Skip to content

· Public charity

The Right Rider Access Fund Inc

To promote the safe and responsible use of off-highway vehicles and to preserve their access to appropriate lands.

$450k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$350k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$2.9MEnvironment$393kCommunity Improvement$35kPublic Safety & Disaster$24kHealth$8k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $439,280, the rows itemized in this filing. The $449,780 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $10,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $81k
  • $250k+1 grant · $350k
$25,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$194k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL OFF-HIGHWAY VEHICLE CONSERVATION COUNCIL (NOHVCC)$350,000
TREADLIGHTLY$26,280
QUIET WARRIOR RACING$25,000
SOUTHERN TRAIL ADVOCATES AND RIDERS$20,000
KEWEENAW ATV CLUB$10,000
POST WILDFIRE OHV RECOVERY ALLIANCE$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%TREADLIGHTLY: $25k → 11%NATIONAL OFF-HIGHWAY VEHICLE CONSERVATION COUNCIL (NOHVCC): $350k → 14%POST WILDFIRE OHV RECOVERY ALLIANCE: $8k → 8%QUIET WARRIOR RACING: $25k → 9%QUIET WARRIOR RACING: $25k → 10%STEWARDS OF SEQUOIA: $15k → 18%TEXAS TRAILS: $14k → 12%SOUTHERN TRAIL ADVOCATES AND RIDERS: $20k → 9%KEWEENAW ATV CLUB: $10k → 14%WILD RIVERS COAST MOUNTAIN BIKE ASSOCIATION: $8k → 14%COALMONT OHV PARK LLC: $10k → 21%TREADLIGHTLY: $26k → 6%RIDE WITH RESPECT: $8k → 11%WILLIAMS COUNTY PARKS DEPARTMENT: $10k → 8%RENO AREA DIRT RIDERS: $20k → 7%NATIONAL OFF-HIGHWAY VEHICLE CONSERVATION COUNCIL (NOHVCC): $470k → 14%QUIET WARRIOR RACING: $25k → 9%QUIET WARRIOR RACING: $25k → 10%OFF-ROAD BUSINESS ASSOCIATION INC: $35k → 18%TEXAS TRAILS EDUCATION & MOTORIZED MANAGEMENT: $10k → 12%KEWEENAW ATV CLUB: $8k → 14%TREADLIGHTLY: $25k → 6%NATIONAL OFF-HIGHWAY VEHICLE CONSERVATION COUNCIL (NOHVCC): $450k → 14%QUIET WARRIOR RACING: $25k → 9%QUIET WARRIOR RACING: $25k → 10%OFF ROAD BUSINESS ASSOCIATION: $20k → 18%KEWEENAW ATV CLUB: $8k → 14%TREADLIGHTLY: $20k → 6%NATIONAL OFF-HIGHWAY VEHICLE CONSERVATION COUNCIL (NOHVCC): $450k → 14%QUIET WARRIOR RACING: $25k → 9%CALIFORNIA OUTDOOR RECREATION FOUNDATION: $12k → 10%TREAD LIGHTLY INC: $20k → 6%NATIONAL OFF-HIGHWAY VEHICLE CONSERVATION COUNCIL (NOHVCC): $363k → 14%QUIET WARRIOR RACING: $25k → 9%TREAD LIGHTLY INC: $20k → 6%NATIONAL OFF-HIGHWAY VEHICLE CONSERVATION COUNCIL (NOHVCC): $360k → 14%TREADLIGHTLY: $10k → 6%NATIONAL OFF-HIGHWAY VEHICLE CONSERVATION COUNCIL (NOHVCC): $360k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
ND
MI
OR
NV
CA
UT
TN
SC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.2M · 6 repeat orgs$136k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
8

Total granted

$3.2M
$108k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
0%

Still filing today

67%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Recreation & SportsEnvironmentPublic Safety & DisasterHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NO
    NATIONAL OFF-HIGHWAY VEHICLE CONSERVATION COUNCIL INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $2.8M · revenue -35% · 67% of their budget
  • QW
    QUIET WARRIOR RACING
    7× · 2017–2024 · $175k
  • TL
    TREAD LIGHTLY INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $146k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • QW
    QUIET WARRIOR RACING
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • RA
    RENO AREA DIRT RIDERS
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • SO
    STEWARDS OF THE SEQUOIA
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue -42%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Overland Mountain Bike Association

Promote and support skills and safety for mountain biking in and around the front range of northern Colorado and southern Wyoming. This includes trail upkeep and expansion and safe biking education.

