Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Sandy and Ed Burr Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$55k
Granted FY2023
3
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Health$545kAnimals$204kHuman Services$44kArts & Culture$26kPublic Safety & Disaster$25kMembership Benefit$20kRecreation & Sports$3kOther$0
02FY2023 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$772k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOF SUPPORT INC$25,000
GROSSMONT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$25,000
EAST COUNTY YOUTH SYMPHONY$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SOF SUPPORT INC: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$595k · 7 repeat orgs$332k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +84% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2023, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
5

Total granted

$595k
$307k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+84%
+37%

Still filing today

86%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
AnimalsHealthArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesMembership BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GH
    Grossmont Hospital Foundation
    3× · 2017–2023 · $285k · revenue +93%
  • ZS
    ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO
    5× · 2017–2022 · $79k · revenue +28%
  • SD
    SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA
    2× · 2018–2019 · $75k · revenue +93%

Funded once

  • SH
    Sharp Healthcare Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $250k · revenue +37%
  • CH
    CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • BA
    BLUE ANGELS FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $19k · revenue +170%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sharp Coronado Hospital & Healthcare Center

To operate and maintain a general acute care hospital and related facilities for the acute care of persons suffering from illnesses or disabilities, and for the continuing care of persons needing rehabilitation and the custodial care of…

2
Coronado Hospital Foundation

Coronado hospital foundation is a non profit benefit corporation dedicated to enhancing the health of the community by supporting solutions to coronado's unique health care needs.

Health
3
High Desert Police K9 Association
4
Sonoma County Deputy Sheriffs K-9 Association

To provide health care for retired k-9 deputies. educate the public in the roll k-9 deputies play in law enforcment

Crime & Legal
5
Kfhpw Holdings

Supporting kaiser permanente organizations which provide high-quality, affordable health care services to improve the health of our members and the communities we serve.

6
San Diego Police Officers Association Foundation

The san diego police officers association foundation receives charitable contributons from the public and from members of the san diego police officers association, and to engage in charitable fundraising activities.

Philanthropy
7
Grossmont Hospital Corporation

Grossmont Hospital provides inpatient and outpatient medical services to the community.

Health
8
Disabled American Veterans Department of California

Fulfilling our promises to the men and women who served.

9
San Diego Municipal Employees Assn

The san diego municipal employees association (sdmea) is dedicated to being a strong and effective advocate for san diego city employees. sdmea is united to improve employees' standard of living and promote their fair treatment by…

10
Sharp Memorial Hospital

Sharp Memorial Hospital provides comprehensive medical services to the San Diego Community.

Health
11
San Diego Police Officers Association Inc

The san diego police officers association was incorporated in 1953 to assist san diego police officers in issues related to wages, hours and working conditions.

12
Sharp Healthcare

To promote health care through supporting and/or operating, directly or through wholly-owned subsidiaries and other appropriate management arrangements, hospitals and other medically-related facilities and activities in the State of…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grossmont Hospital Foundation and the most unlike its peers is California Highway Patrol. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Grossmont Hospital Foundation — $285,000 · HealthGrossmont Hospital FoundationSharp Healthcare Foundation — $250,000 · HealthSharp Healthcare FoundationZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO — $79,000 · AnimalsZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SA…SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA — $75,000 · AnimalsSAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY…HELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER — $50,000 · AnimalsHELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CE…S OF SUPPORT (SEALS) — $60,000 · OtherTHERAPY CENTER INC DBA CHALLENGE CENTER — $10,000 · OtherLA MESA PARKS AND RECREATION — $3,300 · OtherEAST COUNTY YOUTH SYMPHONY — $26,000 · Arts & CultureCALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL — $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentSOF SUPPORT INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesCHP 11-99 FOUNDATION — $20,000 · Membership BenefitBLUE ANGELS FOUNDATION INC — $18,800 · Philanthropy
Health$535,000Animals$204,000Other$73,300Arts & Culture$26,000Youth Development$25,000Human Services$25,000Membership Benefit$20,000Philanthropy$18,800

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGrossmont Hospital Foundation — $285,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetSharp Healthcare Foundation — $250,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO — $79,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA — $75,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER — $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetEAST COUNTY YOUTH SYMPHONY — $26,000 over 6y, 6.3% of budgetCHP 11-99 FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBLUE ANGELS FOUNDATION INC — $18,800 over 1y, 1.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Sandy and Ed Burr Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2022
2021222324
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Sandy and Ed Burr Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Sandy and Ed Burr Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph