Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Owen Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$553k
Granted FY2024still arriving
26
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$135k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Youth Development$947kPhilanthropy$274kFood & Nutrition$268kArts & Culture$252kEducation$251kHuman Services$81kHealth$66kRecreation & Sports$54kOther$0
02FY2024 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $126k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $385k
$8,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEART MINISTRY CENTER$135,000
LPIF FOUNDATION$100,000
HOLY NAME SCHOOL$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION$50,000
VITA NOVA MATERNITY COMMUNITY$50,000
AKSARBEN FOUNDATION$33,250
OPERA OMAHA$30,000
CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
FRIENDS OF NEBRASKA PARKS$12,500
ST MARGARET MARY CHURCH$10,000
UNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS$10,000
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$8,000
OMAHA COMMUNITY PLAYHOUSE$5,000
AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $150k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%VITA NOVA MATERNITY COMMUNITY: $50k → 6%LPIF FOUNDATION: $100k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
IA
CA
NE
MO
VA
KS
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 22 repeat orgs$397k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
30

Total granted

$1.9M
$217k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+5%

Still filing today

41%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $180k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HM
    HEART MINISTRY CENTER
    5× · 2020–2024 · $265k · revenue +63%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $104k · revenue +12%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS
    2× · 2021–2024 · $20k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • OF
    OPAS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue -67%
  • BC
    BEMIS CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
One Omaha

One omaha empowers people where they live with education, training, and engagement to develop thriving neighborhoods.

Community Improvement
2
Nebraska Academy of Sciences
Science & Tech
3
Omaha Parks Foundation

The mission of the omaha parks foundation is to improve, promote, preserve, protect, and support omaha's parks and recreation system. we engage in initiatives that make our parks system more accessible, inclusive, and beneficial to all…

Environment
4
Mutual of Omaha Foundation
Philanthropy
5
Omaha Summer Arts Festival Inc

To present a variety of high quality arts programs and exhibits in Omaha for the general public to enjoy and appreciate.

Arts & Culture
6
Greater Omaha Chamber of Commerce

To increase business, employment, and investment in the greater omaha area.

—
7
Omaha Community Foundation

To serve the community by cultivating generosity and strengthening nonprofits.

Philanthropy
8
Share Omaha

Our mission is to help nonprofits fulfill theirs.

Philanthropy
9
Omaha Sports Commission

The mission of the omaha sports commission is to foster a positive socio-economic impact on and a heightened awareness and image of omaha by attracting, hosting, & supporting amateur sporting events.

Recreation & Sports
10
Nebraska Bankers Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to provide support for education, training and career development for banking and related programs. in addition, the foundation will support federally insured depository institutions and the communities in which…

Employment
11
Omaha Economic Development Corporation

The mission of oedc is to implement economic development projects, housing, and community revitalization programs that create jobs, business ownership opportunities and other economic benefits for area residents.

—
12
Omaha Botanical Center Inc

We believe in thoughtful, ecologically-minded practices and the curation of accessible, educational, and inspirational experiences that enhance lives.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Opera Omaha Inc; the most unlike its peers is Corporal Daegan Page Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
14/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF OMAHA INC: $917,500 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF OMAHA INCAKSARBEN FOUNDATION: $147,350 · OtherAKSARBEN FOUNDATIONHOLY NAME SCHOOL: $65,000 · OtherCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Other+45 more: $291,005 · Other+45 moreHEART MINISTRY CENTER: $265,000 · Food & NutritionHEART MINISTR…OPERA OMAHA INC: $110,000 · Arts & CultureOPERA OMAHA…OPAS FOUNDATION: $100,000 · Arts & CultureOPAS FOUNDA…+2 more: $10,000 · Arts & CultureLPIF Foundation: $100,000 · Human ServicesVITA NOVA MATERNITY COMMUNITY: $50,000 · Human ServicesUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $104,000 · EducationTHE JET AWARD FOUNDATION & TRUST: $15,000 · EducationUNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS: $20,000 · PhilanthropyCORPORAL DAEGAN PAGE FOUNDATION: $700 · PhilanthropyOMAHA ZOO FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Animals
Other$1,470,855Food & Nutrition$265,000Arts & Culture$220,000Human Services$150,000Education$119,000Philanthropy$20,700Animals$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEART MINISTRY CENTER: $265,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetOPERA OMAHA INC: $110,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $104,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLPIF Foundation: $100,000 over 1y, 32% of budgetOPAS FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVITA NOVA MATERNITY COMMUNITY: $50,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 326 MID-AMERICA COUNCIL: $19,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JET AWARD FOUNDATION & TRUST: $15,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetFILM STREAMS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJOSLYN ART MUSEUM: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOMAHA ZOO FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOMAHA COMMUNITY PLAYHOUSE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOMAHA PERFORMING ARTS SOCIETY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE MIDLANDS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SIOUXLAND INC: $4,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNEBRASKA STATE FAIR BOARD: $1,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEBRASKA GAME AND PARKS FOUNDATION: $1,555 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF THE MIDLANDS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCORPORAL DAEGAN PAGE FOUNDATION: $700 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSIOUX CENTER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HEART MINISTRY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds OPERA OMAHA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LPIF Foundation ↗
  • Who funds OPAS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VITA NOVA MATERNITY COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS ↗
  • Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 326 MID-AMERICA COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds THE JET AWARD FOUNDATION & TRUST ↗
  • Who funds FILM STREAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds JOSLYN ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds OMAHA ZOO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OMAHA COMMUNITY PLAYHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds OMAHA PERFORMING ARTS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE MIDLANDS ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SIOUXLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA STATE FAIR BOARD ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA GAME AND PARKS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Lozier FoundationNE25.9× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Lozier Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · The Hawks Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · Harley and Beth Schrager Foundation · Peter Kiewit Foundation · Union Pacific Foundation · John K & Lynne D Boyer Foundation · Suzanne & Walter Scott Foundation · The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · Nebraska Community Foundation · Parker Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Owen Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Owen Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Owen Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Owen Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Owen’s filings →

    More from the funding graph