Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Pollock Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$193k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$1.1MPhilanthropy$120kCommunity Improvement$106kReligion$71kEducation$52kHealth$36kCrime & Legal$20kArts & Culture$12kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$300k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE BRIDGE FUND OF NEW YORK$150,000
AMERICAN COUNCIL FOR CAPITAL FORMATION$15,000
PHILIPS EXETER ACADEMY$10,000
MARYKNOLL SISTERS -CONTEMPLATIVE COMMUNITY$10,000
NEIGHBORS LINK$5,000
EDMEE FIRTH FUND FOR RESEARCH IN OVARIAN CANCER$1,000
THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE$1,000
WILDLIFE CENTER OF LI$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%THE BRIDGE FUND OF NEW YORK: $123k → 17%THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE: $1k → 9%MARTIN DE PORRES GROUP HOMES: $2k → 13%THE BRIDGE FUND OF NEW YORK: $100k → 17%THE BRIDGE FUND OF NEW YORK: $200k → 9%THE BRIDGE FUND OF NEW YORK: $200k → 9%THE BRIDGE FUND OF NEW YORK: $150k → 9%THE BRIDGE FUND OF NEW YORK: $100k → 9%THE BRIDGE FUND OF NEW YORK: $100k → 9%THE BRIDGE FUND OF NEW YORK: $100k → 9%NEIGHBORS LINK: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 7 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +7% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
4

Total granted

$1.4M
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+6%

Still filing today

71%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    THE BRIDGE FUND OF NEW YORK INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +7%
  • PHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY
    7× · 2017–2024 · $51k · revenue +65%
  • PB
    PRO BONO PARTNERSHIP INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $20k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • WC
    WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • TO
    THE OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -39%
  • MD
    MARTIN DE PORRES YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Office of the Appellate Defender

Oad strives to ensure that poor people convicted of felonies receive full and equal access to justice by providing exceptional appellate representation, improving the quality of indigent defense representation through education & training,…

Crime & Legal
6
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
8
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
The New York Center for Children

The new york center for children provides trauma-focused therapy services to victims of child abuse, free of charge, for as long as their healing requires.

Human Services
11
The Baruch College Fund

The baruch college fund is an organization engaged in generating, encouraging and promoting the educational welfare of the students of the bernard m. baruch college of the city university of new york.

Education
12
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Children's Village Inc; the most unlike its peers is Phillips Exeter Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE BRIDGE FUND OF NEW YORK INC: $1,072,500 · Human ServicesTHE BRIDGE FUND OF NEW YORK INC+3 more: $8,000 · Human ServicesTHE BRIDGE FUND OF NEW YORK CITY: $120,000 · OtherTHE BRIDGE FUND OF NEW YOR…AMERICAN COUNCIL FOR CAPITAL FORMATION: $106,000 · OtherAMERICAN COUNCIL FOR CAPIT…MARYKNOLL SISTERS: $61,000 · OtherMARYKNOLL SISTERSWEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE: $25,000 · OtherWEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLL…PRO BONO PARTNERSHIP INC: $20,000 · OtherPRO BONO PARTNERSHIP INC+3 more: $12,000 · OtherPHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY: $51,000 · EducationKATONAH MUSEUM OF ART: $12,000 · Arts & CultureTHE OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyWILDLIFE CENTER OF LONG ISLAND INC: $500 · Animals
Human Services$1,080,500Other$344,000Education$51,000Arts & Culture$12,000Philanthropy$10,000Animals$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BRIDGE FUND OF NEW YORK INC: $1,072,500 over 8y, 5.8% of budgetAMERICAN COUNCIL FOR CAPITAL FORMATION: $106,000 over 7y, 5.8% of budgetPHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY: $51,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPRO BONO PARTNERSHIP INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetKATONAH MUSEUM OF ART: $12,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEIGHBORS LINK CORP: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARTIN DE PORRES YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILDLIFE CENTER OF LONG ISLAND INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BRIDGE FUND OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN COUNCIL FOR CAPITAL FORMATION ↗
  • Who funds PHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds PRO BONO PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds KATONAH MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds THE OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORS LINK CORP ↗
  • Who funds MARTIN DE PORRES YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds WILDLIFE CENTER OF LONG ISLAND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Pollock Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Pollock Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Pollock Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Pollock Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pollock’s filings →

    More from the funding graph