· Community foundation
Tahoe Community Foundation
The Foundation envisions a thriving community created through meaningful philanthropy, inclusive communication, and the willingness to explore possibilities together.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k16 grants · $108k
- $10k–50k103 grants · $2.1M
- $50k–250k31 grants · $2.4M
- $250k+15 grants · $18M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Riffle Ranch Foundation | $6,500,000 |
| Carnation Farms | $3,260,028 |
| Nevada Museum of Art | $1,962,000 |
| 100 Club of Nevada | $1,576,690 |
| Friends of the Children - South West Washington | $1,000,000 |
| Foundation 36 Inc | $549,000 |
| Classical Tahoe | $397,806 |
| Tahoe Fund | $337,503 |
| Thunderbird Lake Tahoe | $334,550 |
| Truckee Donner Land Trust | $303,000 |
| Keep Memory Alive | $285,000 |
| Friends of the Children Phoenix | $278,600 |
| Boys and Girls Club of Lake Tahoe | $270,000 |
| Western Folklife Center | $250,000 |
| Fighter Country Foundation | $250,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.
189 repeat relationships — 118 still active in FY2024, 71 since wound down; 41 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CFCarnation Farms7× · 2018–2024 · $13M · revenue +56% · 78% of their budget
- NMNevada Museum of Art8× · 2017–2024 · $4.7M · revenue +199%
- TFTAHOE FUND8× · 2017–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +336%
Funded once
- AFAIR FORCE ACADEMY FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue -14%
- TTTHE TURNER FOUNDATION - SINCE 1958graduatedone grant, 2023 · $150k · revenue +203%
- HWHALEAKALA WALDORF SCHOOLone grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +24%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Sierra Fund (TSF) is a non-profit organization with a mission to restore ecosystem and community resiliency in the Sierra Nevada.
The Foundation envisions a thriving community created through meaningful philanthropy, inclusive communication, and the willingness to explore possibilities together.
Sierra watch secures conservation outcomes to protect the natural resources, mountain communities, and timeless values of the tahoe sierra.
The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.
The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…
A membership organization dedicated to developing, promoting, and serving your business and community. Our goal is to sustain a high quality of life by achieving economic vitality, with sensitivity and respect for the environment.
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.
The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.
The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…
To support educational, research and public functions and programs of the riverside campus of the university of california.
The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tahoe Family Solutions Inc and the most unlike its peers is Incline Schools Academic Excellence Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 9. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 35% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 16% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 21% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
403 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 403 of the 458 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Carnation Farms ↗
- Who funds Sierra Nevada College ↗
- Who funds Nevada Museum of Art ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION 36 INC ↗
- Who funds TAHOE FUND ↗
- Who funds THUNDERBIRD LODGE PRESERVATION SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds University of Nevada Reno Foundation ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - SW WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds Lake Tahoe School ↗
- Who funds CLASSICAL TAHOE ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
- Who funds Awaken INC ↗
- Who funds TAHOE FAMILY SOLUTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL CRISIS AID INC ↗
- Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
- Who funds CRISIS INTERVENTION SERVICES DBA SIERRA COMMUNITY HOUSE ↗
- Who funds WILDLIFE IMAGES REHABILITATION & EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds GLENBROOK UNDERGROUND INC ↗
- Who funds CHARLES HUMPHREY KEATING IV FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Eisenhower Medical Center ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - PHOENIX ↗
- Who funds INCLINE VILLAGE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds INCLINE VILLAGE-CRYSTAL BAY VISITOR & CONV BUREAU ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds DIAMOND PEAK SKI EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EXODUS CRY INC ↗
- Who funds Boys & Girls Club of Lake Tahoe ↗
- Who funds TRUCKEE DONNER LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds Safe Harbor Homes and Services ↗
- Who funds HONORHEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SIERRA ARTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AIR FORCE ACADEMY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WESTERN FOLKLIFE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds TREASURE HOUSE ↗
- Who funds FIGHTER COUNTRY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SIMMARON RESEARCH INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Tahoe Truckee Community Foundation · Community Foundation of Northern Nevada · Tahoe Fund · Martis Camp Community Foundation Dba Martis Camp Foundation · NV Energy Charitable Foundation · Offerdahl Family Foundation · The E L Cord Foundation · Thelma B & Thomas P Hart Foundation · Renown Health · Dave & Cheryl Duffield Foundation · The Nell J Redfield Foundation · Peek Family Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Tahoe Community Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Tahoe Community Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Tahoe Community Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.