Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Parman Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$16kPhilanthropy$8kPublic Benefit$7kCommunity Improvement$5kSocial Science$4kArts & Culture$3kReligion$2kHealth$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$258k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MISES INSTITUTE$3,500
RIVIERA BEACH CHAMPION ACADEMY$3,500
OKLAHOMA COUNCIL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS$1,500
REDBUD FOUNDATION$1,500
AMAZING CHURCH$1,500
OKLAHOMA CONTEMPORARY$1,000
THE ROTARY FOUNDATION$1,000
ST AGATHA CATHOLIC SCHOOL$1,000
FRIENDS OF OKLAHOMA ARTS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 78% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%AMAZING CHURCH: $2k → 28%FRIENDS OF OKLAHOMA ARTS: $1k → 16%ANGLOSPHERE SOCIETY: $500 → 14%RIVIERA BEACH CHAMPION ACADEMY: $4k → 11%ST AGATHA CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $1k → 15%MISES INSTITUTE: $4k → 15%SARA DOLITTLE: $8k → 15%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $6k → 18%THE ROTARY FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%TEWKSBURY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $500 → 4%CREST HAVEN ACADEMY: $5k → 10%AMAZING CHURCH: $350 → 28%OKLAHOMA COUNCIL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS: $5k → 16%CHLOE SMITH: $8k → 15%MANE STREAM: $2k → 4%CRESTHAVEN ACADEMY: $5k → 10%OCPA: $5k → 16%KIRBY STEVENS SCHOLARSHIP: $8k → 15%OKLAHOMA COUNCIL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS: $2k → 16%SIDNEY KING: $3k → 15%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $2k → 16%ALBANY CARNEGIE LIBRARY: $2k → 15%BOY SCOUT TROOP 102: $500 → 15%GRANDVIEW CEMETERY: $500 → 15%JAMES H WARD CITIZENSHIP SCHOLARSHIP: $500 → 15%NEW HAMPTON FOSTER CEMETERY: $500 → 15%FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH: $100 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
IA
NJ
MO
DC
OK
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

25%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$18k · 3 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
16

Total granted

$18k
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+53%

Still filing today

33%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 21% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24
Public Safety & DisasterArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CREST HAVEN ACADEMY
    2× · 2020–2022 · $10k
  • OC
    OKLAHOMA COUNCIL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $7k · revenue +7%
  • AC
    AMAZING CHURCH
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tulsa Regional Chamber (Fka Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of Commerce)

The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.

—
2
Manhattan Institute for Policy Research Inc

The manhattan institute is a community of scholars, journalists, activists, and civic leaders dedicated to advancing opportunity, individual liberty, and the rule of law in america and its great cities.

Public Benefit
3
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
4
Tulsa Legacy Charter School

To prepare students for college through a rigorous arts infused program.

Education
5
The Roosevelt Institute

To create a nation where everyone enjoys a fair share of our collective prosperity.

Education
6
The International Institute for Strategic Studies - Us

To provide accurate, objective information and analysis on international strategic issues for legislators, diplomats, foreign affairs analysts, international business leaders, economists, the military, defense commentators, journalists,…

International
7
Consortium for International Studies Inc

To develop educational materials and testing for higher education credit recommendations and to support educational and charitable organizations both in the u.s. and in israel.

Religion
8
Ripon Society Inc

To provide a forum for the discussion of policy issues and mechanism for research into those issues; to promote general welfare of people of the community.

—
9
World Future Society

The world future society works to improve decision-making about the future by empowering futurists, fostering networks and advancing knowledge and action on future critical issues.

—
10
The Institute for Foreign Policy Analysis Inc

The institute performs research which has a three-fold purpose: to examine issues of u.s. foreign policy, formulate policy options and programs for submission to u.s. government agencies and dissemination to the public, and to train…

—
11
National Institute for Public Policy Inc

The institute works as a public education organization that focuses on a wide spectrum of rapidly evolving foreign policy and international issues.

—
12
Hampden-Sydney College

Since 1775, the mission of Hampden-Sydney College has been to form good men and good citizens in an atmosphere of sound learning.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Tewksbury Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CREST HAVEN ACADEMY: $10,000 · OtherCREST HAVEN ACADEMYIndividual grant recipient: $7,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $7,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $7,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $6,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATIONOCPA: $5,000 · OtherOCPALUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE FOR AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS INC: $3,500 · OtherLUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE FOR AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS INCRIVIERA BEACH CHAMPION ACADEMY: $3,500 · OtherRIVIERA BEACH CHAMPION ACADEMYIndividual grant recipient: $2,500 · Other+13 more: $12,525 · Other+13 moreOKLAHOMA COUNCIL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS INC: $6,500 · Public Safety & DisasterOKLAHOMA …THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $1,000 · InternationalOKLAHOMA CONTEMPORARY ARTS CENTER INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureTHE TEWKSBURY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $500 · Philanthropy
Other$65,525Public Safety & Disaster$6,500International$1,000Arts & Culture$1,000Philanthropy$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOKLAHOMA COUNCIL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS INC: $6,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE FOR AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMane Stream Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA CONTEMPORARY ARTS CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TEWKSBURY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $500 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OKLAHOMA COUNCIL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS INC ↗
  • Who funds LUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE FOR AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS INC ↗
  • Who funds Mane Stream Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA CONTEMPORARY ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TEWKSBURY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE ANGLOSPHERE SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Parman Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Parman Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Mane Stream Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Parman Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph