Skip to content

· Private foundation

The R & S Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$238k
Granted FY2024still arriving
114
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0160% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$945kEducation$52kPhilanthropy$43kHuman Services$39kYouth Development$31kInternational$30kCivil Rights$9kArts & Culture$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 114 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k105 grants · $89k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $148k
$301
Median grant
4
States reached
$238k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KOLLEL CHAZON ISH$30,000
AFO RAMOT TORAH SCHOOLS$25,000
YESHIVA GEDOLAH OF PATERSON$25,000
Individual grant recipient$14,585
OTHER MISCELLANEOUS 501(C)(3) CHARITIES$12,140
Individual grant recipient$11,500
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
CONG BAIS HALEVY$10,000
TALMUD TORAH OF LAKEWOOD$9,219
AMERICAN YEDIDIM$8,000
KNESSES YEHUDA$8,000
Individual grant recipient$4,960
NER GAVRIEL FUND$4,250
KEREN HATZEDAKA$3,438
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GMACH OF JACKSON: $250 → 11%CHAIM MEDICAL RESOURCES: $36 → 14%KEREN HATZEDAKA: $3k → 11%KEREN HATZEDAKA: $2k → 11%CHASDEI NACHUM: $250 → 11%MISHKAN YITZCHOK: $250 → 11%MISHKAN YITZCHOK: $200 → 11%MISASKIM: $3k → 20%CHAI 4 EVER: $25 → 11%TIKVAH LEDOROS: $360 → 20%BONEI OLAMN: $250 → 20%BONEI OLAMN: $100 → 20%BONEI OLAMN: $100 → 20%MISASKIM: $100 → 20%BOBBIES PLACE: $100 → 20%WE LOVE TO HELP: $36 → 20%KEREN ANIYIM: $25 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 193 repeat orgs$192k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +6% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

193 repeat relationships: 88 still active in FY2024, 105 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

193
354

Total granted

$1.6M
$180k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+3%

Still filing today

10%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KC
    KOLLEL CHAZON ISH
    4× · 2019–2024 · $134k · revenue +47%
  • LC
    LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $32k · revenue +26%
  • NG
    NER GAVRIEL FUND INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $18k · revenue ×12

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • YM
    YESHIVA MESIVTA CHAIM BERLIN
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • PI
    PENIMI INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
2
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
3
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
4
Mishken Chaim Rivnits

Assistance to the indigent

Religion
5
Gemilas Chesed Kramer Inc
Philanthropy
6
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
7
Chabad Lametayel Inc

encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.

—
8
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
9
Rashbi Tehillim Incorporated
Religion
10
Keren Avraham Shmuel Inc Wachman
Philanthropy
11
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
12
Kollel Nefesh Hachaim Inc
Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chasdei Yisroel Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mjb Chesed Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 575 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
51/51
Grantees still filing
28/51
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KOLLEL CHAZON ISH: $134,000 · OtherKOLLEL CHAZON ISHIndividual grant recipient: $101,575 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $99,542 · OtherIndividual grant recipientYESHIVA GEDOLAH OF PATERSON INC: $87,500 · OtherYESHIVA GEDOLAH OF PATERSON INCIndividual grant recipient: $63,000 · OtherTALMUD TORAH OF LAKEWOOD: $61,134 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $56,000 · OtherYESHIVA GEDOLAH OF PATERSON: $52,650 · OtherAFO RAMOT TORAH SCHOOLS: $50,000 · Other+172 more: $764,459 · Other+172 moreAmerican Friends of Ramot Torah Schools: $104,025 · EducationAmerican F…LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC: $31,700 · EducationLAKEWOOD C…BMG STUDENT AID FUND: $10,000 · EducationBMG STUDEN…PENIMI INC: $10,000 · EducationPENIMI INC+1 more: $750 · EducationNER GAVRIEL FUND INC: $17,860 · ReligionZICHRON ELIYAHU INC: $13,460 · ReligionLEV BEREL INC: $8,300 · ReligionMAALOT: $5,400 · ReligionYESHIVA OHR YITZCHOK: $4,600 · ReligionKEREN HASHVIIS INC: $2,200 · Religion+1 more: $1,250 · ReligionAmerican Yedidim Inc: $30,500 · InternationalKEREN HATZEDAKA INC: $5,275 · Human ServicesMISASKIM CORP: $2,600 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAGDIL TORAH INC: $7,500 · Arts & CultureMJB CHESED FUND INC: $4,000 · PhilanthropyCHASDEI YISROEL INC: $560 · PhilanthropyCHAI LIFELINE INC: $1,980 · Health
Other$1,469,860Education$156,475Religion$53,070International$30,500Human Services$7,875Arts & Culture$7,500Philanthropy$4,560Health$1,980

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKOLLEL CHAZON ISH: $134,000 over 4y, 5.7% of budgetAmerican Friends of Ramot Torah Schools: $104,025 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC: $31,700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Yedidim Inc: $30,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetNER GAVRIEL FUND INC: $17,860 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetZICHRON ELIYAHU INC: $13,460 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBMG STUDENT AID FUND: $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetPENIMI INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetLEV BEREL INC: $8,300 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAGDIL TORAH INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMAALOT: $5,400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKEREN HATZEDAKA INC: $5,275 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA OHR YITZCHOK: $4,600 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMISASKIM CORP: $2,600 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetKEREN HASHVIIS INC: $2,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $1,980 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTECHAYEINU: $1,250 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetKOLLEL HALACHA VHORAAH INC: $750 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCHASDEI YISROEL INC: $560 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KOLLEL CHAZON ISH ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of Ramot Torah Schools ↗
  • Who funds LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds American Yedidim Inc ↗
  • Who funds NER GAVRIEL FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds ZICHRON ELIYAHU INC ↗
  • Who funds BMG STUDENT AID FUND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jack Adjmi Family Foundation IncNY84× affinity51 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · The Ojc Fund · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · The Basch Family Foundation · Zichron Btz Tzedakah Foundation · The Fishoff Family Foundation · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · The Setton Foundation · Regina Goldwasser Foundation · The Sorala Foundation · The Adjmi-Dwek Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The R & S Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The R & S Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 140%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Cheder Toras Zev: 22% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Nachlei Torah Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Chai 4EVER Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
14get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 575 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on R & S Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph