Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Nicholson Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$984k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$12MArts & Culture$5.1MEducation$2.1MHuman Services$1.1MPublic Benefit$406kCommunity Improvement$204kYouth Development$180kCivil Rights$127kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k4 grants · $484k
  • $250k+1 grant · $500k
$144,348
Median grant
4
States reached
$8.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GLASSROOTS INC$500,000
METAL MUSEUM$190,000
GLASSROOTS INC$144,348
THE BUTTERFLY EFFECT PROJECT$100,000
PECONIC ARTS SCHOOL OF FINE CRAFTS$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%GREATER BERGEN COMMUNITY ACTION INC #193155: $47k → 7%GREATER BERGEN COMMUNITY ACTION INC 193155: $18k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
TN
NC
DC
LA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$15M · 47 repeat orgs$6.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

47 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 46 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

47
58

Total granted

$15M
$5.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+17%

Still filing today

11%
16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $340k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesArts & CultureEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GLASSROOTS INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +66% · 58% of their budget
  • VISUAL ARTS CENTER OF NEW JERSEY
    2× · 2020–2023 · $1.0M · revenue +41% · 25% of their budget
  • MF
    METROPOLITAN FAMILY HEALTH NETWORK
    2× · 2020–2021 · $236k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • PA
    POCOSIN ARTS INC 21NC211
    one grant, 2021 · $500k
  • AA
    AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS
    one grant, 2020 · $400k · revenue +17%
  • SN
    SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY PERINATAL COOPERATIVEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $360k · revenue +51%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Jersey Innovation Institute Inc

We are an innovative research org. dedicated to revitalizing economic development within nj.

Science & Tech
2
New Jersey Education Association

The mission of the new jersey education association is to advance and protect the rights, benefits, and interests of members, and promote a quality system of public education for all students.

—
3
Healthcare Institute of New Jersey Inc

To provide advocacy, research, analysis, communication and publication of information concerning healthcare products, r & d, their manufacture and marketing as they pertain to new jersey's pharmaceutical and medical technology industry.

—
4
Jfk Medical Associates Pa

Jfk medical associates, p.a. is committed to excellence in providing quality and compassionate healthcare services to diverse communities.

Health
5
Public Media Nj Inc

To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse

Arts & Culture
6
Humc Cardiovascular Partners Pc

The organization provides high quality medical care to the community that it serves and specifically provides cardiology & related professional medical services in conjunction with hmh hospitals corp.

Health
7
New Jersey State Nurses Association

Work for the improvement of health standards and the availability of healthcare services for all people; foster high standards of nursing; stimulate and promote the professional development of nurses; advance the economic and general…

—
8
New Jersey Association of Nurse Anesthetists

New jersey association of nurse anesthetists (the organization) is a non-profit organization that facilitates the cooperation between nurse anesthetists and the medical profession, hospitals and other agencies interested in anesthesia and…

—
9
New Jersey Psychiatric Association

The mission of the new jersey psychiatric association is to serve its members' professional practice needs, including delivering essential practice management tools and continuing education programs; fostering physician wellness as the…

—
10
Georgian Court University

Georgian court university (gcu), provides a comprehensive liberal arts education and is open to students of all faiths, delivers a curriculum that promotes scholarship, service, and personal development.

Education
11
New Jersey Manufacturing Extension Program Incorporated

Strengthen manufacturers competitiveness by enhancing productivity, performance and profitability. as a trusted advisor to new jersey manufacturers, we leverage our staff and resources to help identify areas of improvement and streamline…

Community Improvement
12
Seton Hall University

Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Visual Arts Center of New Jersey; the most unlike its peers is National Ornamental Metal Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 108 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE ARTSCENTER 19NC1031: $1,600,000 · OtherTHE ARTSCENTER 19NC1031RUTGERS UNIVERSITY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CARE 194213: $1,353,981 · OtherRUTGERS UNIVERSITY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CARE 194213RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION-RWJMS #204116: $1,172,005 · OtherRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION-RWJMS #204116VISUAL ARTS CENTER OF NEW JERSEY: $1,027,813 · OtherVISUAL ARTS CENTER OF NEW JERSEYPREFERRED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH GROUP #195227: $883,505 · OtherST JOSEPH'S HEALTH 1921111: $650,687 · OtherNJ HEALTH CARE QUALITY INSTITUTE #18598: $623,086 · Other+88 more: $10,897,911 · Other+88 moreGLASSROOTS INC: $1,101,715 · Youth DevelopmentTHE BUTTERFLY EFFECT PROJECT INC: $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentAMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS: $399,800 · HealthSOUTHERN NEW JERSEY PERINATAL COOPERATIVE: $359,992 · HealthMETROPOLITAN FAMILY HEALTH NETWORK: $235,639 · HealthGreater Newark Health Care Coalition: $84,375 · HealthCENTER FOR HEALTH CARE STRATEGIES INC: $42,680 · HealthNATIONAL ORNAMENTAL METAL MUSEUM INC: $190,000 · Arts & CultureRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $82,253 · EducationFOUNDATION FOR EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION INC: $66,776 · EducationFairleigh Dickinson University: $28,200 · EducationGREATER BERGEN COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $65,000 · Human ServicesHAW RIVER ASSEMBLY INC: $40,000 · Environment
Other$18,208,988Youth Development$1,201,715Health$1,122,486Arts & Culture$190,000Education$177,229Human Services$65,000Environment$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGLASSROOTS INC: $1,101,715 over 5y, 58% of budgetVISUAL ARTS CENTER OF NEW JERSEY: $1,027,813 over 2y, 25% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS: $399,800 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTHERN NEW JERSEY PERINATAL COOPERATIVE: $359,992 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetMETROPOLITAN FAMILY HEALTH NETWORK: $235,639 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetNATIONAL ORNAMENTAL METAL MUSEUM INC: $190,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetTHE BUTTERFLY EFFECT PROJECT INC: $100,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetGreater Newark Health Care Coalition: $84,375 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $82,253 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION INC: $66,776 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetGREATER BERGEN COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $65,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSOUND JUSTICE INITIATIVE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 60% of budgetCENTER FOR HEALTH CARE STRATEGIES INC: $42,680 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHAW RIVER ASSEMBLY INC: $40,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetFairleigh Dickinson University: $28,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew Jersey Association for the Education of Young Children: $6,179 over 1y, 4.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GLASSROOTS INC ↗
  • Who funds VISUAL ARTS CENTER OF NEW JERSEY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY PERINATAL COOPERATIVE ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN FAMILY HEALTH NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ORNAMENTAL METAL MUSEUM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of New JerseyNJ14.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of New Jersey · Henry & Marilyn Taub Foundation · The Burke Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Nicholson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Nicholson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Greater Bergen Community Action Inc: 62% of income from government
  • Metropolitan Family Health Network: 31% of income from government
  • Center for Health Care Strategies Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Glassroots Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Fairleigh Dickinson University: 2% of income from government
  • Rutgers University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Nicholson Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Nicholson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 108 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Nicholson’s filings →

More from the funding graph