Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Ross Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$75k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$163kCommunity Improvement$73kRecreation & Sports$68kScience & Tech$60kReligion$41kPublic Safety & Disaster$28kHuman Services$9kArts & Culture$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
$4,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$20,000
TULSA TOUGH INC$20,000
OSU$10,000
THE ROCK HOUSE CHURCH$7,500
PANHANDLE STATE FOUNDATION$4,000
CHOCTAW-NICOMA PARK SCHOOL DISTRICT$3,000
STROUD PUBLIC SCHOOLS$3,000
NEO A&M$2,500
SALVATION ARMY SOUTH$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 83% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE: $25k → 8%GIVERGY CHARITY EVENT: $5k → 17%RUTS N GUTS: $5k → 9%ROGERS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $8k → 10%PANHANDLE STATE FOUNDATION: $4k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%STROUD PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $3k → 15%ROUTE 66 ALLIANCE: $73k → 15%NORTHERN OKLAHOMA COLLEGE: $3k → 16%CHOCTAW-NICOMA PARK SCHOOL DISTRICT: $3k → 16%OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY: $8k → 19%OSU: $10k → 19%NEO A&M: $3k → 20%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $25k → 8%NORTHEASTERN STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 9%THE ROCK HOUSE CHURCH: $8k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%STROUD PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $3k → 15%MONTE CASSINO - BRICK BY BRICK: $2k → 15%FRIENDS OF THE MANSION: $2k → 16%OSU IT: $2k → 19%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE: $25k → 8%THE ROCK HOUSE CHURCH: $5k → 10%BIKE CLUB: $3k → 15%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE: $10k → 8%THE ROCK HOUSE CHURCH: $5k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF TULSA: $25k → 15%THE ROCK HOUSE CHURCH: $5k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF TULSA: $7k → 15%THE ROCK HOUSE CHURCH: $5k → 10%THE ROCK HOUSE CHURCH: $5k → 10%THE ROCK HOUSE CHURCH: $4k → 10%TULSA HUB: $3k → 15%THE ROCK HOUSE CHURCH: $4k → 10%TULSA POLICE HEROES COMMITTEE: $3k → 15%THE PARENT CHILD CENTER OF TULSA: $6k → 15%SALVATION ARMY SOUTH: $3k → 15%TULSA POLICE HEROES FUND: $25k → 15%BOOKER T WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $15k → 15%OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 15%BISHOP KELLEY: $20k → 15%BISHOP KELLEY: $20k → 15%TULSA TOUGH INC: $25k → 15%TULSA TOUGH INC: $20k → 15%TULSA TOUGH: $10k → 15%TULSA TOUGH INC: $10k → 15%JOHN HOPE FRANKLIN CENTER: $5k → 15%CHILD ABUSE NETWORK INC: $3k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$325k · 10 repeat orgs$185k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
18

Total granted

$325k
$161k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+45%

Still filing today

50%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyInternationalCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TT
    Tulsa ToughInc
    4× · 2020–2024 · $65k · revenue +358%
  • The University of Tulsa
    2× · 2017–2018 · $32k · revenue +8%
  • TG
    TULSA GLOBAL ALLIANCE
    3× · 2017–2019 · $4k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • R6
    ROUTE 66 ALLIANCE INC
    one grant, 2017 · $73k
  • TP
    TULSA POLICE HEROES FUND
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • A
    ANONYMOUS
    one grant, 2021 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Foundation for Tulsa Schools

The Foundation for Tulsa Schools was established to build a stronger community through the support of Tulsa Public Schools.

Education
2
Oklahoma Newspaper Foundation
Arts & Culture
3
Oklahoma Educational Memorial Trust Fdn

Providing, maintaining and issuing scholarships to eligible nominees or applicants for admission to college or for contributions to regularly maintained scholarship funds of other federal tax exempt colleges and universities with an…

Education
4
Pi Beta Phi Foundation of Okc
Philanthropy
5
Tulsa Honor Academy Inc

The operation of a public charter school in the tulsa area with the mission to equip all scholars with the academic skills, content knowledge, and ethical character required for college graduation and life success.

