Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Noah-Atiba Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$70k
Granted FY2020
10
Grants FY2020
6
States reached
$14k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

54% of The Noah-Atiba Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Brown University, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 2 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year The Noah-Atiba Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $70k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

6
’17
5
’18
7
’19
6
’20
2
’21
5
’22
4
’23
2
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$438kReligion$62kHealth$51kCivil Rights$49kYouth Development$16kInternational$11kHuman Services$6kArts & Culture$3kOther$0
02FY2020 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k8 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $26k
$8,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BROWN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL SCHOOL$13,583
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$12,000
BROWN UNIVERSITY$8,000
PHILLIPS ACADEMY$8,000
UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI$8,000
SACRED HEART CHURCH$6,200
CALIFORNIA EBU PROGRESSIVE UNION$5,000
J CRUZ FOUNDATION$3,000
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH$3,000
THE CULTURE PROJECT$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EXCEPTIONAL PARENTS UNLIMITED: $2k → 19%EXCEPTIONAL PARENTS UNLIMITED: $2k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
MA
NV
PA
RI
CA
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$278k · 9 repeat orgs$96k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against -78% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2020, 2 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
8

Total granted

$278k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
-78%

Still filing today

44%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationInternationalArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TRUSTEES OF PHILLIPS ACADEMY
    7× · 2017–2023 · $77k · revenue +23%
  • UO
    University of Miami
    6× · 2017–2024 · $70k · revenue +96%
  • TC
    The Culture Project International
    3× · 2019–2022 · $16k · revenue +140%

Funded once

  • UI
    UGBAJO ITSEKIRI USA INC
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -78%
  • BO
    Bridge of Hope Foundation
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue -81%
  • AD
    ANIOCHA-OSHIMILI DAUGHTERS OF SOCAL
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
3
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
4
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
5
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
6
University of Saint Joseph

The university provides a rigorous liberal arts and professional education for a diverse student population. (see schedule o for the organization's mission.)

Education
7
Marshall B Ketchum University

To educate caring, inspired health care professionals who are prepared to deliver collaborative, patient-centric health care in an interprofessional environment.

Education
8
St Catherine University

We educate women to lead and influence. we educate at all degree levels through valuing and integrating the liberal arts and professional education within the catholic intellectual tradition, see schedule oemphasizing scholarly inquiry and…

Education
9
University of Providence

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

Education
10
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
11
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
12
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Brown University; the most unlike its peers is Bridge of Hope Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $119,219 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JU…TRUSTEES OF PHILLIPS ACADEMY: $77,345 · EducationTRUSTEES OF PHILLIPS ACADEMYUniversity of Miami: $70,388 · EducationUniversity of MiamiCALIFORNIA EBU PROGRESSIVE UNION: $35,000 · OtherCALIFORNIA EBU PROGRESSIVE U…UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA: $25,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDAFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH: $19,100 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCHAKWA-IBOM SOCIETY: $15,000 · OtherAKWA-IBOM SOCIETYBROWN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL SCHOOL: $13,583 · OtherBROWN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL SCH…OKPE UNION OF NORTH AMERICA: $13,500 · OtherOKPE UNION OF NORTH AMERICARESURRECTION CATHOLIC CHURCH: $10,920 · OtherRESURRECTION CATHOLIC CHURCHSACRED HEART CHURCH: $8,300 · Other+10 more: $18,000 · Other+10 moreBROWN UNIVERSITY: $146,400 · Community ImprovementBROWN UNIVERSITYJ CRUZ FOUNDATION: $34,500 · InternationalThe Culture Project International: $15,600 · Youth DevelopmentUGBAJO ITSEKIRI USA INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureEXCEPTIONAL PARENTS UNLIMITED INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesBridge of Hope Foundation: $3,000 · Health
Education$266,952Other$158,403Community Improvement$146,400International$34,500Youth Development$15,600Arts & Culture$10,000Human Services$4,000Health$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $146,400 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $119,219 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF PHILLIPS ACADEMY: $77,345 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $70,388 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJ CRUZ FOUNDATION: $34,500 over 6y, 79% of budgetThe Culture Project International: $15,600 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetUGBAJO ITSEKIRI USA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetEXCEPTIONAL PARENTS UNLIMITED INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBridge of Hope Foundation: $3,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF PHILLIPS ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds University of Miami ↗
  • Who funds J CRUZ FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Culture Project International ↗
  • Who funds UGBAJO ITSEKIRI USA INC ↗
  • Who funds EXCEPTIONAL PARENTS UNLIMITED INC ↗
  • Who funds Bridge of Hope Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Noah-Atiba Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Noah-Atiba Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Noah-Atiba’s filings →

More from the funding graph