Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Peter J Palermo Trust Under Agreement

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$200k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$103k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$735kEnvironment$5k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $85k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $103k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SIENA COLLEGE$102,500
SUNY BINGHAMTON$30,000
SUNY BUFFALO -STATE UNIVERSITY NY$30,000
JOHN JAY COLLEGE$25,000
ALL SAINTS CATHOLIC ACADEMY$6,000
SUNY NEW PALTZ$2,500
Blessed Sacrament School$2,000
Mater Christi School$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 90% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SUNY GENESEO: $5k → 11%COLGATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 11%THE SAGE COLLEGE: $5k → 11%UNION COLLEGE: $5k → 12%SUNY BUFFALO -STATE UNIVERSITY NY: $30k → 13%SUNY PLATTSBURGH: $13k → 14%ROCHESTER INST OF TECHNOLOGY: $8k → 14%SIENA COLLEGE: $103k → 14%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $8k → 16%SUNY NEW PALTZ: $20k → 16%ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 18%SUNY BINGHAMTON: $30k → 20%MANHATTAN COLLEGE: $5k → 28%SUNY GENESEO: $5k → 11%COLGATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 11%THE SAGE COLLEGE: $5k → 11%UNION COLLEGE: $5k → 12%SUNY PLATTSBURGH: $5k → 14%ROCHESTER INST OF TECHNOLOGY: $8k → 14%SIENA COLLEGE: $10k → 14%SUNY NEW PALTZ: $8k → 16%ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 18%SIENA COLLEGE: $10k → 14%SUNY NEW PALTZ: $8k → 16%ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 18%SIENA COLLEGE: $8k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $5k → 14%JOHN JAY COLLEGE: $25k → 17%UNIVERSITY AT ALBANY: $15k → 14%UNIVERSITY AT ALBANY: $8k → 14%UNIVERSITY AT ALBANY: $5k → 14%SUNY ALBANY: $5k → 14%SUNY ALBANY: $5k → 14%ALBANY COLLEGE OF PHARMHLTH SCI: $5k → 14%ALBANY COLLEGE OF PHARMHLTH SCI: $5k → 14%ALBANY COLLEGE PHARMACYHEALTH SCIENCES: $5k → 14%ALBANY COLLEGE PHARMACYHEALTH SCIENCES: $5k → 14%ALL SAINTS CATHOLIC ACADEMY: $40k → 14%ALL SAINTS CATHOLIC ACADEMY: $10k → 14%ALL SAINTS CATHOLIC ACADEMY: $10k → 14%ALL SAINTS CATHOLIC ACADEMY: $10k → 14%ALL SAINTS CATHOLIC ACADEMY: $10k → 14%ALL SAINTS CATHOLIC ACADEMY: $10k → 14%ALL SAINTS CATHOLIC ACADEMY: $10k → 14%ALL SAINTS CATHOLIC ACADEMY: $10k → 14%COLLEGE OF ST ROSE: $8k → 14%ALL SAINTS CATHOLIC ACADEMY: $6k → 14%SIENA COLLEGE: $30k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$641k · 33 repeat orgs$92k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.

33 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 29 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
13

Total granted

$641k
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+23%

Still filing today

42%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $59k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SU
    SIENA UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2025 · $168k · revenue +35%
  • Rochester Institute of Technology
    3× · 2017–2019 · $18k · revenue +61%
  • ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2017–2019 · $15k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • UA
    UNIVERSITY AT ROCHESTER (SUNY ROCHESTER)
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • BU
    BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • LM
    Le Moyne College
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +23%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
2
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
Roger Williams University

At Roger Williams University, students are prepared to be thinkers and doers ready to solve challenging problems with innovative solutions. RWU offers robust offerings of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs across eight…

Education
5
Molloy University

Molloy university, an independent catholic university, rooted in the dominican tradition of study, spirituality, service, and community, is committed to academic excellence with respect for each person. through transformative education,…

Education
6
Sarah Lawrence College

At sarah lawrence college, our mission is to graduate citizens of the world who are diverse in every definition of the word, who take intellectual and creative risks, and who are able to focus exceptional intellectual discipline (continued…

Education
7
The Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science & Art

See schedule ovision: the cooper union for the advancement of science and art is dedicated to peter cooper's radical commitment to diversity and his founding vision that fair access to an inspiring free education and forums for courageous…

Education
8
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
9
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
10
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
11
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

12
Macalester College

Macalester is committed to being a preeminent liberal arts college with an educational program known for its high standards for scholarship and its special emphasis on internationalism, multiculturalism, and service to society.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fordham University and the most unlike its peers is Siena University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 78 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr20%5%20–35yr13%10%35–55yr16%86%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr20%1%20–35yr13%10%35–55yr16%90%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/21
the rest of the field
11%
4,491/41,888

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
16/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ALL SAINTS CATHOLIC ACADEMY — $116,000 · OtherALL SAINTS CATHOLIC ACADEMYSUNY NEW PALTZ — $40,000 · OtherSUNY NEW PALTZSUNY BINGHAMTON — $35,000 · OtherSUNY BINGHAMTONSUNY BUFFALO -STATE UNIVERSITY NY — $30,000 · OtherSUNY BUFFALO -STATE UNIVERSITY NYUNIVERSITY AT ALBANY — $30,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY AT ALBANYSUNY PLATTSBURGH — $17,500 · OtherALBANY COLLEGE OF PHARMHLTH SCI — $15,000 · Other+24 more — $124,000 · Other+24 moreSIENA UNIVERSITY — $167,500 · EducationSIENA UNIVERSITYJOHN JAY COLLEGE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE STUDENT ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATION INC — $25,000 · EducationJOHN JAY COLLEGE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE STUDENT ACTIV…Rochester Institute of Technology — $17,500 · EducationST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY — $15,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER — $12,500 · Education+15 more — $95,000 · Education+15 more
Other$407,500Education$332,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSIENA UNIVERSITY — $167,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetJOHN JAY COLLEGE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE STUDENT ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetRochester Institute of Technology — $17,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER — $12,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLGATE UNIVERSITY — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRensselaer Polytechnic Institute — $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRUSSELL SAGE COLLEGE — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPRATT INSTITUTE — $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBARNARD COLLEGE — $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetManhattan University — $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFordham University — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOFSTRA UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCLARKSON UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLe Moyne College — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUTICA UNIVERSITY — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARIST UNIVERSITY — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAZENOVIA COLLEGE — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SIENA UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds JOHN JAY COLLEGE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE STUDENT ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds Rochester Institute of Technology
  • Who funds ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER
  • Who funds Cornell University
  • Who funds COLGATE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
  • Who funds RUSSELL SAGE COLLEGE
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK
  • Who funds PRATT INSTITUTE
  • Who funds BARNARD COLLEGE
  • Who funds Manhattan University
  • Who funds Fordham University
  • Who funds HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds CLARKSON UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Le Moyne College

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Peter J Palermo Trust Under Agreement funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph