Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Niblack Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$31k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Arts & Culture$203kScience & Tech$120kHuman Services$100kPhilanthropy$50kHealth$40kHousing & Shelter$38kEducation$35kReligion$34kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$37k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
United Way of Palm Beach$10,000
Colby Sawyer College$5,000
High Hopes Therapeutic Riding$5,000
First Congregational Church$5,000
Crosby Fund For Haitian Ed$3,500
Habitat For Humanity$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–21, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COVENANT HOUSE: $10k → 17%Covenant House: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$403k · 10 repeat orgs$241k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
10

Total granted

$403k
$241k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+1%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureInternationalHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEducationHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NORTON MUSEUM OF ART INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $186k · revenue +105%
  • CF
    CROSBY FUND FOR HAITIAN EDUC INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $22k · revenue +45%
  • CH
    COVENANT HOUSE
    6× · 2019–2025 · $20k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • SF
    SOUTH FLORIDA SCIENCE CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $120k
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY OF NEW LONDON CT
    one grant, 2019 · $75k
  • TS
    The Salvation Army
    5× · 2021–2025 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
The President and Trustees of Colby College

to provide a rigorous and transformative liberal arts education that prepares students to become thoughtful, engaged citizens.

Education
3
Rhode Island School of Design

The mission of rhode island school of design, through its college and museum,is to educate its students and the public in the creation and (see schedule o)appreciation of works of art and design, to discover and transmit knowledge and to…

Education
4
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
5
Connecticut Humane Society

The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare, enriching the lives of families and communities through adoption services, medical care, education, and prevention of cruelty.

Animals
6
Connecticut Association of Realtors Inc

Provide education and legal information, conferences and special activities; public relations, legislative efforts and lobbying for members.

7
Hillwood Estate Museum & Gardens

Hillwood estate, museum & garden's (hillwood) mission is to share the renowned art collections, exceptional gardens and related public and educational programs with a wide and diverse audience. since its opening, hillwood has served…

Arts & Culture
8
Habitat for Humanity North Central Connecticut

Hartford area habitat for humanity is dedicated to strengthening communities by empowering low-income families to change their lives and the lives of future generations through homeownership opportunities. this is accomplished by working…

Housing & Shelter
9
Avery Copp Museum

The Avery-Copp Museum celebrates, preserves, and documents the historic home, its collection, and the grounds belonging to the Avery and Copp families in Groton, Connecticut. Our purpose is to engage the public in learning about history of…

Arts & Culture
10
University of Hartford

Dedicated to learning, personal growth, knowledge creation, and the betterment of society. the university engages students in aquiring the knowledge, skills, and values necessary to thrive in and contribute to a pluralistic, complex world.

Education
11
The Parrish Art Museum Inc

The museum encourages an appreciation of modern and contemporary art through exhibitions, education, and public programs for diverse audiences.inspired by the natural setting and historical artistic community of long island's east end, the…

Arts & Culture
12
New Hampshire Historical Society

To educate a diverse public about the significance of New Hampshire's past and its relationship to our lives today. To this end, the Society collects, preserves, and interprets material pertaining to New Hampshire history.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is High Hopes Therapeutic Riding Inc and the most unlike its peers is Covenant House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SOUTH FLORIDA SCIENCE CENTER — $120,000 · OtherSOUTH FLORIDA SCIENCE CENTERSALVATION ARMY OF NEW LONDON CT — $75,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY OF NEW LONDON CTUnited Way of Palm Beach — $40,000 · OtherUnited Way of Palm BeachHIGH HOPES THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC — $40,000 · OtherHIGH HOPES THERAPEUTIC RIDING INCFirst Congregational Church — $34,400 · OtherFirst Congregational ChurchColby Sawyer College — $30,000 · OtherColby Sawyer CollegeThe Salvation Army — $25,000 · OtherThe Salvation ArmyHabitat For Humanity — $15,000 · Other+3 more — $2,388 · OtherNORTON MUSEUM OF ART INC — $186,000 · Arts & CultureNORTON MUSEUM OF ART INCFLORENCE GRISWOLD MUSEUM INC — $15,000 · Arts & CultureFLORENCE GRISWOLD MUSEUM INC+1 more — $1,000 · Arts & CultureCROSBY FUND FOR HAITIAN EDUC INC — $21,670 · InternationalCOVENANT HOUSE — $20,000 · Human ServicesTown of Palm Beach United Way Inc — $10,000 · PhilanthropyColby-Sawyer College — $5,000 · EducationHabitat for Humanity of Eastern Connecticut Inc — $2,500 · Housing & ShelterCONNECTICUT AUDUBON SOCIETY INC — $1,000 · Environment
Other$381,788Arts & Culture$202,000International$21,670Human Services$20,000Philanthropy$10,000Education$5,000Housing & Shelter$2,500Environment$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNORTON MUSEUM OF ART INC — $186,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetHIGH HOPES THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC — $40,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetCROSBY FUND FOR HAITIAN EDUC INC — $21,670 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE — $20,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFLORENCE GRISWOLD MUSEUM INC — $15,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetColby-Sawyer College — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of Eastern Connecticut Inc — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONNECTICUT AUDUBON SOCIETY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Society of the Four Arts Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTON MUSEUM OF ART INC
  • Who funds HIGH HOPES THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC
  • Who funds CROSBY FUND FOR HAITIAN EDUC INC
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE
  • Who funds FLORENCE GRISWOLD MUSEUM INC
  • Who funds Town of Palm Beach United Way Inc
  • Who funds Colby-Sawyer College
  • Who funds Habitat for Humanity of Eastern Connecticut Inc
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT AUDUBON SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds The Society of the Four Arts Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Eastern Connecticut IncCT13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Eastern Connecticut Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Niblack Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Florence Griswold Museum Inc2% of income from government
  • Connecticut Audubon Society Inc1% of income from government
  • High Hopes Therapeutic Riding Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Niblack Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Niblack Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph