Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Rotary Club of Lawrence Inc

Provide educational, humanitarian, and cultural programs

$36k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$13k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of The Rotary Club of Lawrence Inc’s FY2025 grant dollars went to The Rotary Foundation Of Rotary International, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

8
17
0
19
1
20
0
21
0
22
0
23
0
24
0
25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0185% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

International$163kEducation$25kFood & Nutrition$9kHealth$8kHousing & Shelter$2kEnvironment$686Human Services$393Arts & Culture$374Other$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 1 grants below total $12,581 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $36,396 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $23,815 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$12,581
Median grant
1
States reached
$101k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Rotary International Foundation$12,581
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

Your US giving89% of grant dollars ($200k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 11% that went abroad ($24k) is mapped below.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $298) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%LINK: $298 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Beyond the US11% of all-years giving ($24k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
United Kingdom$24k · 1 grant

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lawrence Farmers Market

The mission of the Lawrence Farmers Market is to provide children and adults in the Lawrence, KS area, with locally grown foods and farm products. This will be accomplished by improving access to local, healthy, affordable food through a…

Religion
2
People in Need - Lawrence County

Help nbsp;people nbsp;face nbsp;challlenges nbsp;one nbsp;step nbsp;at nbsp;a nbsp;time nbsp;create nbsp;supportive nbsp;structures nbsp;to nbsp;help nbsp;individuals nbsp;and nbsp;families nbsp;make nbsp;positve nbsp;changes nbsp;and…

Human Services
3
Lawrence Humane Society

The lawrence humane society nurtures the human-animal bond by providing shelter, care and advocacy for homeless and abused animals, as well as resource for the pets and people in our community

Animals
4
Good Samaritan Center of Douglas County Inc

The Good Samaritan Center of Douglas County demonstrates the love and acceptance of individuals and families through encouragement, provision of food and other resources, while enabling them to maintain their dignity and self-respect. Our…

Human Services
5
Quality Care Services Inc

Provide usda meals to qualified daycare centers

Food & Nutrition
6
Heartland Medical Clinic Inc

Heartland offers high-quality, affordable, behavior ally-enhanced primary care to all community members regardless of income or insurance status. heartland is dedicated to practicing holistic, integrated health care in a model that focuses…

Health
7
Laramie Soup Kitchen

The laramie soup kitchen is a nonprofit organization working to increase access to quality, nutritious food so that every person who is hungry or alone may share a meal without cost. its mission is to improve the quality of life for its…

Human Services
8
Lincoln County Dental Inc

Lincoln county dental clinics mission is to provide access to dental care to adults and children who live at or below 200 percent of the federal poverty level and have no dental home.

Health
9
Outreach Foodshelf

To feed the hungry in our service area through an efficient system of collection and distribution of food to individuals, striving to preserve dignity and extending respect to all clients in douglas county.

Food & Nutrition
10
Douglas County Mental Health & Family Counseling Association Inc

To provide quality services in a comfortable, empathetic environment to persons suffering from a mental illness or emotional disturbance and to return them to a higher quality of life.

Health
11
Ozark Action Inc

To coordinate and provide services for people with needs so they can improve their quality of life.

Human Services
12
North Central Kansas Housing Opportunities Inc
Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lawrence Community Shelter Inc and the most unlike its peers is Elizabeth Ballard Community Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL — $162,604 · InternationalTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONALLondon University — $24,349 · OtherLondon UniversityIndividual grant recipient — $12,921 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJUST FOOD OF DOUGLAS COUNTY KS INC — $6,529 · OtherJUST FOOD OF DOUGLAS COUNTY …DOUGLAS COUNTY DENTAL CLINIC INC — $4,900 · OtherDOUGLAS COUNTY DENTAL CLINIC…Douglas County Visiting Nurses — $2,700 · OtherRYLA — $1,950 · Other+7 more — $2,630 · OtherLAWRENCE COMMUNITY SHELTER INC — $2,000 · Housing & ShelterWARM HEARTS OF DOUGLAS COUNTY INC — $686 · Housing & ShelterLAWRENCE MEALS ON WHEELS INC — $2,400 · Food & NutritionLINK INC — $298 · Human Services
International$162,604Other$55,979Housing & Shelter$2,686Food & Nutrition$2,400Human Services$298

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL — $162,604 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetJUST FOOD OF DOUGLAS COUNTY KS INC — $6,529 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDOUGLAS COUNTY DENTAL CLINIC INC — $4,900 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLAWRENCE MEALS ON WHEELS INC — $2,400 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetLAWRENCE COMMUNITY SHELTER INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWARM HEARTS OF DOUGLAS COUNTY INC — $686 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSHELTER INC — $393 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLINK INC — $298 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds JUST FOOD OF DOUGLAS COUNTY KS INC
  • Who funds DOUGLAS COUNTY DENTAL CLINIC INC
  • Who funds LAWRENCE MEALS ON WHEELS INC
  • Who funds LAWRENCE COMMUNITY SHELTER INC
  • Who funds WARM HEARTS OF DOUGLAS COUNTY INC
  • Who funds SHELTER INC
  • Who funds LINK INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Douglas County Community FoundationKS17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Douglas County Community Foundation · United Way of Douglas County Inc · Ethel & Raymond F Rice Foundation · Midcontinent Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Rotary Club of Lawrence Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph