Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Ralph and Marlene Ross Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$171k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Public Safety & Disaster$241kHealth$152kHousing & Shelter$85kEducation$55kFood & Nutrition$30kArts & Culture$20kReligion$10kYouth Development$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $110k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEVADA BLIND CHILDRENS FDN$50,000
NEVADA BLIND CHILDRENS FDN$20,000
IPOF$20,000
PROF FIRE FIGHTERS OF NV$20,000
NEVADA BLIND CHILDRENS FDN$20,000
CEF ORANGE COAST CHAPTER$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
ISAIAH HOUSE$10,000
NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SVCS OF SO NV$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
ONE TRIBE INC$2,500
CHILDRENS MIRACLE NETWORK$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $130k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $10k → 14%NEVADA BLIND CHILDRENS FDN: $50k → 13%NEVADA BLIND CHILDRENS FDN: $20k → 13%NEVADA BLIND CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $20k → 13%NEVADA BLIND CHILDRENS FDN: $20k → 13%NEVADA BLIND CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$387k · 10 repeat orgs$213k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +83% since the first grant, against +67% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
10

Total granted

$387k
$143k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+83%
+67%

Still filing today

50%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $70k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’25
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NB
    NEVADA BLIND CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION
    3× · 2020–2025 · $120k · revenue +167%
  • HO
    HOPELINK OF SOUTHERN NEVADA
    2× · 2020–2021 · $30k · revenue +315%
  • IP
    INJURED POLICE OFFICERS FUND
    2× · 2020–2021 · $20k · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • E2
    EIN 20-4388246
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • E9
    EIN 94-3202139
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • E8
    EIN 83-1973282
    one grant, 2021 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nevada Childhood Cancer Foundation

To provide social, emotional, educational, and psychological support and programs to families of all children diagnosed with life threatening or critical illnesses and provide healing arts and wellness programs to adults touched by cancer…

Health
2
Children's Tumor Foundation

Our mission: drive research, expand knowledge, and advance care for the nf community. our vision: end nf.

Health
3
Chance for Hope Foundation

The mission of the chance for hope foundation is to provide support services for children with cancer and their families, funding for pediatric cancer research and treatment, and educational resources to the general public regarding…

Unclassified
4
Northern Nevada Children's Cancer Foundation

The foundation's mission is to enhance the quality of life for children with cancer and their families by providing financial assistance and compassionate support programs while advocating for increased research funds and raising public…

Philanthropy
5
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
6
Children's Cancer Fund of New Mexico

The children's cancer fund of new mexico exists to help persons from new mexico who have been diagnosed with and treated for childhood cancer (at a new mexico pediatric oncology facility) and their families cope with the day-to-day…

7
City of Hope National Medical Center

City of Hope National Medical Center's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
8
Chance for Life

Chance for life's mission is to raise awareness and funds for critical research and clinical trials for pediatric cancer in the united states of america.

Health
9
Chmc Community Health Services Network

Chmc community health services network ("chsn") is organized and operated exclusively to support cincinnati children's hospital medical center ("cchmc") in cchmc's efforts to provide medical services to all of the children in the community.

Health
10
Childhood Cancer Foundation Inc

This organization is committed to ensuring no one has to face the diagnosis of childhood cancer alone and pledges to provide financial assistance to families of children with cancer during the most difficult time of their lives.

Health
11
Northern Nevada Hiv Outpatient Program Education and Services

Northern Nevada Hopes provides affordable, high-quality, medical, behavioral health, and support services for all. We are dedicated to building a healthier community by providing coordinated care and support for individuals and family…

Health
12
Miracles for Kids Inc

Miracles for kids helps families with critically-ill children battle bankruptcy, homelessness, hunger and depression so they concentrate on what is most important - fighting for their child's life.

Recreation & Sports

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Miracle Network and the most unlike its peers is ChemoCars Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

EIN XXX-XX-XXXX — $75,000 · OtherEIN XXX-XX-XXXXEIN 88-0197393 — $60,000 · OtherEIN 88-0197393EIN 20-4388246 — $20,000 · OtherEIN 20-4388246BUGLES ACROSS AMERICA — $20,000 · OtherBUGLES ACROSS AMERICAEIN 94-3202139 — $20,000 · OtherEIN 94-3202139IPOF — $20,000 · OtherIPOFEIN 83-1973282 — $20,000 · OtherEIN 83-1973282EIN 35-1044585 — $20,000 · OtherEIN 35-1044585PROF FIRE FIGHTERS OF NV — $20,000 · OtherPROF FIRE FIGHTERS OF NVEIN 20-0113126 — $20,000 · OtherEIN 20-0113126EIN 20-3642862 — $18,000 · Other+9 more — $57,000 · Other+9 moreNEVADA BLIND CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $120,000 · Human ServicesNEVADA BLIND CHILDREN'S …UNION RESCUE MISSION — $10,000 · Human ServicesUNION RESCUE MISSIONHOPELINK OF SOUTHERN NEVADA — $30,000 · Housing & ShelterISAIAH HOUSE INC — $30,000 · PhilanthropyINJURED POLICE OFFICERS FUND — $20,000 · Crime & LegalST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $10,000 · HealthChemoCars Inc — $10,000 · Health
Other$370,000Human Services$130,000Housing & Shelter$30,000Philanthropy$30,000Crime & Legal$20,000Health$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNEVADA BLIND CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $120,000 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetHOPELINK OF SOUTHERN NEVADA — $30,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetISAIAH HOUSE INC — $30,000 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetINJURED POLICE OFFICERS FUND — $20,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNION RESCUE MISSION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChemoCars Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEVADA BLIND CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HOPELINK OF SOUTHERN NEVADA
  • Who funds ISAIAH HOUSE INC
  • Who funds INJURED POLICE OFFICERS FUND
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds UNION RESCUE MISSION
  • Who funds ChemoCars Inc
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Enterprise Holdings FoundationMO12.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Ralph and Marlene Ross Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Ralph and Marlene Ross Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Ralph and Marlene Ross Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph