Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Schumacher Foundation Inc

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$48k
Granted FY2026still arriving
10
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2026.

Health$41kFood & Nutrition$33kYouth Development$30kHuman Services$16kReligion$14kArts & Culture$5kHousing & Shelter$3kAnimals$2kOther$0
02FY2026 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k8 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$972k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HIGHLANDS COUNTY YOUTH FOR CHRIST$10,000
RIDGE AREA ARC$10,000
SEBRING MEALS ON WHEELS INC$5,000
AG ANGELS$5,000
NEW TESTAMENT CHURCH AND MISSION$5,000
LITTLE LAMBS INC A JOHN & EILEEN SA$3,000
HOPE MINISTRY PROJECT$3,000
CHOICES FAMILY RESOURCE CENTERS INC$3,000
CHILDREN'S MUSUEM OF HIGHLANDS$3,000
HIGHLANDS LAKESIDE THEATRE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–26, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%RIDGE AREA ARC: $10k → 16%RIDGE AREA ARC: $10k → 16%RIDGE AREA ARC: $10k → 16%RIDGE AREA ARC: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$115k · 9 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2026, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
10

Total granted

$115k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+2%

Still filing today

56%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
HealthFood & NutritionHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RA
    RIDGE AREA ARC INC
    4× · 2021–2026 · $32k · revenue +23%
  • AA
    AG ANGELS INC
    3× · 2021–2026 · $12k · revenue +18%
  • SM
    SEBRING MEALS ON WHEELS INC
    3× · 2018–2026 · $12k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • ST
    SAMARITANS TOUCH CENTER
    one grant, 2025 · $5k
  • HC
    HIGHLANDS COUNTY AG-VENTURE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +2%
  • HM
    HOPE MINISTRY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sebring Angels

To be human angels for animals, advocating for their lives, humane treatment, spay and neuter education and responsible ownership. As a foster based organization save as many dogs as possible who are in jeopardy of euthanasia at Highlands…

Unclassified
2
Saving Animals & Healing Hearts Inc

The rescue, rehabilitation and sanctuary of abused, neglected, abandoned and unwanted farm animals.

Animals
3
The Helping Hands Mission of Santa Rosa County

To provide assistance such as food, clothing and shelter to families and individuals in need

Human Services
4
Hope for Horses Equine Rescue Inc

Rescue and Rehabilitation of Equines

Animals
5
Highlands Senior Service Centerinc

To provide nutrition programs (including meals) on site and home delivery, health education, information and referral outreach, in home registery services, employment and volunteer placement for senior citizens.

Human Services
6
Daystar Hope Center of Pasco County

Daystar Hope Center of Pasco County, Inc. provides food, clothing and household items to families in need.

Human Services
7
Hope Haven Transitional Housing Inc

To provide transitional housing for homeless individuals and families, and assist them in obtaining employment and long-term housing.

Housing & Shelter
8
Maxs Horse Haven

Provide rescue and health services for horses until they can be placed in adoption or live forever at the sanctuary.

Animals
9
Hope Reins Inc

Therapeutic riding program for children and adults with disabilities including Palsy, Spina Bifida, PTSD, Autism and ADHD.

Health
10
Healing Hearts Farm Sancturary

Helping animals in need by providing refuge and fostering healing through building connections between animals and humans.

Animals
11
Serving From the Heart Ministries

We provide Hot food to those that are in need. We prepare serve and deliver meals to those who are not mobile.

—
12
Miracle Mountain Hearts for Horses Rescue & Rehabilitation Ranch Inc

Rescue and rehabilitate horses who are in a difficult situation and then re-train and re-home the horses to an environment that allows them to be successful partners with their owners.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Heartland Horses Equine Activities; the most unlike its peers is Choices Family Resource Centers Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HIGHLANDS COUNTY YOUTH FOR CHRIST: $30,000 · OtherHIGHLANDS COUNTY YOUTH FOR CHRISTNEW TESTAMENT CHURCH AND MISSION INC: $10,000 · OtherNEW TESTAMENT CHURCH AND MISSION INCSAMARITANS TOUCH CENTER: $5,000 · OtherSAMARITANS TOUCH CENTERLITTLE LAMBS INC: $4,100 · OtherLITTLE LAMBS INCCHAMPION FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $3,900 · OtherCHAMPION FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATIONCHILDREN'S MUSUEM OF HIGHLANDS: $3,000 · OtherLITTLE LAMBS INC A JOHN & EILEEN SA: $3,000 · Other+7 more: $13,100 · Other+7 moreRIDGE AREA ARC INC: $32,100 · Human ServicesRIDGE AREA ARC INCSEBRING MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $11,600 · Food & NutritionSEBRING ME…HIGHLANDS COUNTY AG-VENTURE INC: $2,300 · Food & NutritionHIGHLANDS …CHOICES FAMILY RESOURCE CENTERS INC: $7,300 · HealthCHOICES FA…SAMARITANS TOUCH CARE CENTER INC: $3,900 · HealthSAMARITANS…HEARTLAND HORSES EQUINE ACTIVITIES: $2,000 · HealthHEARTLAND …AG ANGELS INC: $12,100 · Youth DevelopmentAG ANGELS…HOPE MINISTRY PROJECT INC: $3,000 · Housing & ShelterSebring Historical Society Inc: $1,700 · Arts & Culture
Other$72,100Human Services$32,100Food & Nutrition$13,900Health$13,200Youth Development$12,100Housing & Shelter$3,000Arts & Culture$1,700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRIDGE AREA ARC INC: $32,100 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetAG ANGELS INC: $12,100 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetSEBRING MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $11,600 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetCHOICES FAMILY RESOURCE CENTERS INC: $7,300 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetHIGHLANDS COUNTY AG-VENTURE INC: $2,300 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetHEARTLAND HORSES EQUINE ACTIVITIES: $2,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RIDGE AREA ARC INC ↗
  • Who funds AG ANGELS INC ↗
  • Who funds SEBRING MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHOICES FAMILY RESOURCE CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITANS TOUCH CARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE MINISTRY PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds HIGHLANDS COUNTY AG-VENTURE INC ↗
  • Who funds HEARTLAND HORSES EQUINE ACTIVITIES ↗
  • Who funds Sebring Historical Society Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Thakkar Family FoundationFL15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Thakkar Family Foundation · The Palms Foundation of Sebring Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Schumacher Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Schumacher Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    6get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Schumacher Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Schumacher Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Schumacher’s filings →

    More from the funding graph