Skip to content

· Public charity

The Rainforest Fund Inc

To protect & support indigenous peoples & traditional populations of the rainforest in their efforts to protect their environment & defend their rights, to promote sustainable development of their communities, & to challenge government practices which have a damaging effect on their environment.the organization (org") carries out its…

$1.2M
Granted FY2017
1
Grants FY2017
1
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2017 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $7,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,175,834 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,168,834 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$7,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STANDING ROCK SIOUX TRIBE$7,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–17) land where the poverty rate runs at 33%, against an area that typically sits at 40%. 0% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 40%STANDING ROCK SIOUX TRIBE: $7k → 33%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $799k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 10 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Indonesia$221k · 28% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: TERRITORIAL SECURITY AND ACCESS TO JUSTICE FOR THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF DAYAK BAHAR IN MAHAKAM ULU - LONG LSUN. THEY AIM TO UPHOLD SOCIAL JUSTICE AND PROTECT THE HUMAN RIGHTS OF THE DAYAK PEOPLE, OFFERING ASSISTANCE THROUGH REGULAR DISCUSSIONS WITH THE LONG LSUN COMMUNITY. ADDITIONALLY, THE DEFENDING CUSTOMARY LANDS OF THE DAYAK BEKATI IN THE WEST PROJECT AIMS TO SECURE EFFECTIVE RECOGNITION AND PROTECTION OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES' RIGHTS TO THEIR LAND AND FORESTS AND TO REBUILD SUSTAINABLE LIVELIHOODS. · ECONUSA IS WORKING IN PAPUA TO EMPOWER LOCAL COMMUNITIES WHILE PROTECTING THE ENVIRONMENT. THE PROJECT FOCUSES ON INCREASING MANGROVE FOREST PROTECTION AND SUPPORTING SUSTAINABLE LIVELIHOODS. COMMUNITIES WILL BE ASSISTED IN PRODUCING NON-TIMBER FOREST PRODUCTS, SUCH AS PRAWNS, AND GAINING BETTER MARKET ACCESS.

Brazil$197k · 25% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: AIMS TO ESTABLISH A MEDICINAL PLANT RESOURCE THAT WILL BENEFIT ALL INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES IN THE LOWER XINGU REGION. THIS INITIATIVE SEEKS TO PRESERVE AND STRENGTHEN INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE OF MEDICINAL PLANTS, ENSURING IT IS PASSED ON TO THE YOUNGER GENERATION AND DOESN'T REMAIN LIMITED TO A FEW ELDERS. ADDITIONALLY, FOCUSES ON STRENGTHENING INDIGENOUS AND QUILOMBOLACOMMUNITIES RESPONSE TO ADVANCE OF DEFORESTATION AND RECOGNITION OF TRADITIONAL LAND RIGHTS. FINALLY, A THIRD PROJECT COLLABORATES CLOSELY WITH INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES IN THE AMAZON REGION TO MONITOR AND REPORT ON ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES AND RELATED CRIMES.

Sub-Saharan Africa$85k · 11% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: THE PURPOSE OF THIS PROJECT IS TO WORK WITH FOREST COMMUNITIES TO IMPLEMENT KEY ACTIONS IDENTIFIED IN THEIR MANAGEMENT PLANS, PARTICULARLY SUSTAINABLE LIVELIHOODS. AS THE PREVIOUS YEAR, THE PROJECT CONTINUES TO ENGAGE WITH INDIGENOUS PEOPLES BAKA AND BANTU AND SUPPORT SELF-LED FOREST MANAGEMENT, AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION, AND INCREASING ACCESS TO MARKETS AND FINANCE.

Panama$80k · 10% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: THIS PROJECT AIMS TO SECURE LAND RIGHTS AND IMPROVE TERRITORIAL GOVERNANCE FOR FOREST PROTECTION IN PANAMA. LOCAL PARTNERS WILL BE SUPPORTED IN DEFENDING 2.8 MILLION HECTARES OF LAND TITLES AND MANAGING 6.9 MILLION HECTARES MORE. THE INITIATIVE ALSO INTEGRATES TECHNOLOGY FOR FOREST MONITORING AND PROVIDES TRAINING TO STRENGTHEN GOVERNANCE.

Kenya$55k · 7% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: THE PURPOSE OF THIS PROJECT IS TO SECURE CHEPKITATE OGIEK COMMUNITY ANCESTRAL LANDS, INGENIOUS FORESTS, TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE AND LIVELIHOODS. (CIPDP CHEPKITALE INDIGENOUS PEOPLE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT).

Costa Rica$50k · 6% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: THE BRIBRI INDIGENOUS PEOPLE OF THE SALITRE FOREST CONTINUE THEIR WORK TO EXPEL NON-INDIGENOUS PEOPLES FROM THEIR LAND AND STRENGTHEN THEIR GOVERNMENT STRUCTURES. IN 2021, THEY CONTINUED TO DEVELOP KNOWLEDGE FOR THE YOUTH, AND PROTECTION OF THEIR LAND FROM CONTINUED INVASION.

The Republic Of Congo$50k · 6% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: THIS PROJECT AIMS TO PROMOTE RIGHTS-BASED APPROACHES IN DEVELOPMENT ANDCONSERVATION. IT BUILDS UPON THE PREVIOUS YEAR'S WORK WITH 16 COMMUNITIES IN THE MESSOK DJA REGION, CONTINUING EFFORTS TO EMPOWER THESE COMMUNITIES BY PROVIDING THEM WITH THE NECESSARY STRENGTH AND KNOWLEDGE REGARDING THEIR RIGHTS.

Democratic Republic Of Congo$25k · 3% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: ALLIANCE NATIONALE D'APPUI ET DE PROMOTION DES AIRES DU PATRIMOINE AUTOCHTONETHE PURPOSE OF THIS PROJECT IS TO SUPPORT THE PYGMY INDIGENOUS PEOPLES IN THEIR QUEST FOR THE RESPECT OF THEIR RIGHTS AND THEIR LAND.

Philippines$24k · 3% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: THIS PROJECT SECURES LAND RIGHTS AND LIVELIHOODS FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES IN THE PHILIPPINES. EFFORTS INCLUDE OBTAINING CADT CERTIFICATES, IMPLEMENTING COMMUNITY-DRIVEN PLANS, AND OFFERING LEGAL SUPPORT AGAINST CORPORATE LAND CONFLICTS. IT ALSO ADDRESSES BASIC NEEDS THROUGH AGRICULTURE, AQUACULTURE, AND HEALTHCARE PROGRAMS UNDER THE "SECURE AND "SOS HEALTH" INITIATIVES.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its field
03the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2017.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2017, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 1 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Rainforest Fund Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Rainforest Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $799k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2017, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rainforest’s filings →

More from the funding graph