Skip to content

· Public charity

The Peanut Institute Foundation Inc

To provide research on peanuts and peanut products.

$353k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$151k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$856kHealth$819kFood & Nutrition$345kRecreation & Sports$75k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $316,947, the rows itemized in this filing. The $352,589 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $35,642 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $267k
$52,597
Median grant
4
States reached
$918k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY$151,200
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY$63,150
LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY$52,597
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS - ARLINGTON$30,000
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 85% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $60k → 10%HARVARD TH CHAN SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH: $100k → 16%PENN STATE UNIVERSITY: $175k → 16%LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY: $70k → 14%INC NUTRITION RESEARCH & EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $6k → 16%TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $20k → 22%FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY: $151k → 19%AUBURN UNIVERSITY: $150k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN: $15k → 10%VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $64k → 14%AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY: $53k → 18%MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY: $32k → 24%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY: $84k → 8%VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE: $56k → 21%UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $26k → 10%HARVARD TH CHAN SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH: $80k → 16%LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY: $53k → 14%INC NUTRITION RESEARCH & EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $4k → 16%VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $175k → 14%AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY: $23k → 18%MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY: $14k → 24%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY: $63k → 8%VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE: $19k → 21%HARVARD TH CHAN SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH: $75k → 16%LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY: $53k → 14%INC NUTRITION RESEARCH & EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
DE
TN
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $36k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Australia$36k · 100% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: PEANUT BUTTER AS A STRATEGY TO IMPROVE OLDER ADULTS PHYSICAL CAPACITY

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 22% of The Peanut Institute Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Peanut Institute Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.8% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 9 repeat orgs$660k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
5

Total granted

$1.0M
$489k

Still filing today

22%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $171k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VU
    Vanderbilt University Medical Center
    2× · 2018–2024 · $239k · revenue +110%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON
    2× · 2019–2020 · $225k
  • RU
    RUTGERS UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $147k

Funded once

  • PS
    PENN STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $175k
  • AU
    AUBURN UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $150k
  • PF
    PESIDENT & FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE
    one grant, 2018 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
05the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
4/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON: $224,916 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF HOUSTONPENN STATE UNIVERSITY: $175,000 · OtherPENN STATE UNIVERSITYFLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY: $151,200 · OtherFLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITYAUBURN UNIVERSITY: $150,000 · OtherAUBURN UNIVERSITYRUTGERS UNIVERSITY: $147,350 · OtherRUTGERS UNIVERSITYUNIV OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON: $100,000 · OtherUNIV OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTONPESIDENT & FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE: $100,000 · OtherPESIDENT & FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGEUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $85,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF DELAWAREVIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE: $75,082 · OtherAUGUSTA UNIVERSITY: $75,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT HEALTH CENTER: $49,000 · Other+4 more: $93,939 · Other+4 morePresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $255,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows o…LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY: $175,324 · EducationLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITYVanderbilt University Medical Center: $239,000 · HealthVanderbilt U…
Other$1,426,487Education$430,324Health$239,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $255,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University Medical Center: $239,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY: $175,324 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $85,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Peanut Institute Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Peanut Institute Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 25%
  • University of Delaware: 25% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Peanut Institute’s filings →

More from the funding graph