Recreation & Sports
2
Washington Off-Highway Vehicle Alliance

Protect, Maintain and Promote Off Highway Vehicle Activities

Recreation & Sports
3
Iron Range Trail Club Inc

Snowmobile trail grooming and maintenance.

Environment
4
Ogemaw Hills Snowmobile Club

To promote & encourage protection of wildlife/wilderness - grooming trails

—
5
Truckee Dirt Union

Creating positive outcomes for mountain biking

Environment
6
Alpine Trails Foundation

Trail maintenance

—
7
Gunnison Trails Inc

Gunnison Trails is a non-profit trail advocacy organization established to assist land managers and other organizations in maintaining existing trails, educating users on responsible trail-based recreation, and pursuing opportunities for…

Environment
8
Pulaski Users Group Inc

Trail Maintenance on Public Lands

Environment
9
Ohio Motorized Trails Association

Promote the development and maintenance of trails throughout the state of Ohio for a variety of user groups. To Pursue, promote and protect the interest of trail users.

Environment
10
Coconino Trail Riders

The coconino trail riders (ctr) is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization committed to preserving the sport of motorized single-track trail riding. ctr advocates for off-road motorcycle recreation opportunities and works closely with land…

Recreation & Sports
11
Hawes Trail Alliance co Tom Stapley

The organization was formed to help maintain, enhance and expand the Hawes Trail System to be enjoyed by bikers, hikers, and all outdoor enthusiasts.

Recreation & Sports
12
Volt Volunteers of Lewis River Trails

preserve ohv riding on public lands - THIS NON PROFIT HAS BEEN CLOSED/DISSOLVED AS O FFEBRUARY 2020

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ride With Respect Nonprofit Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Coalmont Ohv Park Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL OFF-HIGHWAY VEHICLE CONSERVATION COUNCIL INC: $2,802,500 · Recreation & SportsNATIONAL OFF-HIGHWAY VEHICLE CONSERVATION COUNCIL INCTREAD LIGHTLY INC: $146,280 · Recreation & Sports+2 more: $17,800 · Recreation & SportsQUIET WARRIOR RACING: $175,000 · OtherQUIET WARR…OFF-ROAD BUSINESS ASSOCIATION: $55,000 · OtherOFF-ROAD B…QUIET WARRIOR RACING: $25,000 · OtherQUIET WARR…RENO AREA DIRT RIDERS: $20,000 · OtherRENO AREA …SOUTHERN TRAIL ADVOCATES AND RIDERS: $20,000 · OtherSOUTHERN T…CALIFORNIA OUTDOOR RECREATION FOUNDATION: $12,000 · Other+1 more: $10,000 · OtherKEWEENAW ATV CLUB INC: $25,000 · Public Safety & DisasterTEXAS TRAILS EDUCATION AND MOTORIZED MANANGEMENT: $23,500 · Public Safety & DisasterSTEWARDS OF THE SEQUOIA: $15,000 · EnvironmentPOST WILDFIRE OHV RECOVERY ALLIANCE: $8,000 · EnvironmentRIDE WITH RESPECT NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $7,999 · Health
Recreation & Sports$2,966,580Other$317,000Public Safety & Disaster$48,500Environment$23,000Health$7,999

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL OFF-HIGHWAY VEHICLE CONSERVATION COUNCIL INC: $2,802,500 over 7y, 67% of budgetTREAD LIGHTLY INC: $146,280 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetKEWEENAW ATV CLUB INC: $25,000 over 3y, 7.0% of budgetTEXAS TRAILS EDUCATION AND MOTORIZED MANANGEMENT: $23,500 over 2y, 24% of budgetSTEWARDS OF THE SEQUOIA: $15,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetPOST WILDFIRE OHV RECOVERY ALLIANCE: $8,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetRIDE WITH RESPECT NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $7,999 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetWild Coast Trails Association: $7,800 over 1y, 2.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL OFF-HIGHWAY VEHICLE CONSERVATION COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds TREAD LIGHTLY INC ↗
  • Who funds KEWEENAW ATV CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS TRAILS EDUCATION AND MOTORIZED MANANGEMENT ↗
  • Who funds STEWARDS OF THE SEQUOIA ↗
  • Who funds Coalmont OHV Park Inc ↗
  • Who funds POST WILDFIRE OHV RECOVERY ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds RIDE WITH RESPECT NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Wild Coast Trails Association ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE5.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Right Rider Access Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Right Rider Access Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Right Rider Access’ filings →

    More from the funding graph