Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Robert and Rose Glick Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$174k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Religion$382kHealth$193kCivil Rights$122kInternational$120kHuman Services$103kPublic Safety & Disaster$101kPhilanthropy$70kEducation$65kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $97k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $77k
$6,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEMPLE BETH ISRAEL$25,000
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$14,500
SECURE COMMUNITY NETWORK$13,500
BREVARD ZOO$12,000
JAFINA$12,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY HOPE LODGE$6,000
TEMPLE BETH ISRAEL$6,000
SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGE OF FLORIDA$6,000
ALEX'S LEMONADE STAND$6,000
SANDY HOOK PROMISE$6,000
BOCA RATON REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$6,000
STAND WITH US$6,000
JEWISH FOR GOOD$6,000
COLLEGE AND CAREER ACCESS CENTER$6,000
HIAS$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HUSHABYE NURSERY: $5k → 11%HUSHABYE NURSERY: $5k → 11%NONPROFIT NETWORK: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of The Robert and Rose Glick Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Robert and Rose Glick Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 10% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 27 repeat orgs$176k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
19

Total granted

$1.0M
$140k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+15%

Still filing today

67%
68%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthArts & CultureReligionEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $117k · revenue +47%
  • SC
    SECURE COMMUNITY NETWORK INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $101k · revenue +454%
  • GS
    Gesher School Inc
    7× · 2018–2024 · $65k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • BR
    Boca Raton Regional Hospital Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +58%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF JACKSON COUNTY
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +11%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
2
Network of Jewish Human Service Agencies Inc

The network is an international membership association of more than 170 non profit human service agencies in the united states, canada and israel. its members provide a full range of human services for the jewish community and beyond,…

Human Services
3
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
4
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
5
The Shalom Hartman Institute of North America

The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…

International
6
Abraham Joshua Heschel Day School

Abraham joshua heschel day school cultivates students' natural sense of wonder into an exceptionally rich education that encourages critical thinking, creativity, and compassion. in partnership with our families, we inspire our students to…

—
7
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
8
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
9
Jewish Institute for National Security of America

The jewish institute for national security of america (jinsa) was founded in 1976 as a non-profit, non-partisan organization dedicated to advancing u.s. national security interests in the middle east, of which a critical pillar is a robust…

International
10
Jewish Electorate Institute

The jewish electorate institute (jei) is an independent, non-partisan 501(c)(3) organization that surveys, interprets, reports, and educates the public about the perspectives, voting behaviors, and motivations of the american jewish…

Civil Rights
11
The Jewish Women's Archive Inc

The jewish women's archive documents jewish women's stories, elevates their voices, and inspires them to be agents of change.jwa is dedicated to expanding and transforming the historical narrative by restoring jewish women and gender…

Arts & Culture
12
Avodah the Jewish Service Corps Inc

Avodah develops lifelong social justice leaders whose work is informed by jewish values and who inspire the jewish community to work toward a more just and equitable world.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Durham-Chapel Hill Jewish Federation; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/38
Grantees still filing
23/38
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEMPLE BETH ISRAEL: $260,688 · OtherTEMPLE BETH ISRAELSOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES FLORIDAINC: $41,000 · OtherSOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES FLORIDAINCALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION: $26,000 · OtherCONGREGATION B'NAI ISRAEL: $25,727 · OtherBoca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc: $36,000 · Other+31 more: $287,329 · Other+31 moreJEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL - NORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL: $47,000 · InternationalJEWISH AGEN…HIAS INC: $31,000 · InternationalHIAS INCFOREIGN POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $16,000 · InternationalFOREIGN POL…JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $15,000 · InternationalJEWISH NATI…HEART OF ADOPTIONS ALLIANCE INC: $10,000 · InternationalHEART OF AD…ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $6,000 · InternationalBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $5,000 · InternationalANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $117,400 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAM…SECURE COMMUNITY NETWORK INC: $101,300 · Public Safety & DisasterSECURE CO…Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $55,000 · HealthBoca Raton Regional Hospital Inc: $20,000 · HealthCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $15,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 · HealthGesher School Inc: $65,000 · EducationCOLLEGE AND CAREER ACCESS CENTER OF JACKSON: $16,000 · EducationTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $43,619 · PhilanthropyNEW ENGLAND HEMOPHILIA ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyLEV LALEV INC: $5,000 · Philanthropy
Other$676,744International$130,000Civil Rights$117,400Public Safety & Disaster$101,300Health$95,000Education$81,000Philanthropy$53,619

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $117,400 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSECURE COMMUNITY NETWORK INC: $101,300 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetGesher School Inc: $65,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $55,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL - NORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL: $47,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $43,619 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES FLORIDAINC: $41,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetBoca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc: $36,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHIAS INC: $31,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION: $26,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF ANN ARBOR: $21,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetGIVE KIDS THE WORLD INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBoca Raton Regional Hospital Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE AND CAREER ACCESS CENTER OF JACKSON: $16,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetFOREIGN POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $16,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF JACKSON COUNTY: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJackson School of the Arts Assoc: $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetDURHAM-CHAPEL HILL JEWISH FEDERATION: $11,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHUSHABYE NURSERY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHEART OF ADOPTIONS ALLIANCE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetSOUTH MICHIGAN FOOD BANK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREBOOT INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRISING HEROES INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNONPROFIT NETWORK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ENGLAND HEMOPHILIA ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHOLOCAUST DOCUMENTATION AND EDUCATION CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDR STANLEY AND PEARL GOODMAN JFS OF BROWARD COUNTY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEV LALEV INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetELLA SHARP MUSEUM ASSOCIATION OF JACKSON: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGROW JACKSON: $5,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds SECURE COMMUNITY NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds Gesher School Inc ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL - NORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES FLORIDAINC ↗
  • Who funds Boca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds HIAS INC ↗
  • Who funds ALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF ANN ARBOR ↗
  • Who funds GIVE KIDS THE WORLD INC ↗
  • Who funds Boca Raton Regional Hospital Inc ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE AND CAREER ACCESS CENTER OF JACKSON ↗
  • Who funds FOREIGN POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF JACKSON COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds Jackson School of the Arts Assoc ↗
  • Who funds DURHAM-CHAPEL HILL JEWISH FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds HUSHABYE NURSERY ↗
  • Who funds HEART OF ADOPTIONS ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH MICHIGAN FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds REBOOT INC ↗
  • Who funds RISING HEROES INC ↗
  • Who funds SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Alvin L Glick FoundationMI19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Alvin L Glick Foundation · Lavery Foundation · Jackson Community Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · Louis Glick Memorial & Charitable Trust · John George Jr Paragraph X Trust · WK Kellogg Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Robert and Rose Glick Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Robert and Rose Glick Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Robert and Rose Glick Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Robert and Rose Glick Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Robert and Rose Glick’s filings →

More from the funding graph