Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Patrick and Catherine Weldon Donaghue Medical Research Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$3.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$275k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$13MEducation$11MSocial Science$1.5MHuman Services$319kHousing & Shelter$119kPublic Benefit$25kEnvironment$12kPhilanthropy$860
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $93k
  • $50k–250k16 grants · $2.5M
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.1M
$160,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$81M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EMORY UNIVERSITY$275,000
BECKMAN REASEARCH INSTITUTE CITY OF HOPE$272,839
THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$269,057
BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH$258,135
HARVARD PILGRIM HEALTH CARE INC$246,520
VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY$240,119
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$217,679
UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER$217,672
THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$214,795
THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$167,257
THE HASTINGS CENTER$160,000
RAND$151,220
TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS$132,158
BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER$123,818
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO$121,494
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $135k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FUND FOR THE AGED INC: $74k → 17%FUND FOR THE AGED INC: $61k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
CT
RI
CA
UT
MO
VA
MD
KS
NC
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of The Patrick and Catherine Weldon Donaghue Medical Research Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Patrick and Catherine Weldon Donaghue Medical Research Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.5% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$19M · 49 repeat orgs$3.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

49 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 38 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

49
30

Total granted

$19M
$2.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+30%

Still filing today

43%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesPublic BenefitHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2018–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +51%
  • TH
    The Hastings Center Inc
    7× · 2018–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +64%
  • TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2021–2025 · $678k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • AO
    ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGESgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $231k · revenue +79%
  • UO
    University of Michigangraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $221k · revenue +140% · 84% of their budget
  • RO
    REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
    one grant, 2020 · $216k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
3
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
4
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
5
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
6
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
9
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
10
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
11
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
12
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Johns Hopkins University; the most unlike its peers is Wake Forest University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 89 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/35
Grantees still filing
30/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Hastings Center Inc: $1,310,000 · OtherThe Hastings Center IncTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $677,937 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $668,929 · OtherMASSACHUSETTES GENERAL HOSPITAL: $599,997 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $526,700 · Other+55 more: $9,753,073 · Other+55 moreJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $2,021,789 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $1,746,004 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PEN…President and Fellows of Harvard College: $1,202,334 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard …DUKE UNIVERSITY: $599,862 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYUniversity of Chicago: $460,860 · EducationUniversity of ChicagoUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $435,395 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $324,458 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $264,246 · Education+5 more: $707,269 · Education+5 moreChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $590,701 · HealthChildren's Hospita…BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION: $563,816 · HealthBOSTON MEDICAL CEN…ACADEMYHEALTH: $554,865 · HealthACADEMYHEALTHDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $528,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer…BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $491,142 · HealthBETH ISRAEL DEACON…WOMAN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION D/B/A WOMAN'S HOSPITAL: $436,667 · HealthWOMAN'S HOSPITAL F…KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON: $399,917 · HealthKAISER FOUNDATION …HARVARD PILGRIM HEALTH CARE INC: $358,992 · HealthHARVARD PILGRIM HE…THE NEMOURS FOUNDATION: $311,738 · HealthTHE NEMOURS FOUNDA…+3 more: $161,781 · HealthBROWN UNIVERSITY: $310,326 · Community ImprovementThe Rand Corporation: $151,220 · Public BenefitFUND FOR THE AGED INC: $134,996 · Human ServicesLEADINGAGE INC: $118,712 · Housing & Shelter
Other$13,536,636Education$7,762,217Health$4,397,619Community Improvement$310,326Public Benefit$151,220Human Services$134,996Housing & Shelter$118,712

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $2,021,789 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $1,746,004 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetThe Hastings Center Inc: $1,310,000 over 7y, 6.4% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $1,202,334 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $677,937 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $599,862 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $590,701 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION: $563,816 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetACADEMYHEALTH: $554,865 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $528,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $491,142 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $460,860 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWOMAN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION D/B/A WOMAN'S HOSPITAL: $436,667 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $435,395 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON: $399,917 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHARVARD PILGRIM HEALTH CARE INC: $358,992 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $324,458 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEMOURS FOUNDATION: $311,738 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $310,326 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $264,246 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES: $231,180 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $221,280 over 1y, 84% of budgetThe George Washington University: $192,105 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University: $152,974 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN JEWISH HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $144,406 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFUND FOR THE AGED INC: $134,996 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetLEADINGAGE INC: $118,712 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College: $70,510 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $60,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION CENTER FOR BEST PRACTICES: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTH RESEARCH ALLIANCE INC: $13,375 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetNC PREVENTION PARTNERS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetOPTIMUS HEALTH CARE INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT HEALTH ADVANCEMENT AND RESEARCH TRUST INC: $500 over 2y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds The Hastings Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds ACADEMYHEALTH ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds WOMAN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION D/B/A WOMAN'S HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON ↗
  • Who funds HARVARD PILGRIM HEALTH CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds THE NEMOURS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Robert Wood Johnson FoundationNJ14.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Patrick and Catherine Weldon Donaghue Medical Research Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Patrick and Catherine Weldon Donaghue Medical Research Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Inc: 37% of income from government
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation: 23% of income from government
  • Optimus Health Care Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc: 6% of income from government
  • The Nemours Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Patrick and Catherine Weldon Donaghue Medical Research Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Patrick and Catherine Weldon Donaghue Medical Research Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 89 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Patrick and Catherine Weldon Donaghue Medical Research’s filings →

More from the funding graph