Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Sandcastle Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$60k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$61kEnvironment$58kReligion$54kHealth$36kFood & Nutrition$32kAnimals$25kEducation$24kCommunity Improvement$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$6,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIFEWORKS SERVICES$7,500
HAYWOOD CHRISTIAN MINISTRY INC$7,500
HAYWOOD COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$7,500
NOURISHING HOPE$7,000
COFAN SURVIVAL FUND$7,000
PAWS CHICAGO$6,000
ALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL CHURCH$5,000
FRIENDS OF NORTHSIDE$5,000
RAVENSWOOD COMMUNITY SERVICES$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
ALZHEIMERS ASSOC$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $62k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LIFEWORKS SERVICES: $6k → 6%RAVENSWOOD COMMUNITY SERVICES: $5k → 14%LIFEWORKS SERVICES: $6k → 6%PIGEON COMMUNITY MULTICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $11k → 12%RAVENSWOOD COMMUNITY SERVICES: $5k → 14%RAVENSWOOD COMMUNITY SERVICES: $5k → 14%RAVENSWOOD COMMUNITY SERVICES: $5k → 14%HAYWOOD CHRISTIAN MINISTRY INC: $8k → 12%PIGEON COMMUNITY MULTICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $6k → 12%PIGEON COMMUNITY MULTICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$323k · 17 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +85% since the first grant, against +46% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
8

Total granted

$323k
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+85%
+46%

Still filing today

47%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEnvironmentAnimalsCrime & LegalEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    COFAN SURVIVAL FUND INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $32k · revenue +66%
  • PC
    PAWS CHICAGO
    6× · 2020–2025 · $31k · revenue +210%
  • PC
    Pigeon Community Development Center
    3× · 2021–2023 · $22k · revenue +85%

Funded once

  • AO
    ARK OF HAYWOOD WATERWAY
    one grant, 2020 · $13k
  • AI
    ALLIANCE IMMIGRANT NEIGHBORS
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • PM
    PIGEON MULTICULTURAL CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Haywood Pathways Center Inc

Guided by faith, love, and respect, we provide food, shelter, and individualized supportive services for Haywood County residents.

Housing & Shelter
2
Haywood Street Community Development

Dignity through dwellings, connection through community.

Housing & Shelter
3
Hancock-Hardin-Wyandot-Putnam Community Action Commission

To reduce the conditions of poverty by providing comprehensive services to improve lives.to accomplish the mission, hhwp cac will collect and analyze data on the nature of poverty and the existing resources in the area. hhwp cac will…

—
4
Aging and Disability Resource Center of Brown County Inc

The adrc of brown county supports older adults, adults with disabilities, and caregivers through education, advocacy, and resources. we connect people to answers, in our center, by phone, or at home, so everyone can live with diginity and…

—
5
Joliet Area Community Hospice Corp

The mission of the lightways hospice and serious illness care is to provide comprehensive, holistic, community based support services and care for terminally ill persons, their caregivers and loved ones without regard to economic status,…

Human Services
6
Community Care Health Plan Inc

Community care health plan's mission is to develop and demonstrate innovative, flexible, community-based approaches to care for at-risk adults, in order to optimize their quality of life and optimize the allocation of community resources.

Health
7
Hayes Senior Housing Corporation

Hayes Senior Housing Corporation provides housing and services for the elderly, to meet their physical, social, and psycho-social needs.

—
8
Human Services Coalition of Tompkins County Inc

The mission of the human services coalition is to enhance the delivery of health and human services in the tompkins county area.

Community Improvement
9
Houston Area Community Services

Our mission is to provide high quality and caring services to promote healthy people and communities.

Health
10
Western Carolina Rescue Ministries Inc

Provide food, shelter, rehabilitation and christian ministry to the poor and homeless

Housing & Shelter
11
Goodwill Industries of Northern Il and Wi Stateline Area Inc

The mission of goodwill is to create opportunities for individuals with barriers to enhance their lives. barriers include physical or mental disabilities, lack of education and job preparation, socio-economic disadvantages, and others.…

—
12
Life Crisis Center Inc

To improve the quality of life in our community through crisis intervention and violence prevention.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifeworks Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cofan Survival Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $36,500 · OtherALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL CHURCHLIFEWORKS SERVICES: $21,500 · OtherLIFEWORKS SERVICESNOURISHING HOPE: $21,000 · OtherNOURISHING HOPELURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $20,000 · OtherLURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITALFRIENDS OF NORTHSIDE: $20,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF NORTHSIDERAVENSWOOD COMMUNITY CENTER: $15,000 · OtherRAVENSWOOD COMMUNITY CENTERARK OF HAYWOOD WATERWAY: $13,000 · OtherARK OF HAYWOOD WATERWAYFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $11,000 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCHFRIENDS OF LANE TECH: $10,000 · Other+9 more: $31,000 · Other+9 morePigeon Community Development Center: $22,000 · Human ServicesPigeon Community D…RAVENSWOOD COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesRAVENSWOOD COMMUNI…LIFEWORKS SERVICES INC: $12,000 · Human ServicesLIFEWORKS SERVICES…Haywood Christian Ministry Inc: $7,500 · Human ServicesHaywood Christian …COFAN SURVIVAL FUND INC: $32,000 · EnvironmentCOFAN SURVIVAL F…HAYWOOD WATERWAYS ASSOCIATION INC: $20,000 · EnvironmentHAYWOOD WATERWAY…PAWS CHICAGO: $31,000 · AnimalsPAWS CHIC…Haywood Community College Found: $21,500 · EducationLIFE-SPAN: $3,000 · Crime & LegalALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $200 · Health
Other$199,000Human Services$61,500Environment$52,000Animals$31,000Education$21,500Crime & Legal$3,000Health$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOFAN SURVIVAL FUND INC: $32,000 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetPAWS CHICAGO: $31,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPigeon Community Development Center: $22,000 over 3y, 6.4% of budgetHaywood Community College Found: $21,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetNOURISHING HOPE: $21,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHAYWOOD WATERWAYS ASSOCIATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetRAVENSWOOD COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetLIFEWORKS SERVICES INC: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARC OF HAYWOOD COUNTY INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COFAN SURVIVAL FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds PAWS CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds Pigeon Community Development Center ↗
  • Who funds Haywood Community College Found ↗
  • Who funds NOURISHING HOPE ↗
  • Who funds HAYWOOD WATERWAYS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RAVENSWOOD COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFEWORKS SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Haywood Christian Ministry Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC OF HAYWOOD COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFE-SPAN ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE6.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Sandcastle Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Sandcastle Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Sandcastle Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Sandcastle Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sandcastle’s filings →

    More from the funding graph