Inc

Provides home delivered meals to the house bound residents of Torrance and Lomita.

—
3
Project Angel Food

Project angel food (the organization) improves health and fights food insecurity for critically ill individuals in los angeles county through its medically tailored meal program and nutrition counseling. for over 35 years, they have served…

Health
4
Long Term Care Services of Ventura Cty

The ventura county ombudsman program's mission is to assure the highest quality of life and care possible for those elderly persons in long term care, most of whom are frail and vulnerable and unable to represent themselves.

Human Services
5
Meals On Wheels of the Monterey Peninsula Inc

To empower seniors, disabled adults, veterans, and other under served populations to remain independent by nourishing their bodies, minds, and spirits, and drive out hunger and isolation in our region.

Food & Nutrition
6
Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd

Huntington Health stands for community. We stand for compassion. But more than anything, Huntington stands for health. Providing world-class health care is our specialty, and it's what we've been doing for the San Gabriel Valley since…

Health
7
Meals On Wheels of Lompoc

Lmow's mission is to end hunger for seniors and needy individuals in the lompoc area of california, by delivering nutritious meals prepared by the local hospital to them through volunteer drivers and staff.

—
8
Feeding America Riverside San Bernardino Counties

Our mission is to alleviate hunger in the inland empire of southern california.

Food & Nutrition
9
Los Angeles Regional Food Bank

The organization's mission is to mobilize resources to fight hunger in our community. to fulfill its mission, the food bank:* sources and acquires nutritious food and other products and distribute them to people experiencing nutrition…

—
10
Thesecondopinion

The organization provides free, comprehensive second opinions to adults in California diagnosed with cancer.

—
11
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
12
Rescue Mission Alliance

The rescue mission alliance's primary purpose is to establish and operate rescue missions to reach the less fortunate with the gospel of jesus christ and to assist in the feeding, clothing, and lodging of those who are destitute or…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food Share Inc; the most unlike its peers is Operation Smile Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

5 STAR THEATRICAL: $65,738 · Other5 STAR THEATRICALUNITY NORTH TAMPA: $5,000 · OtherUNITY NORTH TAMPAIndividual grant recipient: $4,000 · OtherCENTER THEATRE GP: $3,000 · Other+11 more: $11,325 · Other+11 moreCABRILLO MUSIC THEATRE INC: $24,900 · Arts & CultureCABRILLO MUSIC THEATRE …THOUSAND OAKS ROTARY FOUNDATION: $5,600 · Human ServicesCONEJO VALLEY SENIOR CONCERNS INC: $500 · Human ServicesMANY MANSIONS: $500 · Housing & ShelterLOS ANGELES MISSION INC: $500 · Housing & ShelterBUMBLEBEE FOUNDATION INC: $500 · HealthOPERATION SMILE INC: $240 · InternationalFOOD SHARE INC: $100 · Food & Nutrition
Other$89,063Arts & Culture$24,900Human Services$6,100Housing & Shelter$1,000Health$500International$240Food & Nutrition$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCABRILLO MUSIC THEATRE INC: $24,900 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetTHOUSAND OAKS ROTARY FOUNDATION: $5,600 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetCONEJO VALLEY SENIOR CONCERNS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMANY MANSIONS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUMBLEBEE FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES MISSION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $240 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD SHARE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CABRILLO MUSIC THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds THOUSAND OAKS ROTARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CONEJO VALLEY SENIOR CONCERNS INC ↗
  • Who funds MANY MANSIONS ↗
  • Who funds BUMBLEBEE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD SHARE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Selvin Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Selvin Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Selvin Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph