Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Richardson Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$432k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$105k
Largest
01What it funds
0172% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Civil Rights$526kHuman Services$462kReligion$422kRecreation & Sports$245kArts & Culture$207kPhilanthropy$136kYouth Development$122kInternational$17kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $54k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $157k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $221k
$12,500
Median grant
10
States reached
$4.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$104,900
FOCUS ON THE FAMILY$58,500
ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM$57,900
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES$35,800
FATHER'S IN THE FIELD$29,600
Individual grant recipient$27,400
TRANS WORLD RADIO$23,000
YOUNGLIFE$15,100
HEART TO HEART PRC OF LARAMIE$13,800
Individual grant recipient$12,500
OAKS INTERNATIONAL$9,000
Individual grant recipient$7,200
LIFECHOICE PCC OF CHEYENNE$6,800
NEW HORIZONS$6,300
INTER-VARSITY$5,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SCARLET HOPE: $4k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
WI
MI
MA
NV
WY
CO
KY
AZ
NC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.3M · 31 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
2

Total granted

$3.3M
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+21%

Still filing today

13%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionCivil RightsYouth DevelopmentInternationalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM
    9× · 2017–2025 · $526k · revenue +134%
  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $122k · revenue +59%
  • IC
    InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA
    6× · 2017–2022 · $27k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • E
    ESPRIT
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • SI
    Scriptures In Use
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
3
Crossing Cultures International Inc

Crossing Cultures International, Inc. exists to glorify God by equipping Christ followers globally with comprehensive training for effective ministry.

Religion
4
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
5
Next Worldwide Inc

With a desire to see the Gospel proclaimed in all nations, we exist to make and multiply disciples of the next generation through the vehicles of church-planting missions and missional leadership training.

—
6
Biglife International Inc

Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.

Recreation & Sports
7
Global Outreach International Inc

To get the good news to every nation this generation by showing and sharing god's love by providing opportunities and supporting christian missionaries in over fifty seven countries around the world.

International
8
International Commission Inc

Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.

Religion
9
Global Media Outreach

Leveraging technology to invite all people to know jesus christ as savior and grow in a personal relationship with him.

Religion
10
Adventive Cross Cultural Initiatives

ACCI serves pioneering Christians, empowering them to proclaim the gospel, fulfill their God-given visions, and advance the kingdom of God. ACCI longs for a world where lives are transformed through the Holy Spirit, where new disciples are…

Religion
11
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
12
Convention of Full Gospel Churches

The Convention of Full Gospel Churches exists to be a Holy Spirit-empowered, Christ-centered fellowship of churches, faithfully proclaiming the Word of God, ministering in the power of the Holy Spirit, equipping the saints for service, and…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alliance Defending Freedom; the most unlike its peers is Great Oaks International Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $457,550 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $321,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $227,900 · OtherFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETESFOCUS ON THE FAMILY: $221,100 · OtherFOCUS ON THE FAMILYFATHER'S IN THE FIELD: $211,300 · OtherFATHER'S IN THE FIELDFOCUS ON FAMILY: $139,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $136,250 · OtherTHE NAVIGATORS: $131,450 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $130,800 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $103,600 · Other+19 more: $570,100 · Other+19 moreALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $526,000 · Civil RightsALLIANCE DEFENDIN…The New Horizons Foundation Inc: $135,600 · PhilanthropyYOUNG LIFE: $121,700 · Youth DevelopmentInterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA: $27,200 · ReligionCOMMON GROUND CONSULTANTS INC: $27,000 · ReligionGREAT OAKS INTERNATIONAL INC: $9,000 · InternationalSCARLET HOPE INC: $3,900 · Human Services
Other$2,650,450Civil Rights$526,000Philanthropy$135,600Youth Development$121,700Religion$54,200International$9,000Human Services$3,900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $526,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetThe New Horizons Foundation Inc: $135,600 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $121,700 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP OF WYOMING INC: $39,900 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetInterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA: $27,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMON GROUND CONSULTANTS INC: $27,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetSCARLET HOPE INC: $3,900 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetScriptures In Use: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM ↗
  • Who funds The New Horizons Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds CHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP OF WYOMING INC ↗
  • Who funds InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA ↗
  • Who funds COMMON GROUND CONSULTANTS INC ↗
  • Who funds GREAT OAKS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SCARLET HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds Scriptures In Use ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA10.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Richardson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Richardson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Richardson Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Richardson Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Richardson Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph