Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Sam & Sonia Wilson Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$11k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

69% of The Sam & Sonia Wilson Family Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Austin Community Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

1
’18
3
’19
3
’20
2
’21
1
’22
2
’23
0
’24
1
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Philanthropy$554kArts & Culture$131kEducation$94kHuman Services$11kEmployment$8kCommunity Improvement$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$11,205
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC$11,205
BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 5% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN: $5k → 6%HELPING HAND: $500 → 8%BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN: $3k → 6%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$211k · 14 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
15

Total granted

$211k
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-14%
-5%

Still filing today

29%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    4× · 2018–2021 · $56k
  • NH
    NEIL-COCHRAN HOUSE MUSEUM
    4× · 2020–2023 · $36k
  • HB
    HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL
    6× · 2018–2023 · $34k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
  • SA
    ST ANDREW'S SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • BS
    BAYLOR SCOTT & WHITE
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Austin Habitat for Humanity Inc

Through faith in action, austin habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
2
Houston Christian University

The mission of houston christian university is to provide a learning experience that instills in students a passion for academic, spiritual, and professional excellence as a result of our central confession, "jesus christ is lord."

—
3
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
4
Houston Botanic Garden

To enrich life through discovery, education, and the conservation of plants and the natural environment.

Environment
5
Austin Home Base

To offer a community where students love learning, teachers love teaching, and families thrive.

Education
6
Central Houston Inc

See schedule ocentral houston champions a thriving downtown by connecting influential leaders through initiatives that advance the future of business and community for all.

—
7
University of Texas Inter-Cooperative Council Inc

Our mission is to provide quality, affordable, and healthy cooperative housing for students with financial need.

Housing & Shelter
8
Oklahoma Hall of Fame

The oklahoma hall of fame preserves oklahomas unique history while promoting pride in our great state through each of its programs and the gaylord-pickens museum. the association honors our states rich tradition by telling oklahomas story…

Arts & Culture
9
Austin Area Foundation

Support nonprofit organizations by managing & distributing charitable gifts

Philanthropy
10
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
11
Houston Habitat for Humanity Inc

Seeking to put God's love into action, Houston Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to provide a world where everyone has a decent place to live.

Housing & Shelter
12
Austin Affordable Housing Corporation

To ensure and preserve quality, affordable housing opportunities for low- to moderate-income families in austin as well as provide financial literacy and homeownership opportunities.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Austin Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Austin Womans Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
2/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $535,277 · PhilanthropyAUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INCIndividual grant recipient: $55,650 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNEIL-COCHRAN HOUSE MUSEUM: $35,700 · OtherNEIL-COCHRAN HOUSE MUSEUMHARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL: $33,500 · OtherHARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOLAUSTIN SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $20,000 · OtherAUSTIN SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAJAMES COX FOUNDATION: $19,000 · OtherJAMES COX FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPHI GAMMA DELTA EDUCATION: $12,000 · OtherST ANDREW'S SCHOOL: $10,000 · OtherBAYLOR SCOTT & WHITE: $10,000 · Other+13 more: $32,961 · Other+13 moreAustin Womans Club: $11,500 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $200 · Arts & CultureBROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN VOCATIONAL INC: $8,250 · Human ServicesHELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC: $500 · Human ServicesHELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC: $500 · Human ServicesUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $4,500 · EducationHOCKADAY SCHOOL: $1,500 · Education
Philanthropy$535,277Other$243,811Arts & Culture$11,700Human Services$9,250Education$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $535,277 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetAustin Womans Club: $11,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetBROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN VOCATIONAL INC: $8,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOCKADAY SCHOOL: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL OF TEXAS PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COUNCIL: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Austin Womans Club ↗
  • Who funds BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN VOCATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HOCKADAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds CAPITAL OF TEXAS PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COUNCIL ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Sam & Sonia Wilson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Sam & Sonia Wilson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sam & Sonia Wilson Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph