Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Peter Jennings Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$225k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$380kHousing & Shelter$310kCrime & Legal$220kHuman Services$200kCivil Rights$170kInternational$150kReligion$40kYouth Development$30kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $175k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEACH FOR AMERICA$40,000
WOMEN IN NEED INC$25,000
THE BRIDGEHAMPTON CHILDCARE & RECREATIONAL CENTER$15,000
COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS$15,000
THE LEGAL AID SOCIETY$15,000
RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK$15,000
SOLA$10,000
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATIONAL FUND INC$10,000
COMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS$10,000
CONCERN WORLDWIDE US INC$10,000
EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE$10,000
THE INNOCENCE PROJECT$5,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$5,000
ALIENTO$5,000
NRDC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $360k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 54% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%THE BRIDGEHAMPTON CHILDCARE & RECREATIONAL CENTER: $30k → 7%THE BRIDGEHAMPTON CHILDCARE & RECREATIONAL CENTER: $30k → 7%THE BRIDGEHAMPTON CHILDCARE & RECREATIONAL CENTER: $30k → 7%THE BRIDGEHAMPTON CHILDCARE & RECREATIONAL CENTER: $30k → 7%THE BRIDGEHAMPTON CHILDCARE & RECREATIONAL CENTER: $15k → 7%THE BRIDGEHAMPTON CHILDCARE & RECREATIONAL CENTER: $15k → 7%THE BRIDGEHAMPTON CHILDCARE & RECREATIONAL CENTER: $15k → 7%WOMEN IN NEED INC: $25k → 17%WOMEN IN NEED INC: $25k → 17%WOMEN IN NEED INC: $25k → 17%WOMEN IN NEED INC: $25k → 17%WOMEN IN NEED INC: $25k → 17%WOMEN IN NEED INC: $25k → 17%WOMEN IN NEED INC: $25k → 17%THE INNOCENCE PROJECT: $5k → 17%THE INNOCENCE PROJECT: $5k → 17%THE INNOCENCE PROJECT: $5k → 17%THE INNOCENCE PROJECT: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
RI
CA
AZ
DC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 29 repeat orgs$65k to everyone else

29 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
6

Total granted

$1.6M
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+85%
+1174%

Still filing today

76%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
Civil RightsEducationInternationalHuman ServicesCrime & LegalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WOMEN IN NEED INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $175k · revenue +127%
  • BC
    Bridgehampton Child Care and Recreational Center Inc
    7× · 2017–2024 · $165k · revenue +157%
  • COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $115k · revenue +95%

Funded once

  • TR
    THE RESEARCH FOUNDAITON OF THE CUNY
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • KN
    KIPP NEW JERSEY
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • TS
    THE SBS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
2
Washington Office On Latin America

To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.

International
3
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
4
International Crisis Group

Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…

International
5
Immigrant Justice Corps Inc

Ijc's mission is to recruit, train, and populate the immigration field with the highest quality legal advocates to create a new generation of leaders with a lifelong commitment to immigrant justice.

Crime & Legal
6
Equal Justice Center

The Equal Justice Center is a non-profit law firm and employment justice organization which empowers low-income families, workers, and communities to achieve fair treatment in the workplace, in the justice system, and in our shared society…

Civil Rights
7
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
8
Liberty Justice Center

To advance economic and social liberties and a free enterprise society through strategic litigation, training, communication, activism and research. in addition, the center will train law students, lawyers and policy activists in the…

Crime & Legal
9
Human Rights Watch Inc

Human rights watch ("hrw") defends the rights of people worldwide. we scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. human rights watch is an independent,…

International
10
Center for International Environmental Law Inc

To investigate, research, write, publish, present conferences and teach with respect to global, regional, transboundary, and comparative environmental issues and to make the findings from such activities available to the general public; to…

International
11
The International Legal Foundation Ltd

The ilf's mission is to make justice a reality for poor people by fighting to guarantee high-quality legal representation for everyone arrested or detained. around the world, we provide criminal defense services and build sustainable,…

International
12
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Immigration Law Center; the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
21/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $114,600 · OtherCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INCPETER JENNINGS SCHOLARSHIP LAUREL AWARDS CUNY: $45,000 · OtherPETER JENNINGS SCHOLARSHIP LAUR…SOLA: $40,000 · OtherSOLAIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSCHOOL OF LEADERSHIP-AFGHANISTAN INC: $30,000 · OtherSCHOOL OF LEADERSHIP-AFGHANISTA…FRIENDS OF TEAM ACADEMY: $30,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF TEAM ACADEMYTHE SENTENCING PROJECT: $25,000 · OtherTHE SENTENCING PROJECTOXFAM INTERNATIONAL: $20,000 · OtherRESEARCH FOUNDATION OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $15,000 · OtherNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $25,000 · OtherNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNC…HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $20,000 · Other+6 more: $55,000 · Other+6 moreWOMEN IN NEED INC: $175,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN IN NEED INCBridgehampton Child Care and Recreational Center Inc: $165,000 · Human ServicesBridgehampton Child Care…THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT IN…Teach for America Inc: $280,000 · EducationTeach for America In…CALIFORNIA FARMWORKER FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Education+2 more: $10,000 · EducationNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $70,000 · Civil RightsNAACP LEGAL DEF…EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $70,000 · Civil RightsEQUAL JUSTICE I…COMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS INC: $50,000 · Civil RightsCOMMITTEE TO PR…REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES: $20,000 · Civil RightsREFUGEE & IMMIG…NATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER: $10,000 · Civil RightsCONCERN WORLDWIDE (US) INC: $70,000 · InternationalCONCERN WO…International Rescue Committee INC: $55,000 · InternationalInternatio…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $20,000 · InternationalWORLD CENT…Digital Citizen Fund Inc: $5,000 · InternationalTHE LEGAL AID SOCIETY: $105,000 · Crime & LegalSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $20,000 · Crime & LegalBOB WOODRUFF FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · HealthSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $10,000 · Health
Other$449,600Human Services$360,000Education$300,000Civil Rights$220,000International$150,000Crime & Legal$125,000Health$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTeach for America Inc: $280,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN IN NEED INC: $175,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBridgehampton Child Care and Recreational Center Inc: $165,000 over 7y, 3.4% of budgetCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $114,600 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetTHE LEGAL AID SOCIETY: $105,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $70,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCONCERN WORLDWIDE (US) INC: $70,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $70,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $55,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSCHOOL OF LEADERSHIP-AFGHANISTAN INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SENTENCING PROJECT: $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBOB WOODRUFF FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA FARMWORKER FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetDigital Citizen Fund Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetAMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONE MILLION DEGREES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN IN NEED INC ↗
  • Who funds Bridgehampton Child Care and Recreational Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LEGAL AID SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CONCERN WORLDWIDE (US) INC ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds SCHOOL OF LEADERSHIP-AFGHANISTAN INC ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SENTENCING PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds BOB WOODRUFF FAMILY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC ↗
  • Who funds REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA FARMWORKER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Digital Citizen Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ONE MILLION DEGREES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Peter Jennings Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Peter Jennings Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Peter Jennings Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Peter Jennings Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Peter Jennings’ filings →

    More from the funding graph