Skip to content

· Private foundation

The O'Neill Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$195k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$307kEducation$189kArts & Culture$167kHousing & Shelter$153kCommunity Improvement$136kHealth$104kYouth Development$79kHuman Services$77kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $106k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$6,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LICKING COUNTY FOUNDATION$60,000
LICKING MEMORIAL HEALTH FOUNDATION$30,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NEWARK$26,000
NEWARK DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS$25,000
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION AND THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY NEWARK$25,000
UNITED WAY OF LICKING COUNTY$7,500
FOOD PANTRY NETWORK OF LICKING COUNTY$6,000
COLUMBUS COUNCIL ON WORLD AFFAIRS$6,000
PELOTONIA$3,500
NEWARK GRANVILLE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$2,500
ST VINCENT HAVEN - ST VINCENT DE PAUL HOUSING FACILITIES INC$1,100
BUCKEYE FAMILY YMCA$1,000
GRANVILLE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%BEGINNING FUTURES 2 INC: $25k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of The O'Neill Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 96% of the giving stays in OH; by stated purpose, 87%.

The O'Neill Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 27 repeat orgs$325k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +61% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
15

Total granted

$1.1M
$324k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
+1%

Still filing today

67%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureInternationalHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ND
    NEWARK DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS
    5× · 2017–2025 · $105k · revenue +755%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - MIDOHIO
    6× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +93%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF COLUMBUS INC
    5× · 2019–2025 · $79k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $222k
  • BF
    Beginning Futures 2 Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +559%
  • TB
    THE BRYN DU COMMISSION
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -54%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greater Cleveland Sports Commission

The mission of the greater cleveland sports commission is to measurably improve the economy of greater cleveland and enrich the community by attracting, creating, managing and enhancing significant sporting and competitive events.

Unclassified
2
Global Cleveland

Global cleveland is dedicated to growing northeast ohio's economy by welcoming and connecting international people to opportunities and fostering a more inviting community for those seeking a place to call home.

Human Services
3
Portage Development Board

To coordinate and promote economic development on a county wide basis among all of the political subdivisions of portage county, ohio.

Public Benefit
4
Greater Columbus Chamber of Commerce

Advancing a thriving central ohio commmunity by serving as a catalyst for all businesses to grow and flourish. our mission pillars are connections, government relations, strategic business solutions and talent/workforce.

—
5
Philanthropy Ohio

To lead and equip ohio philanthropy to be effective partners for change in our communities.

Philanthropy
6
Empowering and Strengthening Ohio's People Inc

Empowering and strengthening ohio's people (esop) helps adults in all stages of life achieve and maintain financial wellness and housing stability.

Housing & Shelter
7
Digitalc

Empower the people of greater cleveland to achieve success through technology, innovation and connected community.

Community Improvement
8
The Northern Cincinnai Foundation

Transforming generosity into impact by encouraging, supporting, and facilitating philanthropy to create more vibrant communities in northern cincinnati.

Philanthropy
9
Cincinnati Usa Regional Chamber Foundation

To develop and promote economic development, talent initiatives and the unique offerings in the cincinnati region.

Community Improvement
10
Fund for Our Economic Future of Northeast Ohio

The fund for our economic future is a creative space for philanthropic funders and civic leaders to explore what matters and implement what works to achieve equitable economic growth, emphasizing systemic, long-term change.

Community Improvement
11
Greater Cleveland Volunteers

Greater cleveland volunteers enriches the community and indivuduals through volunteer service. volunteers age 18 and older are recruited and placed in the agency's programs or referred to local nonprofit or public organizations to help…

Philanthropy
12
Campus Partners for Community Urban Redevelopment

Revitalization of the area immediately adjacent to the ohio state university's main campus in columbus, ohio.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Licking County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Kingdom Pillars. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
21/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $222,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLICKING COUNTY FOUNDATION: $167,500 · OtherLICKING COUNTY FOUNDATIONOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION AND THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY NEWARK: $90,000 · OtherOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION AND THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY NEWARKHABITAT FOR HUMANITY - MIDOHIO: $80,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY - MIDOHIOST VINCENT HAVEN - ST VINCENT DE PAUL HOUSING FACILITIES INC: $71,100 · OtherST VINCENT HAVEN - ST VINCENT DE PAUL HOUSING FACILITIES INCOHIO STATE NEWARK CAMPUS: $65,000 · OtherOHIO STATE NEWARK CAMPUSMIDLAND THEATRE: $40,000 · Other+23 more: $195,500 · Other+23 moreNEWARK CAMPUS DEVELOPMENT FUND: $37,500 · EducationNEWARK CA…NAIOP RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · EducationNAIOP RES…PAR EXCELLENCE LEARNING CENTER: $20,000 · EducationPAR EXCEL…PELOTONIA: $19,000 · EducationPELOTONIADENISON UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · Education+2 more: $5,000 · EducationNEWARK DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS: $105,000 · Community ImprovementBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF COLUMBUS INC: $79,000 · Youth DevelopmentUNITED WAY OF LICKING COUNTY INC: $55,000 · PhilanthropyTHE WORKS - OHIO CENTER FOR HISTORY ART & TECHNOLOGY: $25,000 · Arts & CultureNEWARK SPORT & EVENT COMMISSION: $20,000 · Arts & CultureNEWARK-GRANVILLE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $5,500 · Arts & CultureLICKING MEMORIAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $45,000 · Health
Other$931,100Education$116,500Community Improvement$105,000Youth Development$79,000Philanthropy$55,000Arts & Culture$50,500Health$45,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEWARK DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS: $105,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY - MIDOHIO: $80,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF COLUMBUS INC: $79,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED WAY OF LICKING COUNTY INC: $55,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetLICKING MEMORIAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNEWARK CAMPUS DEVELOPMENT FUND: $37,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetNAIOP RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetTHE COLUMBUS COUNCIL ON WORLD AFFAI: $25,500 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetTHE WORKS - OHIO CENTER FOR HISTORY ART & TECHNOLOGY: $25,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBeginning Futures 2 Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetTHE BRYN DU COMMISSION: $25,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF LICKING COUNTY: $24,500 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetNEWARK SPORT & EVENT COMMISSION: $20,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetPAR EXCELLENCE LEARNING CENTER: $20,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetPELOTONIA: $19,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR DISABILITY SERVICES: $15,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE FOOD PANTRY NETWORK OF LICKING COUNTY: $13,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetKINGDOM PILLARS: $6,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetNEWARK-GRANVILLE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $5,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS OHIO INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDENISON UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRANVILLE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetGranville Athletic Boosters: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGRANVILLE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetLICKING COUNTY COALITION FOR HOUSING INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEWARK ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEWARK DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - MIDOHIO ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF COLUMBUS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF LICKING COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds LICKING MEMORIAL HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEWARK CAMPUS DEVELOPMENT FUND ↗
  • Who funds NAIOP RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COLUMBUS COUNCIL ON WORLD AFFAI ↗
  • Who funds THE WORKS - OHIO CENTER FOR HISTORY ART & TECHNOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds Beginning Futures 2 Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE BRYN DU COMMISSION ↗
  • Who funds MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF LICKING COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds NEWARK SPORT & EVENT COMMISSION ↗
  • Who funds PAR EXCELLENCE LEARNING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PELOTONIA ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR DISABILITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds THE FOOD PANTRY NETWORK OF LICKING COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds KINGDOM PILLARS ↗
  • Who funds NEWARK-GRANVILLE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS OHIO INC ↗
  • Who funds DENISON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds GRANVILLE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Granville Athletic Boosters ↗
  • Who funds GRANVILLE EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LICKING COUNTY COALITION FOR HOUSING INC ↗
  • Who funds NEWARK ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Licking County Foundation IncOH40.9× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Licking County Foundation Inc · The Lindorf Family Foundation · Park National Corporation Foundation · First Federal Foundation · The John and Mary Alford Foundation · Licking Memorial Health Foundation · The Patricia R and Herbert J Murphy Foundation · The Englefield Foundation · Energy Cooperative Roundup Foundation Inc · Columbus Foundation · The Lefevre Foundation · The Gilbert Reese Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The O'Neill Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The O'Neill Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The O'Neill Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The O'Neill Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on O'Neill’s filings →

    More from the funding graph