· Private foundation
The Rav-Noy Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k45 grants · $37k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $112k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $78k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $78,020 |
| FCLA | $27,000 |
| CHABAD OF OXNARD | $24,770 |
| CHABAD PERSIAN YOUTH | $20,000 |
| CHABAD OF CAMARILLO | $15,460 |
| EZRAT ISRAEL | $14,800 |
| CHEDER LUBAVITCH | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $7,600 |
| CHABAD OF RAMAT HASHARON | $6,000 |
| STAND WITH US | $2,000 |
| CHABAD AT CALTECH | $2,000 |
| CHABAD OF CONEJO | $1,890 |
| MOBILE MITZVAH CENTER | $1,800 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ERETZ HEMDAH | $1,090 |
| CHABAD FRIENDS OF CUBAN JEWRY | $1,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +74% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.
158 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2025, 131 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $118k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- FCFRIENDSHIP CIRCLE7× · 2017–2023 · $296k · revenue +118%
- HOHILLEL OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC4× · 2017–2020 · $5k · revenue +244%
- MOMESIVTA OF GREATER LOS ANGELES6× · 2017–2022 · $4k · revenue +51%
Funded once
- WCWest Coast Vaad Hachesedone grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue -16%
- MMAYANOTone grant, 2023 · $9k
- CJCHABAD J CENTER OF THOUSAND OAKSone grant, 2017 · $9k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.
Religious Teaching
How this is measured
57 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 57 of the 305 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Goldner Family Foundation Inc · Rebbe's Partnership Foundation · Nash Charity Foundation Inc · The Ojc Fund · The Setton Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish Federation Council of Greater La · Jay Morris Foundation Inc · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · Hager Foundation · Chabad on Campus International Inc
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization The Rav-Noy Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Rav-Noy Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
- The Aleph Institute Inc: 0% of income from government
How this is measured
Play a game based on Rav-Noy Family’s filings →