Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Robert F & Myrna L Krohn Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$70k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$253kEducation$67kPhilanthropy$62kHousing & Shelter$61kHealth$56kArts & Culture$42kRecreation & Sports$38kEnvironment$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$920k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DUNDEE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$25,200
NORTH STAR FOUNDATION$10,000
ALBION ROSE HILL CEMETERY$10,000
NATURE CONSERVANCY$5,000
OMAHA PERFORMING ARTS$5,000
LAURITZEN GARDENS$5,000
SHELTERING TREE$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION$1,000
FRED & PAM BUFFET CANCER CENTER$900
MEYER FOUNDATION$500
LAKESIDE SCHOLARSHIP FUND$500
MONROE MEYER INSTITUTE FOR GENETICS$500
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH - MEMORIAL$300
BOONE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$300
ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ARIZONA PBS: $1k → 11%BOONE COUNTY AREA FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%NE CATTLEMENS BALL: $3k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $30k → 13%MAYO CLINIC CANCER CENTER: $20k → 9%JUDICIAL WATCH: $2k → 14%VALLEY TIGER BOOSTER CLUB: $10k → 5%EAGLE VALLEY LAND TRUST: $3k → 7%YOUNG AMERICA'S FOUNDATION: $5k → 6%BOONE COUNTY AREA FOUNDATION: $12k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $20k → 13%MAYO CLINIC CANCER CENTER: $5k → 9%YOUNG AMERICA'S FOUNDATION: $2k → 6%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $5k → 7%ALBION ROSE HILL CEMETERY: $10k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%MAYO CLINIC CANCER CENTER: $3k → 9%GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY: $3k → 10%RONALD REAGAN PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%NORTH STAR FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%DUNDEE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $83k → 12%THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%DUNDEE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $67k → 12%DUNDEE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $57k → 12%DUNDEE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $25k → 12%NET FOUNDATION: $3k → 13%DUNDEE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $17k → 12%NET FOUNDATION: $2k → 13%NET FOUNDATION: $1k → 13%OMAHA COMMUNITY PLAYHOUSE: $2k → 12%OMAHA PERFORMING ARTS: $6k → 12%OMAHA PERFORMING ARTS: $6k → 12%WESTSIDE FOUNDATION: $6k → 12%OMAHA PERFORMING ARTS: $6k → 12%PLATTE INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC RESEARCH: $3k → 12%OMAHA PERFORMING ARTS: $6k → 12%OMAHA PERFORMING ARTS: $5k → 12%OMAHA PERFORMING ARTS: $5k → 12%NATURE CONSERVANCY: $5k → 12%OMAHA PERFORMING ARTS: $5k → 12%NATURE CONSERVANCY: $5k → 12%SHELTERING TREE: $35k → 12%LAURITZEN GARDENS: $18k → 12%SHELTERING TREE: $15k → 12%LAURITZEN GARDENS: $5k → 12%SHELTERING TREE: $5k → 12%SHELTERING TREE: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
OR
IA
NJ
CA
CO
NE
KY
VA
MD
AZ
KS
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$566k · 26 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
24

Total granted

$566k
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+17%

Still filing today

46%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationPublic BenefitArts & CultureSocial ScienceAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $64k · revenue +70%
  • ST
    SHELTERING TREE INC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $60k · revenue +132%
  • NF
    NORTHSTAR FOUNDATION
    2× · 2019–2025 · $10k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • AC
    AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -79%
  • VT
    VALLEY TIGER BOOSTER CLUB INC
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -5%
  • GS
    GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
2
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
3
National Taxpayers Union Foundation

National taxpayers union foundation (ntuf) provides crucial, impactful research and analysis showing americans how taxes, government spending, and regulations affect them. with our unique combination of policy expertise, outreach know-how,…

—
4
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
5
National Association of Corporate Directors

We empower directors and transform boards to be future ready.

Public Benefit
6
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
7
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
8
North Dakota State University Foundation

Building enduring relationships that maximize advocacy and philanthropy to support North Dakota State University.

Education
9
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
10
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
11
American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Iowa

The foundation works to defend and promote the constitution of the united states, focusing especially on the first, fourth, fifth, sixth, eighth, and 14th amendments. the foundation also works to defend and promote the constitution of the…

Civil Rights
12
Colorado Museum of Natural History

Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Valley Tiger Booster Club Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
23/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DUNDEE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $249,100 · OtherDUNDEE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHOMAHA PERFORMING ARTS: $39,000 · OtherOMAHA PERFORMING ARTSBOONE COUNTY AREA FOUNDATION: $32,000 · OtherBOONE COUNTY AREA FOUNDATIONMAYO CLINIC CANCER CENTER: $28,000 · OtherMAYO CLINIC CANCER CENTERLAURITZEN GARDENS: $27,600 · OtherLAURITZEN GARDENS+37 more: $83,590 · Other+37 moreUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $64,250 · EducationUNIVERSITY O…VALLEY TIGER BOOSTER CLUB INC: $10,000 · EducationVALLEY TIGER…+2 more: $700 · EducationSHELTERING TREE INC: $60,000 · Housing & ShelterSHELTERING…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $20,000 · HealthSTEADMAN PHILIPPON RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $2,000 · Health+4 more: $1,050 · HealthNEBRASKA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · PhilanthropyNORTHSTAR FOUNDATION: $10,250 · Youth DevelopmentTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $6,000 · Public BenefitJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $3,500 · Public Benefit
Other$459,290Education$74,950Housing & Shelter$60,000Health$23,050Philanthropy$20,000Youth Development$10,250Public Benefit$9,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $64,250 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSHELTERING TREE INC: $60,000 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetNEBRASKA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHSTAR FOUNDATION: $10,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVALLEY TIGER BOOSTER CLUB INC: $10,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetYoung America's Foundation: $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPLATTE INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC RESEARCH INC: $4,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEAGLE VALLEY LAND TRUST: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSTEADMAN PHILIPPON RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOMAHA COMMUNITY PLAYHOUSE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMITTEE FOR A CONSTRUCTIVE TOMORROW: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEBRASKA COALITION FOR LIFE SAVING CURES: $940 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL UNIVERSITY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIMMANUEL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetInstitute for Humane Studies: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOMWORKS FOUNDATION INC: $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetScottish Rite Foundation of Omaha: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOWN SYNDROME NETWORK OREGON: $200 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEBRASKA INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DURHAM MUSEUM: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJOSLYN ART MUSEUM: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SHELTERING TREE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds NORTHSTAR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY TIGER BOOSTER CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds Young America's Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PLATTE INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC RESEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds EAGLE VALLEY LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds STEADMAN PHILIPPON RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds OMAHA COMMUNITY PLAYHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds COMMITTEE FOR A CONSTRUCTIVE TOMORROW ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA COALITION FOR LIFE SAVING CURES ↗
  • Who funds FURRY FRIENDS REFUGE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds IMMANUEL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Lozier FoundationNE19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Lozier Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · The Fred and Sally Bekins Foundation · The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · Lincoln Community Foundation Inc · Amy L Scott Family Foundation · Dixon Family Foundation · Walter Scott Family Foundation · The Holland Foundation · Mammel Family Foundation · The Hawks Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Robert F & Myrna L Krohn Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Robert F & Myrna L Krohn Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Robert F & Myrna L Krohn Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph