Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Reb Ephraim Chaim and Miriam Rochel Klein Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$980k
Largest
01What you fund
0174% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$6.4MPhilanthropy$168kHuman Services$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 5 grants below total $1,120,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,141,930 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,021,430 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $2k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $139k
  • $250k+1 grant · $980k
$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$49M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Friends of Mosdot Gur$980,000
World Hope Inc.$139,000
Cong. Ahavas Tzedaka V'Chesed$1,000
Cong. Zvi Lezadik Bluzev$250
Bais Yaakov D'Chassidei Gur$250
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.0M · 6 repeat orgs$906k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
8

Total granted

$5.0M
$905k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+46%

Still filing today

33%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
ReligionHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF MOSDOT GUR
    4× · 2021–2024 · $4.6M
  • WH
    WORLD HOPE INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $253k · revenue 0% · 86% of their budget
  • BY
    Beis Yaakov Dechasidei Gur
    2× · 2021–2022 · $81k

Funded once

  • TT
    Talmud Torah Emrei Emes
    one grant, 2023 · $500k
  • MV
    MORASHA VADAAT MENUCHAT OLAMIM INC
    one grant, 2022 · $195k · revenue -87%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TIFERET MOSHE BETZALEL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +46%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Your field
03the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
2/6
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FRIENDS OF MOSDOT GUR — $4,627,500 · OtherFRIENDS OF MOSDOT GURTalmud Torah Emrei Emes — $500,000 · OtherTalmud Torah Emrei Emes+10 more — $258,980 · OtherGLOBAL CENTER OF GUR INC — $500,000 · ReligionGLOBAL CENTER OF …WORLD HOPE INC — $252,500 · ReligionWORLD HOPE INCMORASHA VADAAT MENUCHAT OLAMIM INC — $195,000 · ReligionMORASHA VADAAT ME…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TIFERET MOSHE BETZALEL INC — $100,000 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS …FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $168,000 · Community ImprovementTEHILLAT NAAVA SHLACH LACHMECHA FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 · Human Services
Other$5,386,480Religion$1,047,500Community Improvement$168,000Human Services$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGLOBAL CENTER OF GUR INC — $500,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetWORLD HOPE INC — $252,500 over 2y, 86% of budgetMORASHA VADAAT MENUCHAT OLAMIM INC — $195,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $168,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF TIFERET MOSHE BETZALEL INC — $100,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetTEHILLAT NAAVA SHLACH LACHMECHA FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GLOBAL CENTER OF GUR INC
  • Who funds WORLD HOPE INC
  • Who funds MORASHA VADAAT MENUCHAT OLAMIM INC
  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TIFERET MOSHE BETZALEL INC
  • Who funds TEHILLAT NAAVA SHLACH LACHMECHA FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Friends of Mosdot GoorNY17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Friends of Mosdot Goor · Birchas Mordechai Charitable Foundation · Chaim Maleh Foundation · The Ojc Fund · Eastlawn Foundation · The Fishoff Family Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Reb Ephraim Chaim and Miriam Rochel Klein Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Reb Ephraim Chaim and Miriam Rochel Klein Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph