Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Paulea Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$50k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$87kHuman Services$59kHealth$53kHousing & Shelter$39kEducation$38kRecreation & Sports$35kYouth Development$30kPhilanthropy$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$918k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOUSTON FOOD BANK$8,000
MEALS ON WHEELS$7,000
COVENANT HOUSE$5,000
THE MONTROSE CENTER$5,000
STAR OF HOPE$5,000
CAMP ARANZAZU$5,000
COLE GORDON HELPING HANDS$5,000
TUNNELS TO TOWERS$5,000
LIFE HOUSE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $66k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CAMP ARANZAU: $8k → 17%CAMP ARANZAZU: $7k → 17%TONY'S PLACE: $5k → 16%CAMP ARANZAZU: $5k → 17%CAMP ARANZAZU: $5k → 17%CAMP ARANZAZU: $5k → 17%MEALS ON WHEELS: $7k → 16%CAMP ARANZAU: $5k → 17%MEALS ON WHEELS: $7k → 16%MEALS ON WHEELS: $7k → 16%MEALS ON WHEELS: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$338k · 12 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
4

Total granted

$338k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+208%

Still filing today

83%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalPhilanthropyHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • The Houston Food Bank
    6× · 2019–2024 · $56k · revenue +109%
  • CH
    COVENANT HOUSE TEXAS
    6× · 2019–2024 · $39k · revenue +3%
  • LI
    LIFEHOUSE INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $38k · revenue +92%

Funded once

  • LL
    LYC - LIGHTHOUSE CHARITY TEAM
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • TP
    Tony's Placegraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +773%
  • IM
    Interfaith Ministries for Greater Houstongraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +208%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Forgotten Angels Inc

To provide quality care to children and adults with developmental disabilities in a safe, loving home environment where they are treated with respect, compassion, and dignity and provided the means, support, and encouragement to reach…

Human Services
2
Covenant House Washington Dc

Covenant house washington, dc ("chw") provides shelter, crisis care, community services, and outreach services to youth in the washington dc area.

Human Services
3
Chicago House & Social Service Agency

Provides housing and support services to individuals and families impacted by hiv/aids

Health
4
Covenant House Georgia Inc

Covenant house georgia provides shelters, protects and advocates on behalf of homeless, trafficked, runaway and sexually exploited youth.

—
5
Covenant House New Orleans

Covenant house new orleans (the organization) is a not-for-profit organization affiliated with 34 similar organizations across five countries, all of which are affiliates of covenant house international (parent affiliate) and share a…

Human Services
6
Under 21

Since 1972, under 21, d.b.a. covenant house new york (chny) has been working with one of new york city's most vulnerable populations - youth experiencing homelessness, age 16-24, and their dependent children. chny provides young people…

Human Services
7
LifeHouse of Houston Inc

LifeHouse is a Christ-centered ministry ensuring life for unborn children by providing opportunities for housing, help, and hope for young women during their pregnancies and beyond.

—
8
Sunny Glen Children's Home Inc

Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.

Human Services
9
Covenant House

In 34 cities across five countries, covenant house builds bridges to hope for young people facing homelessness and survivors of human trafficking. we meet their immediate needs for food, clothing, protection, and medical and mental health…

Human Services
10
Covenant House California

Covenant house is dedicated to serving all of god's children with absolute respect and unconditional love to help youth experiencing homelessness and to protect and safeguard all youth in need.

Human Services
11
Magnificat Houses Inc

Magnificat Houses, Inc. offers a welcoming community where those needing housing, food and mental health programs can grow in stability, productivity and independence.

Health
12
Youth and Family Alliance

Youth and family alliance (dba lifeworks) is a fearless advocate for youth and young adults pursuing a life they love and a stable future for themselves and their families. we strive to break cycles of instability by providing support and…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Star of Hope Mission; the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Houston Food Bank: $55,500 · OtherThe Houston Food BankLIFEHOUSE INC: $37,500 · OtherLIFEHOUSE INCLYC CONCOURSE CORP: $25,000 · OtherLYC CONCOURSE CORPCOLE GORDON HELPING HANDS: $15,000 · OtherCOLE GORDON HELPING HANDSLYC - LIGHTHOUSE CHARITY TEAM: $5,000 · OtherInterfaith Ministries for Greater Houston: $5,000 · OtherCOVENANT HOUSE TEXAS: $39,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE TEXASCamp Aranzazu Inc: $34,500 · Human ServicesCamp Aranzazu IncMEALS ON WHEELS: $26,000 · Human ServicesMEALS ON WHEELSTony's Place: $5,000 · Human ServicesSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $37,500 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLE…THE CENTER FOR HEARING AND SPEECH: $5,000 · EducationTHE CENTER FO…STAR OF HOPE MISSION: $39,000 · Housing & ShelterSTAR OF HOPE…The Montrose Center: $10,000 · HealthLYC CONCOURS CORPORATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyCHILD ADVOCATES INC: $9,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$143,000Human Services$104,500Education$42,500Housing & Shelter$39,000Health$10,000Philanthropy$10,000Crime & Legal$9,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $55,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSTAR OF HOPE MISSION: $39,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE TEXAS: $39,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLIFEHOUSE INC: $37,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $37,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCamp Aranzazu Inc: $34,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS: $26,000 over 4y, 5.3% of budgetThe Montrose Center: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLYC CONCOURS CORPORATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCHILD ADVOCATES INC: $9,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTony's Place: $5,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetInterfaith Ministries for Greater Houston: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR HEARING AND SPEECH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Houston Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds STAR OF HOPE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds LIFEHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Camp Aranzazu Inc ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds The Montrose Center ↗
  • Who funds LYC CONCOURS CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILD ADVOCATES INC ↗
  • Who funds Tony's Place ↗
  • Who funds Interfaith Ministries for Greater Houston ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR HEARING AND SPEECH ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Paulea Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Paulea Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Paulea Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph