Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Robert and Angela Ortenzio Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$375k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$4.8MReligion$1.0MEducation$524kHuman Services$257kYouth Development$60kArts & Culture$50kScience & Tech$16kFood & Nutrition$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $500
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $349k
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$5.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WHITAKER CENTER$150,000
BISHOP MCDEVITT HIGH SCHOOL$99,305
THE LINK 4 YOUTH$50,000
THEATRE HARRISBURG$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME$25,000
TRINITY HIGH SCHOOL$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $107k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FRIENDS OF LANTERN HILL: $20k → 11%FRIENDS OF LANTERN HILL: $20k → 11%FRIENDS OF LANTERN HILL: $10k → 11%KEYSTONE FAMILY ALLIANCE: $50k → 16%FRIENDS OF LANTERN HILL: $2k → 11%HARRISBURG POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE: $3k → 12%HARRISBURG POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE: $2k → 12%HARRISBURG POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 15 repeat orgs$445k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
13

Total granted

$1.7M
$96k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+3%

Still filing today

53%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $350k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureReligionPhilanthropyInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EC
    ELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGE
    4× · 2019–2022 · $100k · revenue +2%
  • FO
    Friends of Lantern Hill Inc
    4× · 2019–2024 · $52k · revenue +35%
  • GC
    GETTYSBURG COLLEGE
    2× · 2018–2019 · $25k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • PO
    PENNSYLVANIA ORPHAN CARE ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • RM
    Rene Moawad Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +72%
  • VO
    VETERANS OUTREACH OF PENNSYLVANIA
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -20%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Desales University

Desales is a catholic, salesian university that inspires transformative learning through the liberal arts and professional studies by energizing students to be who they are and be that well.

Education
2
Shady Side Academy

Shady side academy offers an exceptional pre-k through twelfth grade academic and balanced educational experience by challenging each student to realize his or her potential in a stimulating and nurturing environment.

Education
3
Alvernia University

Alvernia university is a catholic comprehensive university with a liberal arts foundation founded by the bernardine franciscan sisters in 1958. see continuation on schedule o.

—
4
Chatham University

Chatham university prepares women and men to be world ready: to build lives of purpose and value and fulfilling work. (see continuation on schedule o)in addition to appropriate professional skills and liberal arts learning, chatham…

Education
5
University of Saint Joseph

The university provides a rigorous liberal arts and professional education for a diverse student population. (see schedule o for the organization's mission.)

Education
6
Portersville Christian School

The mission of portersville christian school is to glorify god by preparing students to serve christ and instilling high standards spiritually, academically, socially, and physically. the school provides a high-quality academic program, a…

Education
7
Collegium Institute

Collegium Institute is a Catholic intellectual apostolate that fosters the Catholic intellectual tradition within the University of Pennsylvania community and within the greater region and secular academia. (Continued on Sch. O)

—
8
Youthbuild Dc Public Charter School Inc

Youthbuild pcs seeks to transform the lives of disconnected youth by offering a program, in english and spanish, that combines rigorous academic instruction with vocational training, life and employability skills- building, and community…

Education
9
The Academy of the New Church

The mission of the academy is to study and teach the truths of the natural and spiritual worlds in the light of the old testament, the new testament, and the writings of emanuel swedenborg. this is done at the academy of the new church…

Education
10
Belmont Alliance Civic Association

Community development resources

Youth Development
11
St Barnabas Center for Ministry

To nurture the spiritual, educational and social development of children and youth in uptown harrisburg, pennsylvania.

—
12
Masters School

The masters school celebrates active participation, deep understanding, and meaningful connection. a community of diverse individuals, we gather to learn, to strive, to dare, to do - to be a power for good in the world.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Nativity School of Harrisburg; the most unlike its peers is Paradisus Dei Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Notre Dame du Lac: $4,725,000 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac+4 more: $245,000 · EducationCATHEDRAL PARISH OF SAINT PATRICK: $1,000,000 · OtherCATHEDRAL PARISH OF SAINT PA…Individual grant recipient: $187,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWHITAKER CENTER: $150,000 · OtherWHITAKER CENTERPENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $125,000 · OtherPENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSIT…BISHOP MCDEVITT HIGH SCHOOL: $99,305 · OtherBISHOP MCDEVITT HIGH SCHOOLUNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME BANGLADESH: $75,000 · Other+15 more: $117,500 · Other+15 moreFriends of Lantern Hill Inc: $51,500 · Human ServicesPENNSYLVANIA ORPHAN CARE ALLIANCE: $50,000 · Human ServicesHARRISBURG POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE: $5,500 · Human ServicesHARRISBURG COMMUNITY THEATRE THEATRE HARRISBURG: $50,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $500 · Arts & CultureCENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK: $14,000 · Food & NutritionRene Moawad Foundation: $10,000 · InternationalVETERANS OUTREACH OF PENNSYLVANIA: $10,000 · Public Benefit
Education$4,970,000Other$1,754,305Human Services$107,000Arts & Culture$50,500Food & Nutrition$14,000International$10,000Public Benefit$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $4,725,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATIVITY SCHOOL OF HARRISBURG: $100,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGE: $100,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Lantern Hill Inc: $51,500 over 4y, 19% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA ORPHAN CARE ALLIANCE: $50,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetGETTYSBURG COLLEGE: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WILDCAT FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetCENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK: $14,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVETERANS OUTREACH OF PENNSYLVANIA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHARRISBURG POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE: $5,500 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetMEDARDS HOUSE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBOB CRAIG YOUTH FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetHOMELAND CENTER: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASA Charter School Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds THE NATIVITY SCHOOL OF HARRISBURG ↗
  • Who funds ELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Friends of Lantern Hill Inc ↗
  • Who funds PENNSYLVANIA ORPHAN CARE ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds HARRISBURG COMMUNITY THEATRE THEATRE HARRISBURG ↗
  • Who funds GETTYSBURG COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE WILDCAT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Rene Moawad Foundation ↗
  • Who funds VETERANS OUTREACH OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds PARADISUS DEI INC ↗
  • Who funds HARRISBURG POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds MEDARDS HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds BOB CRAIG YOUTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOMELAND CENTER ↗
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN CAMP HILL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds CASA Charter School Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of the Capital RegionPA22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of the Capital Region · The Foundation for Enhancing Communities · Joseph T and Helen M Simpson Foundation · Hall Foundation · Alexander and Jane Boyd Ta Foundation · Upmc Pinnacle Hospitals · McCormick Family Fdn Agent 80397 · Kenneth Bankert Foundation Inc · The Donald B and Dorothy L Stabler Foundation · Central Pennsylvania Food Bank · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Charities Aid Foundation America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Robert and Angela Ortenzio Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Robert and Angela Ortenzio Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Robert and Angela Ortenzio Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Robert and Angela Ortenzio Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robert and Angela Ortenzio Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph