Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Sam & Sonia Wilson Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$11k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

69% of The Sam & Sonia Wilson Family Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Austin Community Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

1
18
3
19
3
20
2
21
1
22
2
23
0
24
1
25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Philanthropy$554kArts & Culture$131kEducation$94kHuman Services$11kEmployment$8kCommunity Improvement$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$11,205
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC$11,205
BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 5% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN: $5k → 6%HELPING HAND: $500 → 8%BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN: $3k → 6%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$211k · 14 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
15

Total granted

$211k
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-14%
-5%

Still filing today

29%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    4× · 2018–2021 · $56k
  • NH
    NEIL-COCHRAN HOUSE MUSEUM
    4× · 2020–2023 · $36k
  • HB
    HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL
    6× · 2018–2023 · $34k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
  • BS
    BAYLOR SCOTT & WHITE
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • SA
    ST ANDREW'S SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Austin Habitat for Humanity Inc

Through faith in action, austin habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

2
Houston Christian University

The mission of houston christian university is to provide a learning experience that instills in students a passion for academic, spiritual, and professional excellence as a result of our central confession, "jesus christ is lord."

3
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
4
Houston Botanic Garden

To enrich life through discovery, education, and the conservation of plants and the natural environment.

Environment
5
Austin Home Base

To offer a community where students love learning, teachers love teaching, and families thrive.

Education
6
Central Houston Inc

See schedule ocentral houston champions a thriving downtown by connecting influential leaders through initiatives that advance the future of business and community for all.

7
University of Texas Inter-Cooperative Council Inc

Our mission is to provide quality, affordable, and healthy cooperative housing for students with financial need.

Housing & Shelter
8
Oklahoma Hall of Fame

The oklahoma hall of fame preserves oklahomas unique history while promoting pride in our great state through each of its programs and the gaylord-pickens museum. the association honors our states rich tradition by telling oklahomas story…

Arts & Culture
9
Austin Area Foundation

Support nonprofit organizations by managing & distributing charitable gifts

Philanthropy
10
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
11
Houston Habitat for Humanity Inc

Seeking to put God's love into action, Houston Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to provide a world where everyone has a decent place to live.

Housing & Shelter
12
Austin Affordable Housing Corporation

To ensure and preserve quality, affordable housing opportunities for low- to moderate-income families in austin as well as provide financial literacy and homeownership opportunities.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Austin Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Austin Womans Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
2/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $535,277 · PhilanthropyAUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INCIndividual grant recipient — $55,650 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNEIL-COCHRAN HOUSE MUSEUM — $35,700 · OtherNEIL-COCHRAN HOUSE MUSEUMHARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL — $33,500 · OtherHARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOLAUSTIN SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA — $20,000 · OtherAUSTIN SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAJAMES COX FOUNDATION — $19,000 · OtherJAMES COX FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPHI GAMMA DELTA EDUCATION — $12,000 · OtherBAYLOR SCOTT & WHITE — $10,000 · OtherST ANDREW'S SCHOOL — $10,000 · Other+13 more — $32,961 · Other+13 moreAustin Womans Club — $11,500 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $200 · Arts & CultureBROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN VOCATIONAL INC — $8,250 · Human ServicesHELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC — $500 · Human ServicesHELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC — $500 · Human ServicesUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC — $4,500 · EducationHOCKADAY SCHOOL — $1,500 · Education
Philanthropy$535,277Other$243,811Arts & Culture$11,700Human Services$9,250Education$6,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $535,277 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetAustin Womans Club — $11,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetBROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN VOCATIONAL INC — $8,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC — $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOCKADAY SCHOOL — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL OF TEXAS PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COUNCIL — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Austin Womans Club
  • Who funds BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN VOCATIONAL INC
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds HOCKADAY SCHOOL
  • Who funds HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC
  • Who funds HELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC
  • Who funds CAPITAL OF TEXAS PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COUNCIL

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Sam & Sonia Wilson Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph