Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Puterbaugh Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$4.4MHealth$565kHuman Services$438kYouth Development$360kArts & Culture$355kPublic Benefit$131kHousing & Shelter$89kCrime & Legal$29kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $136k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $544k
  • $250k+1 grant · $500k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Southeast Oklahoma Public Library S$500,000
McAlester Public Schools$200,952
Shared Blessings$95,000
Individual grant recipient$75,168
McAlester Regional Health Center$72,994
Boys and Girls Club of McAlester$50,000
Oklahoma Medical Resrch Foundation$50,000
Oklahoma Heritage Museum$26,200
Okla State University Foundation$25,000
University of Oklahoma Foundation$25,000
Friends of The McAlester Pub Libr$20,000
Eastern Oklahoma State College$20,000
McAlester Chamber of Commerce$10,175
Oklahoma Arts Institute Quartz Moun$10,000
Okla Education TV Authority$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%Youth Emergency Shelter: $10k → 17%Youth Emergency Shelter: $10k → 17%Youth Emergency Shelter: $10k → 17%Youth Emergency Shelter: $5k → 17%Youth Emergency Shelter: $5k → 17%Youth Emergency Shelter: $5k → 17%Youth Emergency Shelter: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.4M · 30 repeat orgs$315k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
17

Total granted

$6.4M
$315k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+90%

Still filing today

27%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthPublic BenefitArts & CultureEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SB
    SHARED BLESSINGS INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $385k · revenue +19%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MCALESTER
    7× · 2019–2025 · $360k · revenue +24%
  • YE
    YOUTH EMERGENCY SHELTER INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $50k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • HH
    Hope House
    one grant, 2020 · $89k
  • OM
    Oklahoma Medial Research Foundation
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • Oklahoma Medical Research Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +42%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oklahoma Newspaper Foundation
Arts & Culture
2
Oklahoma State Chamber of Commerce and Industry Inc

The State Chamber is a statewide membership organization. Our purpose is to be the unified voice of business and the most effective advocacy organization at the State Capitol.

—
3
Oklahoma Policy Inc

Oklahoma policy advances equitable and fiscally responsible policies that expand opportunity for all oklahomans through nonpartisan research, analysis, and advocacy.

Civil Rights
4
Oklahoma Hall of Fame

The oklahoma hall of fame preserves oklahomas unique history while promoting pride in our great state through each of its programs and the gaylord-pickens museum. the association honors our states rich tradition by telling oklahomas story…

Arts & Culture
5
Oklahoma City Beautiful Inc

OKC Beautiful's mission is to lead beautification and environmental stewardship through collaboration, education and advocacy. We have been doing this for over 50 years through volunteers and contributing donors. This directly impacts the…

Environment
6
Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs Inc

To promote the flourishing of the people of oklahoma by advancing principles and policies that support free enterprise, limited government, personal responsibility, and individual initiative.

Public Safety & Disaster
7
Oklahoma Scholarship Fund Inc
—
8
Oklahoma Decides Inc

Education and issue advocacy related to helping Oklahomans understand their Constitutional right to decide issues for themselves at the ballot box.

—
9
Tulsa Advocates for the Protection of Children

To improve the lives of children and youth in oklahoma's child welfare system by providing resources and building community.

Crime & Legal
10
Oklahoma Health Sciences Facility

To enhance and promote the educational mission and delivery of healthcare of the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center through the acquisition improvement and development of various and sundry facilities and performing of any an…

Education
11
Oklahoma State Medical Association

Osma's vision is to be the leading voice in health care for oklahoma's patients, families and physicians. osma's mission is better health for oklahoma.

—
12
Eastern Oklahoma State College Development Foundation Inc

The Foundation's primary purpose is to provide resources and to seek external support for scholarships, faculty development, equipment, and campus projects, which support Eastern Oklahoma State College, a community college in Southeast…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oklahoma State University Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Youth Emergency Shelter Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

McAlester Public Schools: $1,865,888 · OtherMcAlester Public SchoolsSoutheast Oklahoma Public Library S: $1,700,000 · OtherSoutheast Oklahoma Public Library SEastern Oklahoma State College: $421,147 · OtherEastern Oklahoma State CollegeBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MCALESTER: $360,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MCALESTEROklahoma Medical Resrch Foundation: $300,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $245,504 · OtherOklahoma Heritage Museum: $203,900 · Other+31 more: $935,094 · Other+31 moreSHARED BLESSINGS INC: $385,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH EMERGENCY SHELTER INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $185,000 · EducationOklahoma State University Foundation: $25,000 · EducationOklahoma Medical Research Foundation: $50,000 · HealthHOSPICE OF MCALESTER INC: $2,000 · HealthLEADERSHIP OKLAHOMA INC: $10,000 · Public BenefitOKLAHOMA WATCH INC: $4,000 · Arts & CulturePRIDE IN MCALESTER INC: $2,000 · Environment
Other$6,031,533Human Services$435,000Education$210,000Health$52,000Public Benefit$10,000Arts & Culture$4,000Environment$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHARED BLESSINGS INC: $385,000 over 7y, 6.7% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MCALESTER: $360,000 over 7y, 25% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $185,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH EMERGENCY SHELTER INC: $50,000 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetOklahoma Medical Research Foundation: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOklahoma State University Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEADERSHIP OKLAHOMA INC: $10,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetOKLAHOMA WATCH INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHOSPICE OF MCALESTER INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHARED BLESSINGS INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MCALESTER ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH EMERGENCY SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Oklahoma State University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds LEADERSHIP OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF MCALESTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The McGowan Family FoundationOK17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The McGowan Family Foundation · The Fugitt Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Puterbaugh Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Puterbaugh Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 31%
  • Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation: 31% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Puterbaugh Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Puterbaugh Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Puterbaugh’s filings →

More from the funding graph