Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Poole Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$135k
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$53k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.1MHealth$175kArts & Culture$64kRecreation & Sports$46kPhilanthropy$21kAnimals$16kYouth Development$6kEnvironment$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k20 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $51k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $53k
$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$713k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PENN STATE$53,000
CLEVELAND CLINIC$20,000
GEISINGER HEALTH FOUNDATION$11,000
ALEXIS DE TOCQUIEVILLE SOCIETY$10,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF PA$10,000
JUNIATA VALLEY COUNCIL BSA$5,000
BPS FOUNDATION$5,000
PETS COME FIRST$5,000
STRAWBERRY FIELDS$2,500
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$2,000
KARLI SHORT BETTER TOMORROW FOUNDAT$1,555
THE ARC OF CENTRE COUNTY PA INC$1,030
CENTRE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$1,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$1,000
CENTRE SAFE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CENTRE SAFE: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ND
NY
OH
PA
NJ
MD
TN
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 24 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +60% since the first grant, against +59% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
17

Total granted

$1.4M
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+59%

Still filing today

58%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthAnimalsEnvironmentHuman ServicesEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS PENNSYLVANIA INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $44k · revenue +73%
  • GH
    GEISINGER HEALTH
    6× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue +235%
  • SF
    STRAWBERRY FIELDS INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $13k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • GH
    GESINGER HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • MN
    MOUNT NITTANY HEALTH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • BL
    BELLEFONTE LITTLE LEAGUE
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Center for Community Resources Inc

To coordinate services among private and government agencies for specialized populations to ensure service continuity, reduce duplication, and assist individuals and families in accessing appropriate mental health, intellectual…

Health
2
Monongahela Valley Hospital Inc

The mission of penn highlands mon valley is to enhance the health of the residents of the mid-monongahela valley area by providing outstanding healthcare services.

Health
3
Pocono Health System

We heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value supported by education and clinical research.

—
4
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
5
Penn Highlands Healthcare Inc

Our community-based and controlled health care system exists to improve regional access to a wide array of premier primary care and advanced health services while supporting a reverence for life and the worth and dignity of each individual.

Health
6
Penn State Health Holy Spirit Medical Center

The mission of penn state health holy spirit medical center is to nurture the healing ministry of the church, supported by education and research. fidelity to the gospel urges us to emphasize human dignity and social justice as we create…

Health
7
C-Net

C-net is organized to maintain and operated, on a not-for-profit basis, a government and education access network to inform the public on subjects useful and beneficial to the community via cable television channels and internet…

Arts & Culture
8
Chambersburg Hospital

The chambersburg hospital is a regional non-profit health care organization committed to the improvement of the health and well-being of the people in southcentral pennsylvania.

Health
9
Centerville Clinics Inc

Outpatient medical services

Health
10
Chester County Community Foundation

The chester county community foundation connects people who care with the causes that matter, so their philanthropy makes a difference now and forever.

Philanthropy
11
Hospice of Central Pennsylvania

Our vision is a community that embraces specialized care at the end of life with the same importance that is given at the beginning of life. our guiding principles are service - to make a difference in the lives of our patients/families,…

Human Services
12
The Milton S Hershey Medical Center

Mshmc's mission is to continually improve the health and well-being of the people in pennsylvania. the organization provides patients with excellent, compassionate, culturally responsive and equitable care, educate and trains healthcare…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Centre Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
17/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $1,081,500 · OtherPENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITYCLEVELAND CLINIC: $70,000 · OtherALEXIS DE TOCQUIEVILLE SOCIETY: $50,000 · Other+32 more: $133,051 · Other+32 moreGEISINGER HEALTH: $40,000 · HealthSTRAWBERRY FIELDS INC: $13,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $8,500 · HealthMOUNT NITTANY MEDICAL CENTER: $6,000 · HealthCENTRE VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE: $4,000 · Health+1 more: $200 · HealthPETS COME FIRST INC: $6,000 · AnimalsCENTRE COUNTY PAWS INC: $3,000 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $750 · AnimalsWILDLIFE FOR EVERYONE ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION: $4,600 · EnvironmentTHE CLEARWATER CONSERVANCY OF CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA INC: $2,000 · EnvironmentCENTRE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $2,000 · Arts & CultureCENTRE SAFE: $1,000 · Human ServicesBOB PERKS CANCER ASSISTANCE FUND: $600 · Human ServicesCENTRE FOUNDATION INC: $1,200 · Philanthropy
Other$1,334,551Health$71,700Animals$9,750Environment$6,600Arts & Culture$2,000Human Services$1,600Philanthropy$1,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS PENNSYLVANIA INC: $43,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetGEISINGER HEALTH: $40,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRE COUNTY UNITED WAY: $20,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSTRAWBERRY FIELDS INC: $13,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $8,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT NITTANY MEDICAL CENTER: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPETS COME FIRST INC: $6,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetWILDLIFE FOR EVERYONE ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION: $4,600 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCENTRE VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRE COUNTY PAWS INC: $3,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CLEARWATER CONSERVANCY OF CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCENTRE FOUNDATION INC: $1,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARC OF CENTRE COUNTY PA INC: $1,030 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRE SAFE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBELLEFONTE LITTLE LEAGUE: $1,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERFAITH HUMAN SERVICES INC: $800 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOB PERKS CANCER ASSISTANCE FUND: $600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBELLEFONTE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJANA MARIE FOUNDATION: $207 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS PENNSYLVANIA INC ↗
  • Who funds GEISINGER HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds CENTRE COUNTY UNITED WAY ↗
  • Who funds STRAWBERRY FIELDS INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT NITTANY MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PETS COME FIRST INC ↗
  • Who funds WILDLIFE FOR EVERYONE ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTRE VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE ↗
  • Who funds CENTRE COUNTY PAWS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CLEARWATER CONSERVANCY OF CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds CENTRE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC OF CENTRE COUNTY PA INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRE SAFE ↗
  • Who funds BELLEFONTE LITTLE LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INTERFAITH HUMAN SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds BOB PERKS CANCER ASSISTANCE FUND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Centre Foundation IncPA28.2× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Centre Foundation Inc · The Hamer Foundation · The Blake and Linda Gall Family Foundation · The Happy Valley Adventure Bureau · The Louis E Silvi Foundation · Garver David B for Charity - Char Tr · Centre County United Way · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Poole Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Poole Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Poole’s filings →

    More from the funding graph