Education
6
Tulsa School of Arts and Sciences

The mission of tsas middle and high school is to provide students a multi-strand liberal arts education in a safe, supportive, individualized and challenging school environment through a college preparatory curriculum.

Education
7
Oklahoma City University

Inspired by a culture of creativity, Oklahoma City University fosters an immersive, personalized experience that welcomes and prepares students to pursue boundless opportunities.

Education
8
The Harry S Truman Library Institute National and International Affairs

To preserve and promote the enduring legacy of harry s. truman, america's 33rd president.

Education
9
Tulsa Press Club Foundation Inc

Organized exclusively for charitable and educational purposes, specifically for the sole benefit of Tulsa Press Club Benevolent Association, Inc. to aid in carrying out the mission to promote the highest standards of journalism and to…

Community Improvement
10
Tulsa Legacy Charter School

To prepare students for college through a rigorous arts infused program.

Education
11
Kipp Tulsa Academy College Prep Inc

Kipp tulsa prepares students from educationally under-served neighborhoods in tulsa, ok with the academic, character and life skills necessary for success in college and the competitive world beyond.

Education
12
Oklahoma Scholarship Fund Inc
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Oklahoma Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Parent Child Ctr of Tulsa Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ROUTE 66 ALLIANCE INC: $72,934 · OtherROUTE 66 ALLIANCE INCMASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE: $60,000 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTETHE ROCK HOUSE CHURCH: $40,500 · OtherTHE ROCK HOUSE CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTULSA POLICE HEROES FUND: $25,000 · OtherTULSA POLICE HEROES FUNDANONYMOUS: $13,000 · OtherOKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY: $12,500 · Other+15 more: $56,500 · Other+15 moreThe University of Tulsa: $32,000 · EducationThe University of …Massachusetts Institute of Technology: $25,000 · EducationMassachusetts Inst…UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF OKLA…Rogers State University Foundation: $7,500 · EducationRogers State Unive…PANHANDLE STATE FOUNDATION: $4,000 · Education+1 more: $500 · EducationTulsa ToughInc: $65,000 · HealthTulsa ToughIn…BOOKER T WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $45,435 · PhilanthropyBOOKER T …JOHN HOPE FRANKLIN CENTER FOR RECONCILIATION INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF THE MANSION INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureTULSA GLOBAL ALLIANCE: $4,000 · InternationalChild Abuse Network Inc dba Child Advocacy Network: $3,000 · Crime & LegalGlobal Gardens Incorporated: $2,000 · Youth Development
Other$320,434Education$89,000Health$65,000Philanthropy$45,435Arts & Culture$7,000International$4,000Crime & Legal$3,000Youth Development$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTulsa ToughInc: $65,000 over 4y, 7.9% of budgetBOOKER T WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $45,435 over 2y, 13% of budgetThe University of Tulsa: $32,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRogers State University Foundation: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE PARENT CHILD CTR OF TULSA INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJOHN HOPE FRANKLIN CENTER FOR RECONCILIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetTULSA GLOBAL ALLIANCE: $4,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetPANHANDLE STATE FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE MANSION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGlobal Gardens Incorporated: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe Pencil Box Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Tulsa ToughInc ↗
  • Who funds BOOKER T WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The University of Tulsa ↗
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Rogers State University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE PARENT CHILD CTR OF TULSA INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHN HOPE FRANKLIN CENTER FOR RECONCILIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TULSA GLOBAL ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds PANHANDLE STATE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Child Abuse Network Inc dba Child Advocacy Network ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE MANSION INC ↗
  • Who funds Global Gardens Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds The Pencil Box Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tulsa Community FoundationOK26.2× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tulsa Community Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Lobeck Taylor Family Foundation · Mervin Bovaird Foundation · The Hardesty Family Foundation Inc · One Gas Foundation Inc · Charles and Lynn Schusterman Family Foundation · Stuart Family Foundation · Hille Family Charitable Foundation · Saint Francis Hospital Inc · The Gelvin Foundation · The Sharna and Irvin Frank Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Ross Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ross Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 20%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • Rogers State University Foundation: 20% of income from government
  • The University of Tulsa: 5% of income from government
  • Global Gardens Incorporated: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Ross Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Ross Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ross’ filings →

More from the funding graph