Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Sedoh Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$65k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$238kPhilanthropy$97kHealth$41kHuman Services$40kEducation$27kRecreation & Sports$11kScience & Tech$2kInternational$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$3,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$110k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRANT PARK MUSIC FESTIVAL$55,000
MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART$3,000
ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO$3,000
WTTW$2,500
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 97% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $3k → 8%FRANCIS PARKER SCHOOL: $9k → 14%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $3k → 8%FRANCIS PARKER SCHOOL: $9k → 14%GIRF RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%CHICAGO JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $2k → 14%GIRF RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $3k → 14%ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $3k → 14%ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $3k → 14%ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $3k → 14%ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $3k → 14%ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $3k → 14%ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $3k → 14%ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $3k → 14%WTTW: $2k → 14%WTTW: $2k → 14%WTTW: $1k → 14%WTTW: $1k → 14%WTTW: $1k → 14%WTTW: $1k → 14%CHILDREN'S RESEARCH FUND: $10k → 14%LURIE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%LURIE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%LURIE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%LURIE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%NORTHWESTERN HOSPITAL: $8k → 14%NORTHWESTERN HOSPITAL: $8k → 14%NORTHWESTERN HOSPITAL: $8k → 14%NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FUND: $5k → 14%MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART: $3k → 14%MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART: $2k → 14%MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART: $2k → 14%MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART: $2k → 14%MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART: $2k → 14%MCA CIRCLE FELLOW: $2k → 14%GRANT PARK MUSIC FESTIVAL: $55k → 14%GRANT PARK MUSIC FESTIVAL: $25k → 14%GRANT PARK MUSIC FESTIVAL: $25k → 14%GRANT PARK MUSIC FESTIVAL: $20k → 14%GRANT PARK MUSIC FESTIVAL: $20k → 14%GRANT PARK MUSIC FESTIVAL: $10k → 14%GRANT PARK MUSIC FESTIVAL: $10k → 14%GRANT PARK MUSIC FESTIVAL: $10k → 14%GRANT PARK MUSIC FESTIVAL: $10k → 14%GRANT PARK MUSIC FESTIVAL: $5k → 14%WTTW: $3k → 14%WTTW: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$339k · 12 repeat orgs$116k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
16

Total granted

$339k
$116k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+13%

Still filing today

58%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationRecreation & SportsHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GP
    GRANT PARK ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $190k · revenue +127%
  • TA
    THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO
    8× · 2017–2025 · $21k · revenue +45%
  • FW
    Francis W Parker School
    2× · 2017–2018 · $18k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • FD
    FIDELITY DONOR ADVISED FUND
    one grant, 2019 · $91k
  • CR
    CHILDRENS RESEARCH FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • NM
    NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FUND
    one grant, 2021 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
2
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
3
Auditorium Theatre of Roosevelt University Inc

The Auditorium Theatre of Roosevelt University ("The Auditorium"), an Illinois not-for-profit corporation, is committed to presenting the finest in international, cultural, community and educational programming to Chicago and to the…

Arts & Culture
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
6
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
Loyola University of Chicago

We are chicago's jesuit, catholic university - a diverse community seeking god in all things and working to expand knowledge in the service of humanity through learning, justice, and faith.

Education
9
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

10
Toyota Technological Institute at Chicago

Achieving international impact through world-class research and education in fundamental computer science and information technology.

Education
11
Sterling and Francine Clark Art Institute

See schedule o for the organization's mission statement.please see description for part i, line 1, above.

Arts & Culture
12
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grant Park Orchestral Association and the most unlike its peers is Goldie B Wolfe Miller Women Leaders in Real Estate Initiative. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GRANT PARK ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION — $190,000 · Arts & CultureGRANT PARK ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATIONMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART — $13,645 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ARTWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC — $11,400 · Arts & CultureFIDELITY DONOR ADVISED FUND — $90,848 · OtherFIDELITY DONOR ADVISED FUNDLURIE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $40,000 · OtherLURIE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATIONNORTHWESTERN HOSPITAL — $24,000 · OtherNORTHWESTERN HOSPITALCHILDRENS RESEARCH FUND — $10,000 · OtherCHILDRENS RESEARCH FUND+16 more — $20,154 · Other+16 moreTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO — $21,000 · EducationTHE ART INS…Francis W Parker School — $18,400 · EducationFrancis W P…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $6,000 · EducationTHE BOARD O…+1 more — $500 · EducationNorthwestern University — $11,100 · Recreation & SportsALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $4,000 · Health
Arts & Culture$215,045Other$185,002Education$45,900Recreation & Sports$11,100Health$4,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGRANT PARK ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION — $190,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO — $21,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFrancis W Parker School — $18,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART — $13,645 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC — $11,400 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University — $11,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGoldie B Wolfe Miller Women Leaders in Real Estate Initiative — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GRANT PARK ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO
  • Who funds Francis W Parker School
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART
  • Who funds WINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC
  • Who funds Northwestern University
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds CHICAGO JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds Goldie B Wolfe Miller Women Leaders in Real Estate Initiative

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Sedoh Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Sedoh Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Sedoh Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph