Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Parkman Family Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$58k
Granted FY2020
11
Grants FY2020
7
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Recreation & Sports$113kAnimals$63kEducation$50kHuman Services$39kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kPhilanthropy$10kFood & Nutrition$5kArts & Culture$1k
02FY2020 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k9 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$3,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SEMPER FI AND AMERICA'S FUND$15,000
GREATER BOSTON CHARITY HORSESHOWS$15,000
NH HORSE & TRAIL ASSOC$9,000
Individual grant recipient$7,500
PETSAVER FOUNDATIONNORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA$5,000
GASPARILLA CHARITY HORSE SHOWNATIONAL HORSEMAN$3,000
TWIN STATE AMERICAN SADDLEBRED ASSOC$1,000
UNITED PROFESSIONAL HORSEMEN ASSOC$1,000
FRANKLIN PERFORMING ARTS COMPANY$1,000
NEW HAMPSHIRE ARABIAN HORSE ASSOCIATION$100
NEW ENGLAND HORSEMEN'S COUNCIL$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 49% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%GASPARILLA CHARITY HORSE SHOWNATIONAL HORSEMAN: $3k → 11%GREATER BOSTON CHARITY HORSESHOWS: $30k → 7%NEW ENGLAND MORGAN HORSE: $16k → 8%CENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $25k → 10%SEMPER FI AND AMERICA'S FUND: $15k → 11%PETSAVER FOUNDATIONNORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA: $5k → 6%DONTES DEN: $8k → 10%PADRON FAMILY FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%NH HORSE & TRAIL ASSOC: $9k → 5%UPREACH THERAPEUTIC: $7k → 7%LIVE AND LET LIVE FARM: $5k → 7%UNITED PROFESSIONAL HORSEMEN ASSOC BENEVOLENT FUND: $10k → 15%GREATER BOSTON CHARITY HORSESHOWS: $20k → 7%NEW ENGLAND MORGAN HORSE: $10k → 8%CENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $25k → 10%DONTES DEN: $5k → 10%NEW ENGLAND HORSEMEN'S COUNCIL: $100 → 5%UPREACH THERAPEUTIC: $5k → 7%UNITED PROFESSIONAL HORSEMEN ASSOC BENEVOLENT FUND: $10k → 15%GREATER BOSTON CHARITY HORSESHOWS: $15k → 7%NEW ENGLAND MORGAN HORSE: $10k → 8%METHUEN ANIMAL CARE & ADOPTION: $5k → 10%NEW HAMPSHIRE ARABIAN HORSE ASSOCIATION: $100 → 5%TWIN STATE AMERICAN SADDLEBRED ASSOC: $1k → 7%CHAPTER 14 EMERGENCY: $10k → 15%GREATER BOSTON CHARITY HORSESHOWS: $15k → 7%CHALLENGE UNLIMITED: $5k → 10%TWIN STATE AMERICAN SADDLEBRED ASSOC: $815 → 7%AMERICAN HACKNEY HORSE FOUNDATION: $3k → 15%FRANKLIN PERFORMING ARTS COMPANY: $1k → 7%TWIN STATE AMERICAN SADDLEBRED ASSOC: $715 → 7%AMERICAN HACKNEY HORSE FOUNDATION: $3k → 15%AMERICAN HACKNEY HORSE FOUNDATION: $3k → 15%UNITED PROFESSIONAL HORSEMEN ASSOC: $3k → 15%UNITED PROFESSIONAL HORSEMEN ASSOC: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$223k · 9 repeat orgs$68k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2020, 5 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
5

Total granted

$223k
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+7%

Still filing today

11%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
AnimalsHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GB
    GREATER BOSTON CHARITY HORSESHOWS
    4× · 2017–2020 · $80k
  • CENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL OF LAWRENCE INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $50k · revenue +34%
  • NE
    NEW ENGLAND MORGAN HORSE
    3× · 2017–2019 · $35k

Funded once

  • C1
    CHAPTER 14 EMERGENCY
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • PF
    PADRON FAMILY FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -46%
  • LA
    LIVE AND LET LIVE FARM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +55%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
4/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GREATER BOSTON CHARITY HORSESHOWS: $80,000 · OtherGREATER BOSTON CHARITY HORSESHOWSCENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL OF LAWRENCE INC: $50,000 · OtherCENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL OF LAWRENCE INCNEW ENGLAND MORGAN HORSE: $35,275 · OtherNEW ENGLAND MORGAN HORSEUNITED PROFESSIONAL HORSEMEN ASSOC BENEVOLENT FUND: $20,000 · OtherUNITED PROFESSIONAL HORSEMEN ASSOC BENEVOLENT FUNDIndividual grant recipient: $12,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $11,500 · OtherCHAPTER 14 EMERGENCY: $10,000 · OtherNH HORSE & TRAIL ASSOC: $9,000 · Other+9 more: $31,730 · Other+9 moreSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $15,000 · HealthPADRON FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyLIVE AND LET LIVE FARM INC: $5,000 · AnimalsFRANKLIN PERFORMING ARTS COMPANY INC: $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$260,005Health$15,000Philanthropy$10,000Animals$5,000Arts & Culture$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL OF LAWRENCE INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPADRON FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetLIVE AND LET LIVE FARM INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCHALLENGE UNLIMITED INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL OF LAWRENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND ↗
  • Who funds PADRON FAMILY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LIVE AND LET LIVE FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds CHALLENGE UNLIMITED INC ↗
  • Who funds FRANKLIN PERFORMING ARTS COMPANY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Parkman Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Parkman Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 20%
  • Franklin Performing Arts Company Inc: 20% of income from government
  • Central Catholic High School of Lawrence Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Parkman Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph