· Private foundation
The Prevot Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k21 grants · $47k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $95k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BURKE MOUNTAIN ACADEMY | $30,000 |
| HARDWICK AREA FOOD PANTRY INC | $20,000 |
| CENTER FOR AN AGRICULTURAL ECONOMY | $15,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| RURAL ARTS COLLABORATIVE INC (FKA WONDER ARTS AND WONDER & WISDOM) | $10,000 |
| AWARE | $10,000 |
| CRAFTSBURY SAPLINGS | $5,000 |
| NEW ENGLAND NORDIC SKI ASSOCIATION | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| APEX FOR YOUTH | $5,000 |
| WILLIAMS COLLEGE | $3,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,000 |
| STRIDE - THE WRIGHT FOUNDATION FOR FEMALE ATHLETES | $3,000 |
| NORTHWOODS STEWARTSHIP CENTER | $2,000 |
| BURKE MOUNTAIN ACADEMY | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.
30 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BMBURKE MOUNTAIN ACADEMY INC8× · 2017–2024 · $158k · revenue +93%
- HAHARDWICK AREA FOOD PANTRY INC8× · 2017–2024 · $130k · revenue +71%
- CFCENTER FOR AN AGRICULTURAL ECONOMY INC8× · 2017–2024 · $92k · revenue +619%
Funded once
- CDCOOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +37%
- NKNEK KIDS ON THE MOVE PROGRAM OF NEKYSone grant, 2017 · $3k
Appalachian Mountain Clubone grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue +23%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Fostering, encouraging and assisting the physical location of business enterprises within the States of Vermont and New Hampshire, and having its principal purpose be industrial and economic development of one or more political…
Mt. Ascutney Outdoors, Inc's mission is to promote vitality within the community by providing affordable and unique recreational, cultural and educational activities to local residents and visitors from the Upper Valley region of Vermont…
Protect land along rivers, lakes and wetlands of vt; protect public access, wildlife habitat, scenic natural beauty, and ecological integrity.
The mission of cooperation vermont is to build thriving community economic and enviromental democracy.
The Northern Forest Center creates bold possibilities that give rise to vibrant Northern Forest communities and envisions a thriving and welcoming Northern Forest region sustained by innovation and environmental stewardship.
Hampshire country school is a place of possibilities for high-ability, neurodiverse students enrolling in later elementary or middle school who have not found success in traditional educational environments. hampshire country school offers…
To protect and preserve the Wentworth-Crescent Watershed through initiatives that enhance water quality, land conservation and community education.
Vermont public informs, educates, and entertains through public service journalism and enlightening content rooted in vermont. our storytelling enriches lives and fosters community connection and understanding.
To maintain cross country ski trails for the town of wolfeboro for the benefit of the citizenry and to promote local tourism interests and, thereby, to stimulate job creation.
Catamount Institute is dedicated to connecting kids to the outdoors through environmental education and outdoor adventures.
Advancing science and stewardship of adirondack waters.
NOFA-NH actively promotes organic, regenerative, ecologically sound farming, gardening, eating, and land care practices for healthy communities. NOFA-NH helps people build local, just, and sustainable food systems.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwoods Stewardship Center and the most unlike its peers is Concrete Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BURKE MOUNTAIN ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds HARDWICK AREA FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR AN AGRICULTURAL ECONOMY INC ↗
- Who funds AWARE Inc ↗
- Who funds RURAL ARTS COLLABORATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds CRAFTSBURY PUBLIC LIBRARY INC ↗
- Who funds Williams College ↗
- Who funds Moriah Wilson Foundation ↗
- Who funds NEW ENGLAND NORDIC SKI ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds Vermont Public Radio ↗
- Who funds APEX FOR YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds CONCRETE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Salvation Farms Inc ↗
- Who funds NOBLE AND GREENOUGH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds CRAFTSBURY COMMUNITY CARE CENTER ↗
- Who funds CRAFTSBURY SAPLINGS INC ↗
- Who funds GREENSBORO COMMUNITY TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHWOODS STEWARDSHIP CENTER ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC ↗
- Who funds Appalachian Mountain Club ↗
- Who funds CRAFTSBURY ACADEMY CORPORATION CO UNION BANK ↗
- Who funds NORDIC SKI CLUB OF FAIRBANKS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Vermont Community Foundation · The Wisdom Connection Inc · Norman J Fisher and Doris Fisher Foundation · The Stony Point Foundation · The Allen Hilles Fund · Lintilhac Foundation Inc · National Life Group Charitable Foundation Inc · Agnes M Lindsay Trust · Ben & Jerry's Foundation Inc · New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Impactassetsinc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Prevot Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Cooperative Development Institute Inc — 58% of income from government
- Aware Inc — 58% of income from government
- Northwoods Stewardship Center — 40% of income from government
- Craftsbury Saplings Inc — 40% of income from government
- Salvation Farms Inc — 26% of income from government
- Center for an Agricultural Economy Inc — 12% of income from government
- Appalachian Mountain Club — 1% of income from government
- Craftsbury Community Care Center — 1% of income from government
- Craftsbury Public Library Inc — 0% of income from government
- Williams College — 0% of income from government
- Concrete Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.