Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Seeds of Healing Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Human Services$60kEducation$16kYouth Development$15kReligion$8kCrime & Legal$500Health$250International$250Food & Nutrition$100Other$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALL 4 LOVE$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NEW LIFE FOR GIRLS: $25k → 9%MID-SHORE PRO BONO INC: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

35%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$46k · 3 repeat orgs$84k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +108% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
9

Total granted

$46k
$84k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+108%
+9%

Still filing today

100%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • A
    ALL4LOVE
    2× · 2024–2025 · $28k · revenue +108%
  • BB
    Big Brothers Big Sisters Of America
    2× · 2021–2022 · $12k · revenue +197%
  • RI
    REGENERATION INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $6k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • EF
    EASTON FAMILY YMCA
    one grant, 2023 · $35k
  • NL
    NEW LIFE FOR GIRLS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%
  • D
    DONORSCHOOSEORG
    one grant, 2024 · $16k · revenue -22%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gospel at New Generation Inc

Mentor to 200 plus at risk neighborhood children through personal contacts and intervention.

Youth Development
2
Loving Arms - a Crisis Pregnancy Center

Sharing the love of christ while promoting sexual integrity and bringing life affirming services to those unprepared for pregnancy or hurt by abortion

Health
3
Pure Desire Ministries International

Pure Desire exists to provide hope and freedom from sexual addiction by educating and equipping church leaders in the development of a healing ministry. Through small group resources for men, women, and teens, on-site or online counseling,…

Health
4
Grace Collective

Grace Collective is a nonprofit that offers hope and opportunity for lasting change to women survivors of poverty and exploitation. We do this by fostering a community of grace and holistic care where women learn job and life skills that…

Employment
5
Harvest Usa

The organization provides direct ministry support for individuals with sexual struggles and those impacted by them, and provides educational resources to churches to help sexual strugglers.

Health
6
All Above All

All Above All unites organizations and individuals to build a world where all people can make decisions about their reproductive healthcare free from stigma and with dignity in safe and just environments.

Civil Rights
7
Not Abandoned

To prevent sex slavery by changing the world view of affected communities and to liberate those already enslaved by providing safe environments for healing, and business opportunities that lead to full and transformed lives.

Crime & Legal
8
FOUR10 Ministries Inc

Our mission statement is sharing the love, hope and redemption of jesus christ with women in the sex industry and to equip them to live healthy, full lives.

Religion
9
The Dove Project

The dove project is a domestic violence and sexual assault agency that provides survivor services, prevention education and community programming in an effort to reduce interpersonal harm.

Crime & Legal
10
Fresno New Creation Ministries Inc

Provide help for individuals and families affected by sexual and relational brokenness.

—
11
Save a Life International Inc

Save a life international helps women in crisis; including crisis pregnancies, domestic violence, post-abortion depression and other types of hardships. they provide education and bring awareness to young people about the importance of…

Human Services
12
Cornerstone of Grace

Our mission is to offer a safe residential environment for women and their children, equipping them to face lifes challenges by building healthy relationships. We offer love, discipleship and resources to build a solid foundation for…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shore Legal Access Inc; the most unlike its peers is Poor Roberts Mission. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EASTON FAMILY YMCA: $35,000 · OtherEASTON FAMILY YMCABig Brothers Big Sisters Of America: $11,500 · OtherBig Brothers Big Sisters Of AmericaREGENERATION INC: $6,100 · OtherREGENERATION INCIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+3 more: $2,500 · OtherALL4LOVE: $28,000 · Youth DevelopmentALL4LOVENEW LIFE FOR GIRLS INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesNEW LIFE FOR GIRLS INC+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesDONORSCHOOSEORG: $16,000 · EducationDONORSCHOOSEO…Poor Roberts Mission: $100 · Food & Nutrition
Other$60,100Youth Development$28,000Human Services$25,500Education$16,000Food & Nutrition$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALL4LOVE: $28,000 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetNEW LIFE FOR GIRLS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $16,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters Of America: $11,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHORE LEGAL ACCESS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPoor Roberts Mission: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Seeds of Healing Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Seeds of Healing Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 21%
  • Big Brothers Big Sisters of America: 21% of income from government
  • Shore Legal Access Inc: 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Seeds of Healing’s filings →

More from the funding graph