Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Ron and Donna Lubin Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10k
Granted FY2022
10
Grants FY2022
5
States reached
$3k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

78% of The Ron and Donna Lubin Family Foundation Inc’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 2 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year The Ron and Donna Lubin Family Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $10k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

2
19
6
20
4
21
6
22
5
23
2
24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0180% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Philanthropy$45kFood & Nutrition$16kHealth$13kHuman Services$2kCommunity Improvement$1kHousing & Shelter$500Public Safety & Disaster$500Animals$75Other$0
02FY2022 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$781
Median grant
5
States reached
$538k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OTHER$3,150
FRANKLIN FOOD BANK$2,500
CHILDREN'S SPECIALIZED HOSPITAL$1,000
SHRINERS HOSPITAL$1,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$781
Individual grant recipient$575
HEALTH TREE FOUNDATION$500
TRENTON AREA SOUP KITCHEN$500
THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION$100
Individual grant recipient$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%American Red Cross: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
WY
IN
PA
NJ
UT
VA
DC
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$30k · 9 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2022, 2 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call). Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
10

Total granted

$30k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+27%

Still filing today

44%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionPhilanthropyAnimalsEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP FOOD BANK
    3× · 2022–2024 · $10k · revenue +37%
  • TASK Inc Trenton Area Soup Kitchen Inc
    2× · 2020–2022 · $750 · revenue +58%
  • THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH
    2× · 2021–2022 · $615 · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • RC
    Renaissance Chart Foundation
    one grant, 2021 · $11k
  • NF
    Network For Good Community
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • AL
    ALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +23%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
2
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

3
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
4
Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Inc

To create and lead alliances and public-private partnerships that advance breakthrough biomedical discoveries and improve the quality of people's lives

Health
5
Blood Cancer United Inc

Our mission is to cure leukemia, lymphoma, hodgkin's disease and myeloma, and improve the quality of life of patients and their families.

Health
6
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
7
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
8
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
9
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
10
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
11
Breakthrough T1D

Breakthrough t1d is the leading global t1d organization working to accelerate life-changing breakthroughs to cure, prevent, and treat t1d and its complications.

Health
12
Critical Path Institute

The critical path institute is a catalyst in the development of new approaches that advance medical innovation and regulatory science. this is achieved by leading teams that share data, knowledge and expertise resulting in sound, consensus…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches and the most unlike its peers is Brookline Labrador Retriever Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/18
Grantees still filing
15/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Renaissance Chart Foundation — $11,000 · OtherRenaissance Chart FoundationFRANKLIN TOWNSHIP FOOD BANK — $10,000 · OtherFRANKLIN TOWNSHIP FOOD BANKHillsborough TWP Food Bank — $5,000 · OtherHillsborough TWP Food BankOTHER — $4,765 · OtherOTHERSHRINERS HOSPITAL — $2,050 · Other+9 more — $6,505 · Other+9 moreRenaissance Charitable Foundation Inc — $32,510 · PhilanthropyRenaissance Charitable Foundation Inc+1 more — $200 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $5,681 · HealthAMERICAN CANC…The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc — $1,500 · HealthThe Susan G K…CHILDREN'S SPECIALIZED HOSPITAL — $1,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S SP…THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH — $615 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J…HealthTree Foundation Inc — $500 · Health+3 more — $500 · HealthTASK Inc Trenton Area Soup Kitchen Inc — $750 · Food & NutritionAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $500 · Human ServicesBROOKLINE LABRADOR RETRIEVER RESCUE — $75 · AnimalsMIDLAND FOUNDATION — $50 · Education
Other$39,320Philanthropy$32,710Health$9,796Food & Nutrition$750Human Services$500Animals$75Education$50

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRenaissance Charitable Foundation Inc — $32,510 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRANKLIN TOWNSHIP FOOD BANK — $10,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $5,681 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARTIES OF NORTHEASTERN PENSYLVANIA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTASK Inc Trenton Area Soup Kitchen Inc — $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH — $615 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHealthTree Foundation Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSteps Together A NJ Non Profit — $200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ASSOCIATION FOR FRONTOTEMPORAL DEGENERATION — $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association — $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKLINE LABRADOR RETRIEVER RESCUE — $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIDLAND FOUNDATION — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC10.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Ron and Donna Lubin Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph