How much did The Rivera Krall Family Foundation grant in FY2024?

Human Services$71kCommunity Improvement$37kHousing & Shelter$33kEducation$16kHealth$11kCrime & Legal$8kEnvironment$1kPhilanthropy$1kArts & Culture$550Other$45k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

—

2019

—

2020

hardship

2021

—

2022

hardship

2023

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k14 grants · $28k
$10k–50k1 grant · $10k

$2,000

Median grant

States reached

$704k

Total assets

Largest grants

BEVERLY BOOTSTRAPS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC$10,000
YMCA OF THE NORTH SHORE INC$5,000
AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS$5,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC$4,000
STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$2,500
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC$2,500
FAMILY PROMISE NORTH SHORE BOSTON INC$2,000
HARBORLIGHT COMMUNITY PARTNERS$2,000
SAINT FRANCIS HOUSE INC$1,500
MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL$1,000
BEVERLY ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION INC$1,000
H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE$500
ST JOHNS PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC$500
GLEN URQUHART SCHOOL INC$250
SENIORCARE INC$86

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 10%. 11% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$205k · 22 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$205k

$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%

+225%

Still filing today

73%

20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthEducationHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

YMCA OF THE NORTH SHORE INC
8× · 2017–2024 · $50k · revenue +59%
BEVERLY BOOTSTRAPS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
8× · 2017–2024 · $37k · revenue +62%
HF
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC
7× · 2018–2024 · $31k · revenue +13%

Funded once

VB
VILLAGE BY VILLAGE INC
one grant, 2020 · $2k
MD
M Danjou
one grant, 2020 · $1k
MG
MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL-THE SCHWARTZ CENTER
one grant, 2020 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Harvard Street Neighborhood Health

Provide world-class clinical care in a safe & compassionate patient-centered healing environment.

Health

South Shore Habitat for Humanity Inc

Together we build strength, stability and self-reliance through shelter by partnering with families in need of affordable housing.

Housing & Shelter

Boston Health Care for the Homeless

The mission of the boston health care for the homeless program (bhchp) is to ensure unconditionally equitable and dignified access to the highest quality health care for all individuals and families experiencing homlessness in our…

Human Services

Brighton Marine Inc

To ensure quality health care is delivered to uniformed service beneficiaries.

Health

Boston Harbor Now Inc

Our mission is to ensure that the people of greater boston benefit from a vibrant, resilient, and inclusive waterfront, harbor, and islands; these spaces are equitable, accessible, and adapted to climate change; and to ensure our public,…

Environment

Neighborhealth Corporation

Neighborhealth's mission is to promote and sustain healthy communities, families, and individuals by providing accessible, person-centered, and compassionate, high-quality health care services to all who live and work in our service area,…

Health

Massachusetts Housing and Shelter

Provide social work, social services, education & public service functions.

Human Services

Fisher House of Boston Inc

To provide lodging for the families of veterans being treated at massachusetts hospitals

Health

Berkshire Health Systems Inc

To advance health & wellness of our community in a welcoming,inclusive,& personalized environment.

Health

East End House Inc

Provide childcare and community action programs to the local population.

Human Services

The Mercy Hospital Inc

To provide health care and hospital services

Health

Horizons for Homeless Children

To improve the lives of homeless children and their families.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saint Francis House Inc and the most unlike its peers is Children's Hospital Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/24

the rest of the field

12%

2,134/17,676

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

23 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

22/23

Grantees still filing

21/23

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Human Services$71,441Other$47,189Community Improvement$36,500Housing & Shelter$33,000Education$16,000Health$10,500Crime & Legal$8,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Essex County Community Foundation IncMA28.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Essex County Community Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Salem Five Charitable Foundation Inc · People's United Community Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Ge Foundation · Brace Cove Foundation Inc · Institution for Savings in Newburyport & · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Arbella Insurance Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation The Rivera Krall Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

7get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: BEVERLY ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~7 months of operating runway; revenue held over 6 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 270051015 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on BEVERLY ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 7 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue held over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 1% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Rivera Krall Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Rivera Krall Family Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

The Rivera Krall Family Foundation

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

23 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Rivera Krall Family Foundation?

More from the funding graph

The Rivera Krall Family Foundation

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

23 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Rivera Krall Family Foundation?

More from the funding graph