Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Rainforest Fund Inc

To protect & support indigenous peoples & traditional populations of the rainforest in their efforts to protect their environment & defend their rights, to promote sustainable development of their communities, & to challenge government practices which have a damaging effect on their environment.the organization (org") carries out its…

$1.2M
Granted FY2017
1
Grants FY2017
1
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2017 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 1 grants below total $7,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,175,834 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,168,834 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$7,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STANDING ROCK SIOUX TRIBE$7,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–17) land where the poverty rate runs at 33%, against an area that typically sits at 40%. 0% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 40%STANDING ROCK SIOUX TRIBE: $7k → 33%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Grants abroad, by region — $799k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 10 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Indonesia$221k · 28% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: TERRITORIAL SECURITY AND ACCESS TO JUSTICE FOR THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF DAYAK BAHAR IN MAHAKAM ULU - LONG LSUN. THEY AIM TO UPHOLD SOCIAL JUSTICE AND PROTECT THE HUMAN RIGHTS OF THE DAYAK PEOPLE, OFFERING ASSISTANCE THROUGH REGULAR DISCUSSIONS WITH THE LONG LSUN COMMUNITY. ADDITIONALLY, THE DEFENDING CUSTOMARY LANDS OF THE DAYAK BEKATI IN THE WEST PROJECT AIMS TO SECURE EFFECTIVE RECOGNITION AND PROTECTION OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES' RIGHTS TO THEIR LAND AND FORESTS AND TO REBUILD SUSTAINABLE LIVELIHOODS. · ECONUSA IS WORKING IN PAPUA TO EMPOWER LOCAL COMMUNITIES WHILE PROTECTING THE ENVIRONMENT. THE PROJECT FOCUSES ON INCREASING MANGROVE FOREST PROTECTION AND SUPPORTING SUSTAINABLE LIVELIHOODS. COMMUNITIES WILL BE ASSISTED IN PRODUCING NON-TIMBER FOREST PRODUCTS, SUCH AS PRAWNS, AND GAINING BETTER MARKET ACCESS.

Brazil$197k · 25% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: AIMS TO ESTABLISH A MEDICINAL PLANT RESOURCE THAT WILL BENEFIT ALL INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES IN THE LOWER XINGU REGION. THIS INITIATIVE SEEKS TO PRESERVE AND STRENGTHEN INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE OF MEDICINAL PLANTS, ENSURING IT IS PASSED ON TO THE YOUNGER GENERATION AND DOESN'T REMAIN LIMITED TO A FEW ELDERS. ADDITIONALLY, FOCUSES ON STRENGTHENING INDIGENOUS AND QUILOMBOLACOMMUNITIES RESPONSE TO ADVANCE OF DEFORESTATION AND RECOGNITION OF TRADITIONAL LAND RIGHTS. FINALLY, A THIRD PROJECT COLLABORATES CLOSELY WITH INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES IN THE AMAZON REGION TO MONITOR AND REPORT ON ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES AND RELATED CRIMES.

Sub-Saharan Africa$85k · 11% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: THE PURPOSE OF THIS PROJECT IS TO WORK WITH FOREST COMMUNITIES TO IMPLEMENT KEY ACTIONS IDENTIFIED IN THEIR MANAGEMENT PLANS, PARTICULARLY SUSTAINABLE LIVELIHOODS. AS THE PREVIOUS YEAR, THE PROJECT CONTINUES TO ENGAGE WITH INDIGENOUS PEOPLES BAKA AND BANTU AND SUPPORT SELF-LED FOREST MANAGEMENT, AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION, AND INCREASING ACCESS TO MARKETS AND FINANCE.

Panama$80k · 10% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: THIS PROJECT AIMS TO SECURE LAND RIGHTS AND IMPROVE TERRITORIAL GOVERNANCE FOR FOREST PROTECTION IN PANAMA. LOCAL PARTNERS WILL BE SUPPORTED IN DEFENDING 2.8 MILLION HECTARES OF LAND TITLES AND MANAGING 6.9 MILLION HECTARES MORE. THE INITIATIVE ALSO INTEGRATES TECHNOLOGY FOR FOREST MONITORING AND PROVIDES TRAINING TO STRENGTHEN GOVERNANCE.

Kenya$55k · 7% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: THE PURPOSE OF THIS PROJECT IS TO SECURE CHEPKITATE OGIEK COMMUNITY ANCESTRAL LANDS, INGENIOUS FORESTS, TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE AND LIVELIHOODS. (CIPDP CHEPKITALE INDIGENOUS PEOPLE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT).

Costa Rica$50k · 6% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: THE BRIBRI INDIGENOUS PEOPLE OF THE SALITRE FOREST CONTINUE THEIR WORK TO EXPEL NON-INDIGENOUS PEOPLES FROM THEIR LAND AND STRENGTHEN THEIR GOVERNMENT STRUCTURES. IN 2021, THEY CONTINUED TO DEVELOP KNOWLEDGE FOR THE YOUTH, AND PROTECTION OF THEIR LAND FROM CONTINUED INVASION.

The Republic Of Congo$50k · 6% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: THIS PROJECT AIMS TO PROMOTE RIGHTS-BASED APPROACHES IN DEVELOPMENT ANDCONSERVATION. IT BUILDS UPON THE PREVIOUS YEAR'S WORK WITH 16 COMMUNITIES IN THE MESSOK DJA REGION, CONTINUING EFFORTS TO EMPOWER THESE COMMUNITIES BY PROVIDING THEM WITH THE NECESSARY STRENGTH AND KNOWLEDGE REGARDING THEIR RIGHTS.

Democratic Republic Of Congo$25k · 3% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: ALLIANCE NATIONALE D'APPUI ET DE PROMOTION DES AIRES DU PATRIMOINE AUTOCHTONETHE PURPOSE OF THIS PROJECT IS TO SUPPORT THE PYGMY INDIGENOUS PEOPLES IN THEIR QUEST FOR THE RESPECT OF THEIR RIGHTS AND THEIR LAND.

Philippines$24k · 3% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: THIS PROJECT SECURES LAND RIGHTS AND LIVELIHOODS FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES IN THE PHILIPPINES. EFFORTS INCLUDE OBTAINING CADT CERTIFICATES, IMPLEMENTING COMMUNITY-DRIVEN PLANS, AND OFFERING LEGAL SUPPORT AGAINST CORPORATE LAND CONFLICTS. IT ALSO ADDRESSES BASIC NEEDS THROUGH AGRICULTURE, AQUACULTURE, AND HEALTHCARE PROGRAMS UNDER THE "SECURE AND "SOS HEALTH" INITIATIVES.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your field
03the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2017.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172017, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 1 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Rainforest Fund Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Rainforest Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 1 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $799k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2017, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph