Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Robert Black Foundation Trust dated September 212018

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$24k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$167kEmployment$1k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$28k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$10,000
New Music on the Point$3,000
Bang on a Can$3,000
Moab Music Festival$2,500
Millay Arts Foundation$2,500
Network for New Music$1,000
Estate of Phil Niblock$1,000
Cuatro Puntos$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 51% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 13%Mendelssohn Club of Philadelphia: $2k → 7%Mendelssohn Club of Philadelphia: $3k → 22%Millay Arts Foundation: $3k → 11%Evan Runyan: $1k → 11%Daniel Sabzghabaei: $1k → 14%Phil Niblock: $1k → 17%New Music Solidarity Fund: $3k → 20%International Society of Bassists: $4k → 14%Cuarto Puntos: $2k → 9%Kyle Grimm: $1k → 11%Moab Music Festival: $3k → 11%New Music on the Point: $6k → 12%Network for New Music: $1k → 22%Millay Arts: $3k → 11%Ian Fales: $1k → 20%International Society of Bassists: $4k → 14%Cuatro Puntos: $1k → 9%Kevin Huhn: $1k → 11%Moab Music Festival: $3k → 11%New Music on the Point: $4k → 12%Network for New Music: $1k → 22%Millay Arts Foundation: $3k → 11%Ensemble Ipse: $4k → 20%International Society of Bassists: $4k → 14%New Britain Museum of American Art: $30k → 11%Moab Music Festival: $3k → 11%New Music on the Point: $3k → 12%Network for New Music: $1k → 22%Millay Arts Foundation: $3k → 11%Cuatro Puntas: $1k → 11%Moab Music Festival: $2k → 11%New Music on Point: $3k → 12%Network for New Music: $1k → 22%Moab Music Festival: $1k → 11%New Music on the Point: $3k → 12%Network for New Music: $1k → 22%Doug Lemke: $1k → 11%Thomas Schuttenhelm: $10k → 22%Sue Huang: $1k → 20%Thomas Schuttenheim: $10k → 22%Estate of Phil Niblock: $1k → 20%Thomas Schuttenheim: $10k → 22%Bang on a Can: $3k → 20%Thomas Schuttenhelm: $5k → 22%Bang on a Can: $3k → 20%Bang on a Can: $2k → 20%Bang on a Can: $2k → 20%Bang on a Can: $2k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NY
PA
NJ
CT
UT
MD
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 18% of The Robert Black Foundation Trust dated September 212018’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 34% of the giving stays in CT; by stated purpose, 16%.

The Robert Black Foundation Trust dated September 212018lessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 21% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$113k · 13 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +76% since the first grant, against +40% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
17

Total granted

$113k
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%
+40%

Still filing today

62%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NM
    NEW MUSIC ON THE POINT INC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $16k · revenue +201%
  • IS
    INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF BASSISTS
    3× · 2020–2024 · $12k · revenue +219%
  • BO
    BANG ON A CAN
    5× · 2021–2025 · $11k · revenue +70%

Funded once

  • NB
    NEW BRITAIN MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $30k · revenue +40%
  • AM
    Association Megave Festival Savoy Truffle
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • NM
    New Music Solidarity Fund
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Foundation for Modern Opera
—
2
The New York New Music Ensemble Inc

To commission and perform new music

Arts & Culture
3
American Chamber Ensemble Inc

The American Chamber Ensemble is a consortium of distinguished musicians whose concerts explore the music for piano with strings, woodwinds and/or voice, presenting both great standard repertoire and living American composers.

—
4
League of Composers Inc

Engage audiences of new music

Arts & Culture
5
New Music Theatre Project Inc

New music theatre project is organized for the cultural purpose of developing new work that explores the traditional and innovative ways in which music and theatre play together. we focus on commissioning and co- producing new works of…

Arts & Culture
6
Cut Circle

The purpose of CUT CIRCLE is to bring late-medieval and Renaissance music to life. Reimagining early music as a site of gritty, intense experiences, Cut Circle's performances are distinguished by their energy and emotional sensitivity.…

Arts & Culture
7
Vanguard Concerts
—
8
Roger Shapiro Fund for New Music
Arts & Culture
9
BlackBox Ensemble Inc

To present and promote contemporary classical music through innovative, interdisciplinary performances; to support living composers; and to engage diverse audiences through education, collaboration, and community-based programming.…

Arts & Culture
10
Arion Chamber Music Inc

Present compelling chamber music performances.

Arts & Culture
11
Cantata Profana Inc

Cantata Profana, Inc. (www.cantataprofana.com) is a vocal and instrumental chamber ensemble that presents concerts of classical and chamber music ranging from the Baroque to modern eras with a unique narrative style. Our purpose is to…

Arts & Culture
12
The Musicians Aid Society of New York Inc
Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mendelssohn Club of Philadelphia; the most unlike its peers is Ensemble Ipse Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW BRITAIN MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART INC: $30,000 · Arts & CultureNEW BRITAIN MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART INCNEW MUSIC ON THE POINT INC: $15,500 · Arts & CultureNEW MUSIC ON THE POINT INCINTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF BASSISTS: $12,250 · Arts & CultureINTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF BASSISTSBANG ON A CAN: $11,000 · Arts & CultureBANG ON A CANMOAB MUSIC FESTIVAL INC: $10,500 · Arts & CultureMOAB MUSIC FESTIVAL INCENSEMBLE IPSE INC: $4,760 · Arts & CultureMENDELSSOHN CLUB OF PHILADELPHIA: $4,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $2,000 · Arts & CultureIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMillay Arts Foundation: $7,500 · OtherMillay Arts FoundationNETWORK FOR NEW MUSIC: $6,000 · OtherNETWORK FOR NEW MUSICAssociation Megave Festival Savoy Truffle: $5,100 · OtherAssociation Megave Festival Savoy TruffleNew Music on Point: $3,500 · Other+17 more: $20,904 · Other+17 more
Arts & Culture$90,010Other$78,004

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW BRITAIN MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNEW MUSIC ON THE POINT INC: $15,500 over 4y, 8.8% of budgetINTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF BASSISTS: $12,250 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetBANG ON A CAN: $11,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMOAB MUSIC FESTIVAL INC: $10,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetNETWORK FOR NEW MUSIC: $6,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetENSEMBLE IPSE INC: $4,760 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetMENDELSSOHN CLUB OF PHILADELPHIA: $4,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCUATRO PUNTOS INC: $2,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetGreater Hartford Arts Council Inc: $519 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW BRITAIN MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW MUSIC ON THE POINT INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF BASSISTS ↗
  • Who funds BANG ON A CAN ↗
  • Who funds MOAB MUSIC FESTIVAL INC ↗
  • Who funds NETWORK FOR NEW MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds ENSEMBLE IPSE INC ↗
  • Who funds MENDELSSOHN CLUB OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds CUATRO PUNTOS INC ↗
  • Who funds Greater Hartford Arts Council Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Amphion Foundation Inc Co Alter Kendrick & Baron LLPNY15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Amphion Foundation Inc Co Alter Kendrick & Baron LLP · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Robert Black Foundation Trust dated September 212018 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Robert Black Foundation Trust dated September 212018. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Greater Hartford Arts Council Inc: 24% of income from government
  • New Britain Museum of American Art Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Cuatro Puntos Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Robert Black Foundation Trust dated September 212018’s filings →

More from the funding graph