· Private foundation
The Reb Ephraim Chaim and Miriam Rochel Klein Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 5 grants below total $1,120,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,141,930 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,021,430 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $2k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $139k
- $250k+1 grant · $980k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Friends of Mosdot Gur | $980,000 |
| World Hope Inc. | $139,000 |
| Cong. Ahavas Tzedaka V'Chesed | $1,000 |
| Cong. Zvi Lezadik Bluzev | $250 |
| Bais Yaakov D'Chassidei Gur | $250 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
6 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FOFRIENDS OF MOSDOT GUR4× · 2021–2024 · $4.6M
- WHWORLD HOPE INC2× · 2023–2024 · $253k · revenue 0% · 86% of their budget
- BYBeis Yaakov Dechasidei Gur2× · 2021–2022 · $81k
Funded once
- TTTalmud Torah Emrei Emesone grant, 2023 · $500k
- MVMORASHA VADAAT MENUCHAT OLAMIM INCone grant, 2022 · $195k · revenue -87%
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF TIFERET MOSHE BETZALEL INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +46%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Friends of Mosdot Goor · Birchas Mordechai Charitable Foundation · Chaim Maleh Foundation · The Ojc Fund · Eastlawn Foundation · The Fishoff Family Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Reb Ephraim Chaim and Miriam Rochel Klein Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Reb Ephraim Chaim and Miriam Rochel Klein Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.