Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

South Carolina · Private foundation

The Rodney and Vicki Mott Foundation

Its FY2017 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$385k
Granted FY2017
6
Grants FY2017
6
Organizations funded FY2017
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2017
$45,000
Largest grant, FY2017
$125,000
States reached, FY2017
2
Total assets, FY2017
$279k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2017, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Charleston Animal Society$125,00012%
Pet Helpers Inc$125,00018%
East Cooper Meals on Wheels Inc$45,00014%
East Cooper Community Outreach$40,00012%
East Cooper Pet Relief$25,0001n/a

Plus 1 recipient with no EIN on record ($25k), not named here.

Compare The Rodney and Vicki Mott Foundation with peer funders

About The Rodney and Vicki Mott Foundation

How much does The Rodney and Vicki Mott Foundation give?
The Rodney and Vicki Mott Foundation reported 6 grants totaling $385,000 in its FY2017 IRS filing.
What does The Rodney and Vicki Mott Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2017, its largest causes are Animals (71%), Food & Nutrition (12%), Human Services (10%).
Who are The Rodney and Vicki Mott Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2017: Charleston Animal Society ($125k), Pet Helpers Inc ($125k), East Cooper Meals on Wheels Inc ($45k).
Does The Rodney and Vicki Mott Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Where is The Rodney and Vicki Mott Foundation based?
The Rodney and Vicki Mott Foundation is based in SC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rodney and Vicki Mott’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home