Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Rns Faithful Servant Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$62k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$52kEducation$51kArts & Culture$34kReligion$25kHealth$8kHuman Services$1k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $53k
$22,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$73k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GOLISANO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF NAPLES$30,700
NAPLES CHILDREN AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC$22,500
AMBER'S ANTIBODIES$8,062
YOUTH HAVEN INC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%YOUTH HAVEN INC: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$132k · 3 repeat orgs$39k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
3

Total granted

$132k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+131%
+166%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’24
PhilanthropyEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2017–2024 · $52k · revenue +84%
  • TV
    THE VILLAGE SCHOOL OF NAPLES INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $46k · revenue +166%
  • GC
    GOLISANO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF NAPLES INC
    2× · 2017–2024 · $34k · revenue +131%

Funded once

  • NN
    NORTH NAPLES UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • DP
    DANNY PARMERTOR MEMORIAL FUND INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +166%
  • TW
    TED WILLIAMS MUSEUM AND HITTERS HALL OF FAME INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $320 · revenue +78%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
2
The Nathanson-Abrams Family Foundation
—
3
Womble Institute for Neurodiversity Inc

To empower our learners to become happy, successful adults through specialized instruction and loving guidance. working as a team with each learner's family, we systematically build essential skills that lead to immediate and long term…

Education
4
Van Andel Research Institute

Medical research organization van andel research institute is an independent biomedical research organization committed to improving the health and enhancing the lives of current and future generations.

Health
5
Naples Zoo Inc

Naples zoo is accredited by the american zoo & aquarium association (aza) and has numerous animal exhibits placed on its 45-acre site. (continued on schedule o)each exhibit is unique and designed to simulate typical conditions for the…

Animals
6
American Board of Medical Specialties

In collaboration with its member boards, abms creates standards for board certification for physicians and medical specialists. specifically, for initial and continuing certification. abms and its member boards establish rigorous standards…

—
7
The Graduate School of the Stowers Institute for Medical Research

The graduate school of the stowers institute for medical research ("gssimr") exempt purpose is to provide graduate education that will prepare scholars for scientific research in the biological sciences.

Education
8
The Naples Players Inc

To build community through exceptional access to the power of theatre, providing a cultural hub that leads a shift in the national perception of how theatres can impact their communities.

Arts & Culture
9
Institute for Protein Innovation Inc

The institute for protein innovation is advancing protein science to accelerate research and improve human health.

Health
10
The American Board of Internal Medicine

See schedule o.the american board of internal medicine (abim) seeks to enhance the quality of health care by certifying internists and subspecialists who demonstrate the knowledge, skills and attitudes essential for excellent patient care.

Health
11
The Oaks School

In an atmosphere of mutual respect and responsibility, the oaks school prepares students to meet the world with the combined wisdom of an intelligent mind, a skilled hand, and a compassionate heart.

Education
12
University of Miami
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Naples Children Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ambers Antibodies Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $52,000 · PhilanthropyNAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INCAMBERS ANTIBODIES INC: $8,062 · PhilanthropyAMBERS ANTIBODIES INCTHE VILLAGE SCHOOL OF NAPLES INC: $45,915 · EducationTHE VILLAGE SCHOOL OF NAPLES INCDANNY PARMERTOR MEMORIAL FUND INC: $5,000 · EducationDANNY PARMERTOR MEMORIAL FUND INCGOLISANO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF NAPLES INC: $33,900 · Arts & CultureGOLISANO CHILDREN'S MU…+1 more: $320 · Arts & CultureNORTH NAPLES UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $25,000 · OtherNORTH NAPLES UNI…YOUTH HAVEN INC: $1,000 · Human Services
Philanthropy$60,062Education$50,915Arts & Culture$34,220Other$25,000Human Services$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $52,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE VILLAGE SCHOOL OF NAPLES INC: $45,915 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetGOLISANO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF NAPLES INC: $33,900 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAMBERS ANTIBODIES INC: $8,062 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetYOUTH HAVEN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTED WILLIAMS MUSEUM AND HITTERS HALL OF FAME INC: $320 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Rns Faithful Servant Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Rns Faithful Servant Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Youth Haven Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rns Faithful Servant’s filings →

More from the funding graph