Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Nicholas Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$50kHuman Services$50kEducation$19kPhilanthropy$13kHousing & Shelter$12kYouth Development$10kCommunity Improvement$6kInternational$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$523k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN$5,000
MAYO FOUNDATION$4,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS$4,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
SAFE HOUSE$2,000
FAMILY PROMISE$2,000
DOUBLE H HOLE IN THE WOODS RANCH$2,000
SAFE NEST SHELTER$2,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA INC$2,000
SALVATION ARMY CLARK CITY$1,000
SOUTHERN NEVADA MOUNTAIN BIKE ASSOCIATIO$1,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LAS VEGAS$1,000
SHADE TREE SHELTER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ANDRE AGASSI FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATIO: $1k → 13%SAFE NEST SHELTER: $3k → 13%SAFE NEST SHELTER: $2k → 13%SAFE NEST SHELTER: $2k → 13%SAFE NEST SHELTER: $2k → 13%SAFE NEST SHELTER: $1k → 13%SAFE NEST SHELTER: $2k → 13%SAFE NEST SHELTER: $1k → 13%SAFE HOUSE: $2k → 13%SAFE HOUSE: $2k → 13%SAFE HOUSE: $2k → 13%SAFE HOUSE: $2k → 13%SAFE HOUSE: $2k → 13%SAFE HOUSE: $2k → 13%SAFE HOUSE: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
NV
OH
MD
AZ
NC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$189k · 17 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
1

Total granted

$189k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+209%

Still filing today

41%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesRecreation & SportsEducationHealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
    7× · 2019–2025 · $19k · revenue +126%
  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $13k · revenue +392%
  • SH
    SAFE HOUSE INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $13k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • AA
    ANDRE AGASSI FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +209%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tahoe Nordic Search & Rescue Inc

The tahoe nordic search and rescue team (tnsar) ... was conceived in 1976 as a response to the death of a boy lost off the back side of northstar-at-tahoe ski area during a blizzard. there was, at the time, no organized backcountry team to…

—
2
Safehouse Denver Inc

Safehouse denver assists adult, children, and youth in reclaiming their right to a life free from domestic violence. the agency provides a broad spectrum of culturally competent, trauma-informed services, including but not limited to,…

Human Services
3
National Science and Technology Medals Foundation Inc

The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…

—
4
Asmc Foundation
Education
5
Mount St Vincent Home Inc

As part of intermountain health, mount saint vincent partners with children and families to heal beyond trauma into a healthy and hopeful future.

—
6
The Alexander Schneider Foundation
—
7
Safehouse Progressive Alliance for Nonviolence Inc

To provide safe shelter, support and advocacy for adults and their children, and to provide an end to violence against adults, youth and children through support, advocacy and community organizing.

Human Services
8
The Shade Tree Inc

The shade tree, inc. (organization), a nevada nonprofit corporation, provides temporary shelter for homeless and abused women and children in crisis and offers life-changing services promoting stability, dignity, and self reliance. the…

—
9
Simon Estes Foundation
Education
10
American Society for Dermatologic Surgery Association

To promote the educational and professional interests of dermatologic surgeons, to provide a vehicle for advocacy and public education efforts on behalf of dermatologic surgeons and their patients, and to address socio-economic issues that…

Community Improvement
11
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
12
Semler Institute for Stress Management Research and Education
Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Stephen Siller Tunnel to Towers Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Andre Agassi Foundation for Education. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $27,650 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPROJECT PREVENTION: $13,775 · OtherPROJECT PREVENTIONMAYO FOUNDATION: $13,125 · OtherMAYO FOUNDATIONFAMILY PROMISE: $12,900 · OtherFAMILY PROMISESALVATION ARMY CLARK CITY: $12,275 · OtherSALVATION ARMY CLARK CITYSHADE TREE SHELTER: $11,900 · OtherSHADE TREE SHELTERBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LAS: $7,500 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LASDOCTORS WITHOUT BOARDERS USA INC: $7,000 · OtherDOCTORS WITHOUT BOARDERS USA INCCITY MISSION OF LAS VEGAS: $5,750 · Other+1 more: $2,025 · OtherSAFE HOUSE INC: $12,900 · Human ServicesSAFE HOUSE INCSAFE NESTTEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR: $11,625 · Human ServicesSAFE NESTTEMPOR…ANDRE AGASSI FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION: $1,000 · Human ServicesSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $18,900 · HealthSHRINERS HO…STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $13,400 · EducationSTEPHEN SI…National Merit Scholarship Corporation: $5,000 · EducationNational M…DOUBLE H HOLE IN THE WOODS RANCH INC: $10,525 · Recreation & SportsSouthern Nevada Mountain Bike Assoc: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $2,750 · International
Other$113,900Human Services$25,525Health$18,900Education$18,400Recreation & Sports$11,525International$2,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $18,900 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $13,400 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSAFE HOUSE INC: $12,900 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSAFE NESTTEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR: $11,625 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetDOUBLE H HOLE IN THE WOODS RANCH INC: $10,525 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNational Merit Scholarship Corporation: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $2,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANDRE AGASSI FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSouthern Nevada Mountain Bike Assoc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAFE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFE NESTTEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR ↗
  • Who funds DOUBLE H HOLE IN THE WOODS RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds National Merit Scholarship Corporation ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds ANDRE AGASSI FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds Southern Nevada Mountain Bike Assoc ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Nicholas Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Nicholas Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Nicholas’ filings →

More from the funding graph