Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Noble Fir Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.7M
Granted FY2023
2
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$3.7M
Largest
01What you fund
0182% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Philanthropy$3.7MEnvironment$107kEducation$93kHuman Services$61kArts & Culture$53kHealth$52kHousing & Shelter$30kInternational$15kOther$0
02FY2023 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $250k+1 grant · $3.7M
$3,689,463
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WILLIAM TRAVIS PENN AND JOHN WICHER CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$3,689,463
THE SEATTLE REPERTORY THEATRE FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $41k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SOUND GENERATIONS: $10k → 9%SOUND GENERATIONS: $8k → 9%SOUND GENERATIONS: $8k → 9%SOUND GENERATIONS: $6k → 9%SOUND GENERATIONS: $5k → 9%SOUND GENERATIONS: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
WA
OR
CA
VA
AZ
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

10%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$403k · 15 repeat orgs$3.8M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +73% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2023, 15 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
7

Total granted

$403k
$66k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+73%
+17%

Still filing today

73%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Arts & CulturePhilanthropyEducationEnvironmentHuman ServicesInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    WHIDBEY CAMANO LAND TRUST
    5× · 2017–2022 · $85k · revenue +139%
  • B
    BREAKTHROUGH
    2× · 2021–2022 · $60k · revenue +73%
  • SG
    SOUND GENERATIONS
    6× · 2017–2022 · $41k · revenue +88%

Funded once

  • BH
    Baylor Health Care System Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $30k · revenue +44%
  • BT
    BREAK THROUGH CENTRAL TX
    one grant, 2019 · $20k
  • SV
    SOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS
    one grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue -76%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fsc I&P

Fsc i&p promotes environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world's forests. this mission aligns with the forest stewardship council (fsc), its network of offices, and other organizations.…

Philanthropy
2
Great Peninsula Conservancy

Preserve in perpetuity the natural habitats, rural landscapes, and open spaces of the great peninsula of washington's puget sound.

Environment
3
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

4
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
5
Friends of Kexp

Kexp's mission is to enrich your life by championing music and discovery.

Youth Development
6
Life Science Washington

Life science washington is a non-profit trade and professional association dedicated to promoting innovation and responsible growth in the life sciences and biomedical industries in the state of washington. promotion and education are…

7
Humanities Washington

Humanities washington (hw) opens minds and bridges divides by creating spaces to explore different perspectives. we envision a state where all people seek a deeper understanding of others, themselves, and the human experience, in order to…

Arts & Culture
8
Puget Sound Restoration Fund

To restore habitat, water quality and native species in the puget sound

Environment
9
Aquarium of the Pacific Corporation

The aquarium of the pacific's mission is to instill a sense of wonder, respect, and stewardship for the pacific ocean, its inhabitants, and ecosystems.

Animals
10
Whatcom Land Trust

The mission of the Whatcom Land Trust is to preserve and protect wildlife habitat, scenic, agricultural and open space lands in Whatcom County for future generations by securing interests in land and promoting land stewardship.

Environment
11
Western Healthconnect

Support significant improvements in health care delivery and outcomes within the context of nonprofit, charitable ownership.

Health
12
Terraset

Terraset uses philanthropic capital to purchase permanent, high-quality carbon removal. we pool donations from individuals, foundations, family offices, and donor advised funds, and make strategic purchases of high-quality carbon removal…

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cascade Public Media and the most unlike its peers is Baylor Health Care System Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
14/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WILLIAM TRAVIS PENN AND JOHN WICHER CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $3,689,463 · OtherWILLIAM TRAVIS PENN AND JOHN WICHER CHARITABLE FOUNDATION+14 more — $172,500 · OtherBREAKTHROUGH — $60,000 · EducationAUSTIN COLLEGE — $30,000 · EducationWHIDBEY CAMANO LAND TRUST — $85,000 · EnvironmentKUOW PUGET SOUND PUBLIC RADIO — $28,500 · Arts & CultureSEATTLE REPERTORY THEATER FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Arts & CultureCASCADE PUBLIC MEDIA — $8,000 · Arts & CultureHISTORIC WHIDBEY — $2,000 · Arts & CultureSOUND GENERATIONS — $41,000 · Human ServicesPLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES — $30,000 · Housing & ShelterBaylor Health Care System Foundation — $30,000 · Health
Other$3,861,963Education$90,000Environment$85,000Arts & Culture$48,500Human Services$41,000Housing & Shelter$30,000Health$30,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWHIDBEY CAMANO LAND TRUST — $85,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH — $60,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSOUND GENERATIONS — $41,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES — $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAUSTIN COLLEGE — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBaylor Health Care System Foundation — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKUOW PUGET SOUND PUBLIC RADIO — $28,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $18,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Corps — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM — $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE REPERTORY THEATER FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCASCADE PUBLIC MEDIA — $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS — $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetONE TREE PLANTED INC — $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPRATHAM USA — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHISTORIC WHIDBEY — $2,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WHIDBEY CAMANO LAND TRUST
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH
  • Who funds SOUND GENERATIONS
  • Who funds PLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES
  • Who funds AUSTIN COLLEGE
  • Who funds Baylor Health Care System Foundation
  • Who funds KUOW PUGET SOUND PUBLIC RADIO
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds Mercy Corps
  • Who funds NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM
  • Who funds SEATTLE REPERTORY THEATER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CASCADE PUBLIC MEDIA
  • Who funds SOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS
  • Who funds ONE TREE PLANTED INC
  • Who funds PRATHAM USA
  • Who funds HISTORIC WHIDBEY

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Noble Fir Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 47%
  • Mercy Corps47% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph