Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Nick and Leslie Hanauer Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$570k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$2.6MEmployment$2.6MEducation$2.3MHuman Services$1.3MHealth$1.1MSocial Science$1.0MRecreation & Sports$1.0MCivil Rights$730kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $140k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $430k
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Media Matters for America$150,000
Individual grant recipient$115,000
Royal Albert Hall America Inc$100,000
ECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE$65,000
Capital and Main$25,000
WASHINGTON STATE BUDGET AND POLICY CENTER$25,000
National Employment Law Project$25,000
The American Prospect Inc$25,000
CLIMATE SOLUTIONS$25,000
The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation$14,879
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Children In Conflict: $50k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
WI
NY
MA
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.9M · 25 repeat orgs$5.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
39

Total granted

$8.9M
$5.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+25%

Still filing today

84%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyCivil RightsPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WI
    WORKMONEY INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $1.3M · revenue +441%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF SEATTLE WATERFRONT
    3× · 2017–2019 · $1.0M · revenue +108%
  • EP
    ECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $480k · revenue +261%

Funded once

  • SA
    SEATTLE ACADEMY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES - ANNUAL FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $830k
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY
    one grant, 2020 · $750k · revenue -38%
  • SC
    Seattle Children's Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $500k · revenue +190%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—
2
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
3
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
4
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
5
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
6
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
7
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
8
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
9
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
10
Washington Area Community Investment Fund Inc

The washington area community investment fund (wacif) is a nonprofit community loan fund focused on increasing equity and economic opportunity in the washington, dc area's underserved communities. wacif's mission is driven is driven by…

—
11
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
12
Pro Publica Inc

Pro publica is an independent, non-profit, pulitzer prize-winning newsroom that produces investigative journalism in the public interest. our work focuses exclusively on truly important stories. [see continuation on schedule o] we produce…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Rprime Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
53/54
Grantees still filing
40/54
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WORKMONEY INC: $1,250,000 · OtherWORKMONEY INCSEATTLE ACADEMY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES - ANNUAL FUND: $830,000 · OtherSEATTLE ACADEMY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES - ANNUAL FUNDUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $800,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONIndividual grant recipient: $735,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSeattle Children's Foundation: $500,000 · OtherSeattle Children's FoundationTIDES CENTER RAISE WAGES NOW PROJECT: $500,000 · OtherTIDES CENTER RAISE WAGES NOW PROJECTSEATTLE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $500,000 · OtherSEATTLE CHILDRENS HOSPITALUNITED WAY: $380,801 · OtherNew Venture Fund LP: $350,000 · OtherNational Employment Law Project: $290,000 · Other+35 more: $2,028,881 · Other+35 moreSEATTLE FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 · PhilanthropySEATTLE FOUNDAT…UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY: $750,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF K…Washington Progress Fund: $300,000 · PhilanthropyWashington Prog…+4 more: $151,879 · Philanthropy+4 moreFair Work Center: $2,000,000 · EmploymentFair Work Cent…FRIENDS OF SEATTLE WATERFRONT: $1,002,060 · Community ImprovementAMERICAN ECONOMIC LIBERTIES PROJECT: $50,000 · Community ImprovementROOSEVELT FORWARD INC: $50,000 · Community Improvement+1 more: $25,000 · Community ImprovementCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $270,000 · EducationMEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA: $165,000 · EducationTHE ROOSEVELT INSTITUTE: $140,000 · EducationTHE SEATTLE ACADEMY OF ARTS & SCIENCES: $99,800 · EducationPROTEUS FUND INC: $50,000 · EducationAlliance for Education: $30,000 · Education+4 more: $51,840 · EducationECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE: $480,000 · Social ScienceJUST CAPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $250,000 · Social ScienceThe Rand Corporation: $500,000 · Public BenefitTHE WASHINGTON STATE BUDGET AND POLICY CENTER: $125,000 · Public Benefit+1 more: $5,000 · Public Benefit
Other$8,164,682Philanthropy$2,201,879Employment$2,000,000Community Improvement$1,127,060Education$806,640Social Science$730,000Public Benefit$630,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFair Work Center: $2,000,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetWORKMONEY INC: $1,250,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF SEATTLE WATERFRONT: $1,002,060 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetSEATTLE FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY: $750,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSeattle Children's Foundation: $500,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetThe Rand Corporation: $500,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE: $480,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetWashington Progress Fund: $300,000 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $270,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATION: $266,484 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetJUST CAPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $250,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetCLIMATE SOLUTIONS: $200,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetLeague of Education Voters: $180,000 over 3y, 71% of budgetCENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS: $180,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFORTERRA NW: $173,750 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetMEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA: $165,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetTHE ROOSEVELT INSTITUTE: $140,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetROYAL ALBERT HALL AMERICA INC: $130,047 over 2y, 45% of budgetTHE WASHINGTON STATE BUDGET AND POLICY CENTER: $125,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetTHE AMERICAN PROSPECT INC: $105,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetTHE SEATTLE ACADEMY OF ARTS & SCIENCES: $99,800 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetORCAS ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $62,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWorking Washington: $60,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetPROTEUS FUND INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN IN CONFLICT INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetAMERICAN ECONOMIC LIBERTIES PROJECT: $50,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetROOSEVELT FORWARD INC: $50,000 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetHOPEWELL FUND: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTROUT UNLIMITED INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA FE INSTITUTE: $40,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $35,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAlliance for Education: $30,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetAncient Egypt Research Associates Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetEconomic Opportunity Institute: $25,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL & MAIN: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetEL DORADO FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetWELD SEATTLE: $25,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetAmerican Compass Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $16,840 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CITY CLUB: $15,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WILLIAM & FLORA HEWLETT FOUNDATION: $14,879 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFUNDACION TELETON USA: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCODEORG: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Fair Work Center ↗
  • Who funds WORKMONEY INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF SEATTLE WATERFRONT ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Seattle Children's Foundation ↗
  • Who funds The Rand Corporation ↗
  • Who funds ECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Washington Progress Fund ↗
  • Who funds CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JUST CAPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CLIMATE SOLUTIONS ↗
  • Who funds League of Education Voters ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS ↗
  • Who funds FORTERRA NW ↗
  • Who funds MEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds THE ROOSEVELT INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds ROYAL ALBERT HALL AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WASHINGTON STATE BUDGET AND POLICY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN PROSPECT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SEATTLE ACADEMY OF ARTS & SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds ORCAS ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Working Washington ↗
  • Who funds PROTEUS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN IN CONFLICT INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ECONOMIC LIBERTIES PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds ROOSEVELT FORWARD INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPEWELL FUND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationWA28.3× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Gates Foundation · The Satterberg Foundation Inc · The GreerSolien Fund · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Impactassetsinc · New Venture Fund · Ridge Road Foundation · Stolte Family Foundation · Hopewell Fund · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The Ford Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Nick and Leslie Hanauer Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Nick and Leslie Hanauer Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Nick and Leslie Hanauer Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Nick and Leslie Hanauer Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 72 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Nick and Leslie Hanauer’s filings →

    More from the funding graph