Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Rosanne H Silbermann Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$380k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$4.2MFood & Nutrition$166kHuman Services$63kArts & Culture$29kReligion$16kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kPhilanthropy$7kCrime & Legal$5k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $15k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $365k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$7.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER$100,000
WEILL CORNELL MEDICINE - PEDIATRIC IBD$100,000
ST BARNABAS MEDICAL CENTER$90,000
WEILL CORNELL MEDICINE - GERIATRICS$75,000
MOSTLY MODERN PROJECTS$5,000
COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF NEW JERSEY$2,000
TABLE TO TABLE$2,000
MARKET STREET MISSION$2,000
MEND - HUNGER RELIEF NETWORK$2,000
NOURISH NJ$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $68k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 56% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%OPERATION WARM: $10k → 10%HOUR CHILDERN INC: $10k → 13%OPERATION WARM: $10k → 10%HOUR CHILDREN INC: $10k → 13%OPERATION WARM: $10k → 10%HOUR CHILDREN: $5k → 13%LIFETOWN: $13k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.2M · 17 repeat orgs$305k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
9

Total granted

$4.2M
$230k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+62%

Still filing today

59%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OW
    Operation Warm Inc
    3× · 2020–2022 · $30k · revenue +172%
  • MM
    MOSTLY MODERN PROJECTS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $29k · revenue +266%
  • CF
    Community Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc
    5× · 2020–2025 · $28k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • UC
    UCLA CARDIAC ARRHYTHMIA CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • WC
    WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE - GERIATRICS
    one grant, 2024 · $75k
  • LT
    Life Town Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $13k · revenue +84%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

2
New York Common Pantry

New york common pantry reduces hunger while promoting dignity, health and self-sufficiency.

Food & Nutrition
3
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
4
Island Harvest Ltd

The mission of island harvest is to end hunger and reduce food waste on long island.

Human Services
5
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

6
Capital Area Food Bank Inc

The mission of the capital area food bank (the food bank or cafb) is to help our neighbors thrive by creating more equitable access to food and opportunity through community partnerships.

Food & Nutrition
7
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley

To realize our vision of a hunger free community we will provide more food, healthy food and better access to food. we will leverage our own resources and also work with partners in the community.

Food & Nutrition
8
The Food Bank for Larimer County

To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.

Food & Nutrition
9
Meals for Good Inc

To reduce food insecurity for all people living in New York City by increasing access and choice to culturally relevant healthy food. We envision a time when everyone in NYC will have equitable access to a variety of healthy, fresh food.…

Food & Nutrition
10
Food Bank Association of New York State

The mission of feeding new york state is to lead a unified effort for a hunger-free state of new york. the mission of food banking is to obtain food and deliver it to emergency food programs. feeding new york state works to end hunger by…

Food & Nutrition
11
Harvest Home Farmer's Market Inc

Harvest Home Farmers Market provides low-income communities with access to farm fresh local produce and the education to achieve healthier lifestyles.

Food & Nutrition
12
Second Harvest Food Bank of Metrolina Inc

To feed people by soliciting and distributing food and other products through partner agencies and educating the community about the nature of and solutions to problems of hunger.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Food Bank of New Jersey Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mostly Modern Projects Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST BARNABAS MEDICAL CENTER — $1,390,000 · OtherST BARNABAS MEDICAL CENTERWEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE — $1,225,000 · OtherWEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGEMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $900,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTERWEILL CORNELL MEDICINE - PEDIATRIC IBD — $200,000 · OtherRWJ BARNABAS HEALTH FOUNDATION — $186,500 · Other+8 more — $290,000 · Other+8 moreNOURISHNJ INC — $29,000 · Food & NutritionCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc — $28,000 · Food & NutritionCITY HARVEST INC — $25,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding America — $25,000 · Food & NutritionCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS — $15,000 · Food & NutritionTABLE TO TABLE INC — $14,000 · Food & NutritionGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC — $10,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more — $2,000 · Food & NutritionOperation Warm Inc — $30,000 · Human ServicesHOUR CHILDREN INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesLife Town Inc — $13,000 · Human ServicesMOSTLY MODERN PROJECTS INC — $28,500 · Arts & CultureFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY — $14,000 · Community ImprovementTHE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $10,000 · HealthCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $4,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY — $3,000 · Philanthropy
Other$4,191,500Food & Nutrition$148,000Human Services$68,000Arts & Culture$28,500Community Improvement$14,000Health$10,000Philanthropy$7,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOperation Warm Inc — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNOURISHNJ INC — $29,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetMOSTLY MODERN PROJECTS INC — $28,500 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc — $28,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC — $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America — $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOUR CHILDREN INC — $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY — $14,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTABLE TO TABLE INC — $14,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLife Town Inc — $13,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRETHINK FOOD NYC INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Operation Warm Inc
  • Who funds NOURISHNJ INC
  • Who funds MOSTLY MODERN PROJECTS INC
  • Who funds Community Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc
  • Who funds CITY HARVEST INC
  • Who funds Feeding America
  • Who funds HOUR CHILDREN INC
  • Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY
  • Who funds TABLE TO TABLE INC
  • Who funds Life Town Inc
  • Who funds THE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY
  • Who funds RETHINK FOOD NYC INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCA7.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Rosanne H Silbermann Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 27%
  • Nourishnj Inc27% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph