Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Nicholas Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$113k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$271kEducation$148kCommunity Improvement$142kHealth$133kArts & Culture$128kReligion$73kAnimals$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $103k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FULTON CTY REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$15,405
GLOVERSVILLE THEATRE CORPORATION$15,405
GLOVERSVILLE LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC$14,378
FULTON COUNTY YMCA$14,378
MOUNTAIN VALLEY HOSPICE$14,378
SENIOR CITIZEN SERVICE CENTER$14,378
Individual grant recipient$14,378
TRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCH$2,000
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$1,000
TWIN CITIES COUNCIL OF CHURCHES$1,000
EDINBURG BIBLE CHURCH$1,000
CHURCH OF THE HOLY SPIRIT$1,000
JAMES A BRENNAN MEMORIAL HUMANE$1,000
WESLEYAN CHURCH$500
SALVATION ARMY$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FULTON COUNTY YMCA: $17k → 13%FULTON COUNTY YMCA: $16k → 13%FULTON COUNTY YMCA: $15k → 13%FULTON COUNTY YMCA: $14k → 13%FULTON COUNTY YMCA: $14k → 13%FULTON COUNTY YMCA: $14k → 13%GLOVERSVILLE LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $29k → 13%GLOVERSVILLE THEATRE CORPORATION: $18k → 13%FULTON CTY REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $18k → 13%FULTON CTY REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $18k → 13%GLOVERSVILLE LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $18k → 13%GLOVERSVILLE THEATRE CORPORATION: $18k → 13%SENIOR CITIZEN SERVICE CENTER: $18k → 13%GLOVERSVILLE THEATRE CORPORATION: $17k → 13%FULTON CTY REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $17k → 13%GLOVERSVILLE LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $17k → 13%MOUNTAIN VALLEY HOSPICE: $17k → 13%SENIOR CITIZEN SERVICE CENTER: $17k → 13%MOUNTAIN VALLEY HOSPICE: $17k → 13%FULTON COUNTY YMCA: $17k → 13%MOUNTAIN VALLEY HOSPICE: $16k → 13%SENIOR CITIZEN SERVICE CENTER: $16k → 13%GLOVERSVILLE BRANCH YMCA: $16k → 13%GLOVERSVILLE LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $16k → 13%FULTON CTY REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $16k → 13%FULTON CTY REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $15k → 13%GLOVERSVILLE THEATRE CORPORATION: $15k → 13%FULTON CTY REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $15k → 13%GLOVERSVILLE THEATRE CORPORATION: $15k → 13%SENIOR CITIZEN SERVICE CENTER: $15k → 13%MOUNTAIN VALLEY HOSPICE: $15k → 13%FULTON CTY REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $15k → 13%GLOVERSVILLE THEATRE CORPORATION: $15k → 13%GLOVERSVILLE LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $14k → 13%SENIOR CITIZEN SERVICE CENTER: $14k → 13%GLOVERSVILLE BRANCH YMCA: $14k → 13%MOUNTAIN VALLEY HOSPICE: $14k → 13%FULTON CTY REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $14k → 13%GLOVERSVILLE THEATRE CORPORATION: $14k → 13%SENIOR CITIZEN SERVICE CENTER: $14k → 13%MOUNTAIN VALLEY HOSPICE: $14k → 13%GLOVERSVILLE LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $14k → 13%GLOVERSVILLE BRANCH YMCA: $14k → 13%FULTON CTY REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $14k → 13%GLOVERSVILLE THEATRE CORPORATION: $14k → 13%MOUNTAIN VALLEY HOSPICE: $14k → 13%GLOVERSVILLE BRANCH YMCA: $14k → 13%SENIOR CITIZEN SERVICE CENTER: $14k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$987k · 22 repeat orgs$500 to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
1

Total granted

$987k
$500

Still filing today

18%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyArts & CultureAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GL
    GLOVERSVILLE LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $148k · revenue -70%
  • FC
    FULTON CTY REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $142k
  • SC
    SENIOR CITIZEN SERVICE CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $134k

Funded once

  • CO
    Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day
    one grant, 2025 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
2/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FULTON CTY REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $142,115 · OtherFULTON CTY REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCESENIOR CITIZEN SERVICE CENTER: $133,728 · OtherSENIOR CITIZEN SERVICE CENTERMOUNTAIN VALLEY HOSPICE: $132,686 · OtherMOUNTAIN VALLEY HOSPICETHE FULTON COUNTY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $132,686 · OtherTHE FULTON COUNTY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INCIndividual grant recipient: $84,186 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+15 more: $77,500 · Other+15 moreGLOVERSVILLE LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $147,905 · PhilanthropyGLOVERSVILLE LIB…THE GLOVERSVILLE THEATRE CORP: $127,939 · Arts & CultureTHE GLOVERSVIL…JAMES A BRENNAN MEMORIAL HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $9,000 · Animals
Other$702,901Philanthropy$147,905Arts & Culture$127,939Animals$9,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGLOVERSVILLE LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $147,905 over 9y, 9.9% of budgetTHE FULTON COUNTY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $132,686 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetTHE GLOVERSVILLE THEATRE CORP: $127,939 over 9y, 26% of budgetJAMES A BRENNAN MEMORIAL HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $9,000 over 9y, 1.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GLOVERSVILLE LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FULTON COUNTY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GLOVERSVILLE THEATRE CORP ↗
  • Who funds JAMES A BRENNAN MEMORIAL HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Nicholas Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Nicholas Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Nicholas’ filings →

    More from the funding graph